• facebook
Author: Andrzej Paweł Śledź
E-mail 1: andrzej.sledz.16@ucl.ac.uk
Institution: Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland)
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 289–297
DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017220
PDF: ppsy/46-2/ppsy2017220.pdf

The paper is a methodological review essay of Michael Bernhard and Jan Kubik’s comparative study of politics of memory and commemoration in seventeen Central and Eastern European states twenty years after the fall of state socialism. The goal of the essay is to critically examine Bernhard and Kubik’s volume, with a particular focus on the comparative methods they applied to explain how some political and cultural factors at the time of the collapse of communism affected a memory regime in the post-communist democracies. This analysis critically examines four aspects of the study, being: the central theoretical assumptions and contribution in comparative and memory politics; case selection; methodology and data analysis; main findings. Each part includes a summary of the particular aspect of the book, the main strengths and weaknesses, and possible improvements. The review essay emphasis is particularly novel and innovative comparative methodology in studying politics of memory and its universality, suggesting, however, severe problems with a lack of clear and consistent discourse analysis methodology which could affect the quality of final results.

Review Essay: Michael Bernhard & Jan Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. New York: Oxford University Press 2014 (pp. 384). ISBN 9780199375134. Price: £79.00.

Disclaimer: The project was supported by the Jagiellonian University Faculty of Philosophy and Fundacja Studentów i Absolwentów UJ “Bratniak”.

References:

  • Ágh, A. (2016). "Cultural War and Reinventing the Past in Poland and Hungary: The Politics of Historical Memory in East–Central Europe". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 32–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016003
  • Bernhard, M., &  Kubik, J. (2014a). "Introduction". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 1-6). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bernhard, M., &  Kubik, J. (2014b). "A Theory of the Politics of Memory". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 7-34). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bernhard, M., &  Kubik, J. (2014c). "The Politics and Culture of Memory Regimes". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 261-295). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bernhard, M., &  Kubik, J. (2014d). "Roundtable Discord: the Contested Legacy of 1989 in Poland". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 60-84). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Brendese, P. J. (2014). The Power of Memory in Democratic Politics. New York: University of Rochester Press.
  • Choi, S., & David, R. (2012). "Lustration Systems and Trust: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland". The American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1172-1201.
  • Eglitis, D.S., & Ardava, L. (2014). "Remembering the Revolution: Contested Pasts in the Baltic Countries". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 123-145). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., & Baranowska, G. (2016). "The European Court of Human Rights on Nazi and Soviet Past in Central and Eastern Europe". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 117–129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016009
  • Kozyrska, A. (2016). "Decommunisation of the Public Space in Post–Euromaidan Ukraine". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 130–144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016010
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). "Remembrance, Identity Politics and Political Transitions: a Comparative Study". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 4, pp. 11–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016001
  • Pop-Eleches, G. (2014). "Romania Twenty Years after 1989: The Bizarre Echoes of a Contested Revolution". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 85-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rekść, M. (2016). "Post–Yugoslav Collective Memory: Between National and Transnational Myths". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 73–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016006
  • Sebina, O. (2016). "Securitization of Past:  Analysis of the Katyń Issue in the Context of EU Integration". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 45–59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016004
  • Seleny, A. (2014). "Revolutionary Road: 1956 and the Fracturing of Hungarian Historical Memory". In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism (pp. 37-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2017). "The Government’s Remembrance Policy: Five Theoretical Hypotheses". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(1), pp. 294–312. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017119
  • Wawrzyński, P., & Stańco-Wawrzyńska, A. (2016). "South African Post–Apartheid Transitional Remembrance Policy (1994–1999)". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 145–154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016011.

 

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.