• facebook
Author: Joanna Marszałek-Kawa
E-mail 1: kawadj@box43.pl
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland)
Author: Patryk Wawrzyński
E-mail: patryk.wawrzynski@gmail.com
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland) & WSB University in Bydgoszcz (Poland)
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 11-21
DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016001
PDF: ppsy/45/ppsy2016001.pdf

The paper presents findings of the comparative study on relationships between remembrance story-telling and the transitional reconstruction of political identities. It identifies in which areas and fields of impact governments tend to use interpretations of the past to promote new leadership visions of society. Moreover, it verifies theoretical hypotheses related to the politicised remembrance and its role as a political asset during transformations, as well as it considers the theoretical framework of democracy-building (and a common prediction of its universal character). As a result, the study offers a detailed picture of the way remembrance narratives are transformed into explanations, justifications or legitimisation of new, post-authoritarian identities based on qualitative-to-quantitative analysis of the intensity of story-telling and its links with transitional identity politics. In the conclusion, the Authors present their consideration of research findings, and they discuss it with reference to the nature of transitional government’s remembrance policy as a sphere of social influence. 

References:

  • Koczanowicz, L. (1997). “Memory of Politics and Politics of Memory. Reflections on the Construction of the Past in Post–Totalitarian Poland”. Studies in East European Thought, 49, pp. 259–270.
  • Labanyi, J. (2008). “The Politics of Memory in Contemporary Spain”. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 9 (2), pp 119–125.
  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Marszałek–Kawa, J., Ratke–Majewska, A., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). Polityka pamięci i kształtowanie tożsamości politycznej w czasie tranzycji poautorytarnej. Tom 2: Analiza porównawcza. Warszawa: Difin.
  • Mead, G. H. (1917). “Scientific Method and Individual Thinker”. In J. Dewey et al. (Eds.), Creative Intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 176–227). New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  • Pałecki, K. (2015). “Democracy without demos?”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 44, pp. 171–192.
  • Smith, R. (2003). Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Mortality of Political Membership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vejvodova, P. (2016). “Extremism and East Central European politics”. In J. Holzer & M. Mareš (Eds.), Challenges to democracies in East Central Europe (pp. 56–69). London–New York: Routledge.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2015). “Emocje i zaangażowanie a skuteczność narracji polityki historycznej. Wyniki badań eksperymentalnych”. Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość, 26, pp. 159–182.
  • Wawrzyński, P., Muszyński, M. A., Czarnek, G., & Schattkowsky, R. (2015). “Individual Differences and Attitudes towards the Government’s Remembrance Policy”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 44, pp. 125–139.
  • Wawrzyński, P., & Schattkowsky, R. (2015). “Attitudes towards the Government’s Remembrance Policy in Poland: Results of an Experimental Study”. Politics in Central Europe, 11 (2), pp. 73–94.
  • Westen, D. (2008). The Political Brain. The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs.

 

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.