• facebook
Author: Loretta C. Salajan
E-mail: l.c.salajan@gmail.com
Institution: Vasile Goldis Western University in Arad (Romania)
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 67–76
DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018105
PDF: ppsy/47-1/ppsy2018105.pdf

This paper analyses Romania’s foreign policy during the first post-communist years, by employing a theoretical viewpoint based on ontological security and trauma. It uncovers the elite efforts to secure the post-totalitarian state’s identity and international course. Romania’s search for ontological security featured the articulation of narratives of victimhood, which were linked with its proclaimed western European identity. The Romanian identity narrative has long struggled between “the West” and “the East”, trying to cope with traumatic historical events. These discursive themes and ontological insecurities were crystallized in the controversy surrounding the Romanian-Soviet “Friendship Treaty” (1991). Key Romanian officials displayed different typical responses to cultural trauma and debated the state’s path to ontological security, which was reflected in the foreign policy positions. 

 

References:

  • Abraham, F. (2006). Transformarea României: 1989-2006. Rolul factorilor externi, Bucharest: INST.
  • Alexander, J.C. (2004). “Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma”. In J.C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser and P. Sztompka (Eds.). Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity (pp. 1–59). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Anghel, F. (2014). “La margini și sfârșit de imperiu: Tratatul româno-sovietic din 5 aprilie 1991 și consecințele pentru Republica Moldova”. Polis, 4(3). Retrieved from http://revistapolis.ro/la-margini-si-sfarsit-de-imperiu-tratatul-romano-sovietic-din-5-aprilie-1991-si-consecintele-pentru-republica-moldova/
  • Auchter, J. (2014). The Politics of Haunting and Memory in International Relations. New York: Routledge.
  • Baicoianu, A. (2008). “Markers and Shifters of Romanian Identity”. Analele Universităţii “Ovidius” – Literary and Cultural Encounters, 19, pp. 9–12.
  • Baicoianu, A. (2006). “The Trap of Memory: Auto-Orientalism as Victimization”. TRANS. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften, 16. Retrieved from www.inst.at/trans/16Nr/02_2/baicoianu16.htm
  • Becker, D.J. (2014). “Memory and Trauma as Elements of Identity in Foreign Policymaking”. In E. Resende & D. Budryte (Eds.), Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, Cases and Debates (pp. 57–73 ). London, Routledge.
  • Bell, D. (Ed.) (2006). Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationship between Past and Present, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bell, D. (2003).” Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity”. British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 63–81.
  • Boia, L. (2001). History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness. Budapest: Central European University Press.
  • Cioculescu, Ș.F. (2009). România postcomunistă în „ecuația” strategică a vecinătăților: Balcanii, Marea Neagră şi Orientul Mijlociu Extins, Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
  • Edkins, J. (2003). Trauma and the Memory of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ejdus, F. (2017). “Critical Situations, Fundamental Questions and Ontological Insecurity in World Politics”. Journal of International Relations and Development, 1–26. doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0083-3 
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hitchins, K. (2014). A Concise History of Romania, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iliescu, I. (1990). Speech at the CSCE Summit. Adevărul, I-239, 3–5.
  • Iliescu, I. (1992). Cred în schimbarea în bine a României, Bucharest: Fundaţia “Dimineaţa”.
  • Iliescu, I. (1994). Romania in Europe and in the World. Bucharest: The Foreign Languages Press Group.
  • Iliescu, I. (1996). Momente de istorie. Documente, alocuţiuni, interviuri, comentarii: septembrie 1991–octombrie 1992. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică.
  • Innes, A.J., & Steele, B.J. (2014). “Memory, Trauma and Ontological Security”. In E. Resende & D. Budryte (Eds.), Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, Cases and Debates (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge.
  • Ivan, S. (1998). Radiografii parlamentare. De vorbă cu Alexandru Bârlădeanu, Constanţa: Ex Ponto.
  • Krotoszyński, M. (2017). “Transitional Justice Models and Analytic Philosophy: Towards Theory“. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(2), pp. 9–22. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017201.
  • Langenbacher, E., & Shain, Y. (2010). Power and the Past: Collective Memory and International Relations. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). “Remembrance, Identity Politics and Political Transitions: A Comparative Study”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 11–21. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016001.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Wawrzyński, P., & Ratke-Majewska, A. (2017). The Politics of Memory in Post-Authoritarian Transitions, Volume Two: Comparative Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Meleşcanu, T. (2002). Renaşterea diplomaţiei româneşti. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia.
  • Mitroiu, S. (2015) Life Writing and Politics of Memory in Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mitroiu, S. (2016). “Recuperative Memory in Romanian Post-communist Society”. Nationalities Papers. The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 44(5), pp. 751–771.
  • Mitzen, J. (2006). “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma”. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), pp. 341–370.
  • Năstase, A. (1996). Cartea Albă: România–NATO. Bucharest: Romcartexim.
  • Năstase, A. (2006). România după Malta. 875 de zile la Externe, vol. 1. Bucharest: Fundaţia Titulescu.
  • Oprisko, R., & Kaliher, K. (2014). “The State as Person? Anthropomorphic Personification vs. Concrete Durational Being”. Journal of International and Global Studies, 6(1), pp. 30-49.
  • Resende, E. & Budryte, D. (2014). Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, Cases and Debates. London, Routledge.
  • Roth, E.R. (2015). “Sinatra Doctrine, Kvitsinski Doctrine, Warsaw Pact and the Soviet “Finlandization” of Romania’s Foreign Policy in the Early 1990s”. Romanian Review of Political Science and International Relations, 12(2), pp. 112–129. Retrieved from http://journal.ispri.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/11-Rudolf-112-129.pdf.
  • Salajan, L.C. (2016). “National Identity and International Politics: An Analysis of Romania’s Post-Communist Foreign Policy Imaginary (1990-1996)”. Romanian Political Science Review, 16(3), pp. 357–375.
  • Saunders, E.N. (2011). Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Severin, A. (1995). Lacrimile dimineţii. Slăbiciunile guvernului Roman. Bucharest: SCRIPTA.
  • Soare, S. (2008). “Romania’s National Security Strategy – A Critical Approach of Transformational Politics”. Strategic Monitor, 1–2, pp. 53–66.
  • Soare, S. (2013). Still Talking Past Each Other: Romanian-Russian Relations. Russian Analytical Digest, 125, pp. 14–18. Retrieved from http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD-125-14-18.pdf
  • Socor, V. (1991). “The Romanian-Soviet Friendship Treaty and Its Regional Implications”. Report on Eastern Europe, 2(18), pp. 25–33.
  • Stan, L., & Turcescu, L. (2017). Justice, Memory and Redress in Romania: New Insights. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Stan, L., & Vancea, D. (2015). Post-communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present, and Future, London: Lexington Books.
  • Stan, L. (Ed.) (2009). Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.
  • Stan, L. (2013). Transitional Justice in Post-communist Romania: The Politics of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Steele, B.J. (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.
  • Subotic, J. (2016). “Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change”. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), pp. 610–627.
  • Tudoroiu, T. (2008). “From Spheres of Influence to Energy Wars: Russian Influence in Post-Communist Romania”. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24(3), pp. 386–414. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13523270802267922
  • Verdery, K. (1991). National Ideology under Socialism: Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceauşescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2017). “The Government’s Remembrance Policy: Five Theoretical Hypotheses”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(1), pp. 294–312. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017119.
  • Wittes, T.C. (2005). How Israelis and Palestinians Negotiate: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Oslo Peace Process. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
  • Zarakol, A. (2011). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zarakol, A. (2010). “Ontological (In)Security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan”. International Relations, 24(1), pp. 3–23.

 

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.