Author: Daniel Knaga
E-mail: daniel.knaga@op.pl
Institution: Uniwersytet Łódzki
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 11-33
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2017.01.01
PDF: ppk/35/ppk3501.pdf

Streszczenie:

Evident groundlessness constitutional complaint

Grounds of constitutional complaints admissibility have in majority formal character. According to article 77.3.3 The Constitutional Tribunal Act of 25 June 2015, the Tribunal shall issue a decision on refusal to proceed with an application of a constitutional complaint, if an application or a constitutional complaint are manifestly unfounded. Evident groundlessness is constitutes a substantial requirement od admissibility. Since it has a character of a general clause, its meaning is determined in the process of application of law. Any doubts whether the complaint is evidently groundless, should result with its consideration in regular proceedings, and full examination of its legitimacy. The possibility of the substantive examination of complaints grounds, at the preliminary stage has an exceptional character, and should be given restrictive interpretation. The practice based on the opposite assumption could change constitutional complaints role as a remedy for constitutional rights and freedoms infringement.

klauzula generalna ustawa o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym konstytucyjne prawa i wolności oczywista bezzasadność skarga konstytucyjna

Kontynuuj czytanie

Author: Paweł Króliczek
E-mail: pawelkroliczek@gmail.com.
Institution: Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Source: Show
Pages: 35-53
DOI Number: 10.15804/ppk.2017.01.02
PDF: ppk/40/ppk4011.pdf

Streszczenie:

The article focuses on the analysis of objective scope of right to put forward a constitutional complaint. Of particular imprtance, for this issue, is the function of constitutional complaint. It is an instrument of human rights protection. Due to the brevity of statutory and constitutional regulation of this problem, Constitutional Tribunal had to determine this aspect of its activity. It is glaringly obvious that individuals are the biggest group of complainants because constitutional rights inhere mainly to a natural person. It is crucial that constitutional complaint is a guarantee of exactly that entitlements. Disputes have arisen with the granting a proactive complainants legitimation for collective bodies, especially public ones.

skarga konstytucyjna zakres podmiotowy skargi konstytucyjnej jednostka, ochrona praw i wolności konstytucyjnych

Kontynuuj czytanie

Author: Jakub G. Firlus
E-mail: jakub.firlus@uj.edu.pl
Institution: Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Author: Natalie Fox
E-mail: natalie.fox@uj.edu.pl
Institution: Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 55-69
DOI Number: 10.15804/ppk.2017.01.03
PDF: ppk/35/ppk3503.pdf

Streszczenie:

On June 23rd, 2016, the United Kingdom (UK) held an EU-Referendum which resulted in a vote in favor of withdrawing from the European Union (EU). However, in a post-referendum reality, several constitutional issues have become apparent. On one hand, it is not certain whether the Prime Minister, under the royal prerogatives, can trigger Art. 50 of the EU Treaty. On the other hand, the scope of Westminster’s approval must still be determined. It is believed that the judiciary will end up in a constitutional crisis, especially the Supreme Court. At the very least, the suspension of ‘Brexit’ procedures is causing uncertainty on both sides i.e. UK and EU. This paper will pose some of the essential questions being discussed on the eve of the Supreme Court’s decision over ‘Brexit’ in December of 2016/January of 2017.

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, competences Parliament sovereignty royal prerogatives, Article 50 of the EU Treaty Brexit

Kontynuuj czytanie

Author: Jerzy Kuciński
E-mail: barbara.kucinoka@vp.pl
Institution: Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Warszawie
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 72-108
DOI Number: 10.15804/ppk.2017.01.04
PDF: ppk/35/ppk3504.pdf

Streszczenie:

Memers of Parliament are together with Sejm in pleno, and parliamentary commissions, one of the entities entitled to control widly understood states government, which consists of: the Counsil of Ministers in gremio, Primeminister, other members of the Counsil of Ministers, as well as central and local organs of governmental administration. The purpose of this work is an analysis of members of Parliament position as parliamentary control entities, according to normative regulations, in particular provisions of Constitution. The above mentioned position consists of following elements: 1) general status of deputy determined by two groups of features: a) in general by position of Sejm in the system of govering bodies in the Republic of Poland, and concept of relation of deputies to electors, b) on the detailed ground by normative acts regulations – The Constitution of The Republic of Poland of 2nd April 1997, Act on performance of deputy, and senators mandate, Sejms regulation; 2) subjective, and objective scope of deputies rights to control governments activity, which is identical with subjective, and objective scope of such control determined in art. 95 of 1997 Constitution; 3) institutions remaining in deputies disposal which aim is control, which are: a) deputies interpellations, b) deputies questions, deputies questions in ongoing matters, d) information in ongoing matters.

posłowie status prawny posła, kontrola sejmowa interpelacje poselskie zapytania poselskie pytania w sprawach bieżących informacje bieżące

Kontynuuj czytanie

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.