Author: James Underwood
E-mail: james.underwood@northampton.ac.uk
Institution: University of Northampton
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-2408
Author: Marta Kowalczuk-Walędziak
E-mail: m.kowalczuk@uwb.edu.pl
Institution: University of Białystok
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-2947
Author: Joanne Barrow
E-mail: joanne.barrow@northampton.ac.uk
Institution: University of Northampton
Year of publication: 2020
Source: Show
Pages: 156-173
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2020.02.09
PDF: kie/128/kie12809.pdf

In this article we explore and discuss the benefits of and the challenges that arise when using qualitative methods to conduct research internationally. We firstly discuss the relationship that writers of qualitative studies have with their readers and the implications of this for writing style. This is then followed by an overview of different aspects of data collection design. Within this section we discuss research that we have conducted, as part of a variety of international projects, using two qualitative approaches: systematic documentary research and interview. We then focus on using interview as a research method. This discussion regarding using interviews is divided into two chapters. Firstly, we discuss issues of access and sampling, then the interview itself and the analysis of interview data. The final sections involve a discussion of ways in which validity and reliability can be contextualised within qualitative studies, and also a discussion on generalisability and the possibility of theory generation. We conclude with sections on ethics and possible future directions for international qualitative studies into teacher education.

REFERENCES:

  • Adamson, B. (2012). International Comparative Studies in Teaching and Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), pp. 641–648. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.003.
  • Afdal, H.W. (2019). The Promises and Limitations of International Comparative Research on Teacher Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), pp. 258–275. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2019.1566316.
  • Arnove, R. (2013). Introduction: Reframing Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Glo­bal and the Local. In: R. Arnove, C.A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local (4th ) (pp. 1–27). London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London, UK: Sage.
  • Bolat, O. (2013). A Non-Positional Teacher Leadership Approach to School Improvement: An Action Research Study in Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cam­bridge.
  • Bray, M. (2014). Actors and Purposes in Comparative Education. In: B. Adamson, M. Bray, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods (2nd ) (pp. 19–46). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • The British Education Research Association (BERA) (2018). Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. UK: BERA. Retrieved from: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/sshp/research/sshp-ethics-committee-and-procedures/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Cogni, M. (2018). From Sentences to Essays: A Guide to Reflective Writing through Reflective Thinking. USA. Vernon.
  • Creaby, C. (2013, September). Teacher Identity and Implications for Educational Improvement. Paper presented at the European Conference on Education Research (ECER) 2013. Istan­bul, Turkey.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fakile, D., Underwood, J., & Sehr, R. (2019, June). Is My University White? ‘Tackling Inequali­ties’ Conference, Keele University. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28334.66888.
  • Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Hantrais, L. (2008). International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. UK. Palgrave.
  • Joshevska, M., & Kirandziska, S. (2017). The Rise and Rise of Teacher Leadership in Mac­edonia. In: D. Frost (Ed.), Empowering Teachers as Agents of Change: A Non-Positional Approach to Teacher Leadership (pp. 79–84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kędzierska, H., & Mizerek, H. (Eds.) (2013). Jakościowe inspiracje w badaniach edukacyjnych refleksje na marginesie projektów badawczych. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo UWM.
  • Kosmützky, A. (2015). In Defence of International Comparative Studies. On the Analytical and Explanatory Power of the Nation State in International Comparative Higher Educa­tion Research. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), pp. 354–370. DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2015.1015107.
  • Kowalczuk-Walędziak, M., Lopes, A., Menezes, I., & Tormenta, N. (2017). Teachers Pursuing a Doctoral Degree: Motivations and Perceived Impact. Educational Research, 59(3), pp. 335–352. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287.
  • Livingston, K., & Flores, M.A. (2017). Trends in Teacher Education: A Review of Papers Pub­lished in the European Journal of Teacher Education over 40 Years. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), pp. 551–560. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1387970.
  • Lukenchuk, A. (Ed.) (2013). Paradigms of Research for the 21st Century: Perspectives and Examples from Practice. Oxford: Peter Lang.
  • Newby, P. (2014). Research Methods for Education (2nd ). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Nowakowska-Siuta, R. (2014). Pedagogika porównawcza. Problemy, stan badań i perspektywy rozwoju. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
  • Palka, S. (Ed.) (2010). Podstawy metodologii badań w pedagogice. Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Punch, K., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to Research Methods in Education (2nd ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research (4th ). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research (4th ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting Qualitative Data (5th ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Smith, M.J. (1998). Social Science in Question. London, UK: Sage.
  • Squires, A. (2009). Methodological Challenges in Cross-Language Qualitative Research: A Research Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), pp. 277–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.006.
  • Suter, L., Smith, E., & Denman, B. (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Studies in Education. London, UK: Sage.
  • Tilley, S. (2019). The Role of Critical Qualitative Research in Educational Contexts: A Canadian Perspective. Educar em Revista, 35(75), pp. 155–180. DOI: 10.1590/0104-4060.66806.
  • Teleshaliyev, N. (2014, September). Teachers with a Capital ‘T’ in Kyrgyzstan: Moral Purpose, Self-efficacy and Resilience. Paper Presented at the European Conference on Education Research (ECER) 2014. Porto, Portugal.
  • Underwood, J. (2017, September). Exchanging Knowledge and Building Communities via Inter­national Networking. The Asian Conference on Education and International Develop­ment, Kobe Arts Centre, Kobe, Japan.
  • Underwood, J., & Joshevska, M. (2019). A Proposed Typology of Knowledge Sharing within Communities of Teachers: A Comparative Case Study Focusing on England and Macedo­nia. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), pp. 113–128. DOI: 10.22492/ije.7.1.07.
  • Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ). London, UK: Sage.
  • Yurkofsky, M., Blum-Smith, S., & Brennan, K. (2019). Expanding Outcomes: Exploring Var­ied Conceptions of Teacher Learning in an Online Professional Development Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart