Author: Monika Giżyńska
Institution: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Year of publication: 2010
Source: Show
Pages: 231-240
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2010.01.18
PDF: ppk/01/ppk118.pdf

Streszczenie:

The article concerns competence of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court in socalled „other matters”. They include presenting the opinion (of conclusion) in four cases: 1) whether during choices of the president or members of the Seimas the infringed election act didn’t stay, 2) whether the state of health of the president permits him still to perform its duties, 3) whether international agreements of the Lithuanian Republic aren’t contrary to the constitution, 4) whether members of the Seimas and officials, towards which undertaken litigation proceedings stayed, infringed the constitution with one’s specific acts. One should however emphasize that an inspection of norms, as connections is a base of the scope of the cognition of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court oneself with the protection of the precedence of the constitution.

Litwa kognicja sądu konstytucyjnego sąd konstytucyjny,

Kontynuuj czytanie

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart