Author: Jakub Gortat
Institution: University of Łódź (Poland)
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 71-84
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/46-2/ppsy2017205.pdf

Germany is an example of a country which has been implementing transitional justice for decades and is still active in this field. What is more, contemporary Germans have recently come to terms with their not-so-distant past and their negligence in this area by showing the falsehood, backwardness, and injustice as negative foundations of the young Federal Republic. This article evokes the person of Fritz Bauer, the prosecutor in the state of Hessen. His struggle for human dignity and the memory of his achievements after his death exemplify an accomplished case of transitional justice and the memory of it. During his lifetime he contributed to bringing to trial numerous Nazi criminals, even at the cost of habitual threats and disregard. Forgotten for a few decades, Bauer and his legacy have been recently rediscovered and studied. Eventually, Bauer became a movie character and was finally brought back to the collective memory of Germans. The belated, but a well-deserved wave of popularity of Fritz Bauer in the German culture memory proves that reflections on the transitional justice are still topical and important.


  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.
  • Bauer, F. (1945). Die Kriegsverbrecher vor Gericht. Zürich: Europa.
  • Bauer, F. (1965). "Die Verjährung nazistischer Mordtaten". Vorgänge: Eine kulturpolitische Korrespondenz, 2, p. 49.
  • Bilsky, L. (2001). "Between Justice and Politics. The Competition of Storytellers in the Eichmann Trial". In S.E. Aschheim (Ed.), Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Cohen, D. (2006). "Transitional Justice in Divided Germany after 1945". In J. Elster (Ed.), Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (pp. 59-88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ebbrecht, T. (2008). "History, Public Memory and Media Event: Codes and Conventions of Historical Event-Television in Germany". In S. Nicholas, T. O’Malley & K. Williams (Eds.), Reconstructing the Past. History in the Mass Media 1890-2005 (pp. 101-114). Routledge: New York.
  • Eisikovits, N. (2017). "Transitional Justice". Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from:
  • Frei, N. (2002). Adenauer's Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Frei, N. (2014). "Fritz Bauer oder: Wann wird ein Held zum Helden?". In S. Gerber, T. Greiling, T. Kaiser, T. & K. Ries (Eds.), Zwischen Stadt, Staat und Nation. Bürgertum in Deutschland (pp. 273-276). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Fritz-Bauer-Institut. Retrieved from:
  • Fröhlich, C. (2006). Wider die Tabuisierung des Ungehorsams: Fritz Bauers Widerstandsbegriff und die Aufarbeitung von NS-Verbrechen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
  • Gesetze im Internet (1998, November 13). "German Criminal Code". Gesetze im Internet. Retrieved from:
  • Gordon, R. H. (2015). "The Eradication of Nazi Ideology and Terminology from the Current German Penal Code". Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, 17, pp. 182-196.
  • Kahn, R. A. (2004). Holocaust Denial and the Law. A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kansteiner, W. (2006). In Pursuit of German Memory. History, Television and Politics after Auschwitz. Athens: Ohio University Press.
  • Kellerhoff, S. F. (2016). "Warum plötzlich so viele greise KZ-Täter angeklagt werden". Die Welt, August 10, 2016. Retrieved from
  • (2015, October 1). "Der Staat gegen Fritz Bauer. Kritik". Retrieved from
  • Kulish, N. (2008). "Germany Confronts Holocaust Legacy Anew". New York Times, January 29, 2008.
  • Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2002). "Memory Unbound The Holocaust and the Formation of Cosmopolitan Memory". European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), pp. 87–106.
  • Moeller, R. (2001). War Stories. The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Nagorski, A. (2016). The Nazi Hunters. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
  • Osiel, M. J. (1997). Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick: Transaction.
  • Pendas, D. O. (2006), The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Porombka, W. (2016). "Es können doch nicht alle Nazis gewesen sein". Die Zeit, February 24, 2016.
  • Romeike, S. (2016). "Transitional Justice in Germany after 1945 and after 1990". International Nuremberg Principles Academy. Retrieved from:
  • Schmid, H. (2009). "Deutungsmacht und kalendarisches Gedächtnis – die politischen Gedenktage". In P. Reichel,  H. Schmid, & P. Steinbach (Eds.), Der Nationalsozialismus. Die zweite Geschichte (pp. 175-216). München: Beck.
  • Schneider C. (2017). Diener des Rechts und der Vernichtung: Das Verfahren gegen die Teilnehmer der Konferenz von 1941 oder: Die Justiz gegen Fritz Bauer. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus Verlag.
  • Steinke, R. (2013). Fritz Bauer: oder Auschwitz vor Gericht, München: Piper.
  • Steitz, K. (2017). "Juristische und Epische Verfremdung. Fritz Bauers Kritik am Frankfurter Auschwitz Prozess (1963-1965) und Peter Weiss‘ dramatische Prozessbearbeitung Die Ermittlung. Oratorium in 11 Gesängen (1965)". German Studies Review, 1(40), pp. 79-101.
  • Walser M. (1965, March 13). "Unser Auschwitz". Frankfurter Abendpost.
  • Wittmann, R (2005). Beyond Justice. The Auschwitz Trial. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Wojak, I. (2009). Fritz Bauer 1903-1968: Eine Biographie. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart