Author: Joanna Kulska
Institution: University of Opole (Poland)
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 23-35
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/46-2/ppsy2017202.pdf

Recognition that societies will not be able to build a future as long as they do not face the ‘demons of the past’ has become a kind of universal truth over the last decades of the 20th Century (Gibney et al., 2008, p. 1). This view, though challenging and ambiguous, is reflected in the globally present attempts to improve or rebuild relations within and between different communities at the domestic and international level. The question concerning, on the one hand, the essence and most essential elements and, on the other hand, the instruments and the limitations of rebuilding relations, as well as the political implications of those processes have become the broad area of interest and the discourse leading to significantly different ideas and solutions. The article aims at presenting different approaches referring to dealing with the conflicted and traumatized past both at the domestic and international level. Some selected instruments and methods which enable movement from a divided past towards a common future are discussed namely the strategy of engagement with the past versus the strategy of avoidance of the past. The special attention is paid to the notion of reconciliation understood as a process of rebuilding of relations through the multi-dimensional transformation of former adversaries after the period of violence and repression.


  • Amstutz, M.R. (2013). International Ethics. Concepts, Theories and Cases in Global Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Ash, T.G. (1997). "True Confessions". The New York Review of Books, July 17, pp. 36-37.
  • Barkan, E., Karn, A. (2006). Taking Wrongs Seriously. Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Bar-Tal, D., Bennink, G.H. (2004). "The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process". In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation (pp. 11-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bolton, N., Zahirović, E.C. (2017). "Bosnia-Herzegovina: Choosing Peace Together (CPT)". In T. Bamat, N. Bolton, M. Leguro, A. Omer. Interreligious Action for Peace. Studies in Muslim-Christian Cooperation (pp. 21-32). Baltimore: Catholic Relief Services.
  • Chaudary, A. (2010). "Interview with Desmond Tutu, Archbishops of Cape Town". The Muslim World, 100(1), pp. 117-123.
  • Clark, J.N. (2010). "Reflections on trust and reconciliation: a case study of a central Bosnian village". The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(2), pp. 239-256.
  • Clark, J.N. (2012). The ICTY and the Challenges of Reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia. Retrieved from:
  • Cobban, H. (2007). Amnesty After Atrocity? Healing Nations after Genocide and War Crimes. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Crocker, D.A. (2000). "Retribution and Reconciliation". Report from the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, 20 (1), pp. 1-6.
  • De Greiff, P. (2010). "A Normative Conception of Transitional Justice". Politorbis, 50(3), pp. 17-29.
  • Domosławski, A. (2017). "Terapia prawdy". Polityka, 30(3120), pp. 46-48.
  • Dudek, A. (2016), Historia polityczna Polski 1989-2015. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak Horyzont.
  • Duthie, R. (2017). Justice Mosaics. How Context Shapes Transitional Justice in Fractured Societies. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.
  • Galtung, J. (2001) "After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution: Coping with Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence". In M. Abu-Nimer (ed.). Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence. Theory and Practice (pp. 3-24). Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Gibney, M., Howard-Hassmann R.E., Coicaud J-M., & Steiner N. (2008). The Age of Apology. Facing Up to the Past. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
  • Gonzáles, E., & Varney H. (2013). Truth Seeking. Elements of Creating Effective Truth Commission, Brasilia: Amnesty Commission of the Ministry of Justice of Brazil. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.
  • He, Y. (2015). The Search for Reconciliation. Sino-Japanese and German-Polish Relations since World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hermann, T. (2004). "Reconciliation: Reflections on the Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Term". In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation (pp. 39-60). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelman, H.C. (2004). Reconciliation as Identity Change. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 111-124.
  • Lederach, J-P. (1999). Building Peace. Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
  • Lind, J.M.(2010). Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). "Remembrance, Identity Politics and Political Transitions: a Comparative Study". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 11–21. DOI:
  • Montville, J. (2015). "A New Dimension for Statecraft", Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(2).
  • Montville, J. (2001). "Justice and the Burdens of History". In M. Abu-Nimer (ed.) Reconciliation, Justice and Coexistence, Theory and Practice (pp. 129-143). Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Montville, J. (2006). "Track Two Diplomacy: The Work of Healing History". The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations. Summer/Fall Issue.
  • Phillips, A.L. (2000). Power and Influence After Cold War. Germany in East-Central Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Philpott, D. (2012). Just and Unjust Peace. An Ethic of Political Reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Radzik, L., Murphy, C. (2015). Reconciliation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from:
  • Rieff, D. (2011). Against remembrance. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
  • Rieff, D. (2016). In Praise of Forgetting. Historical Memory and Its Ironies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Rousoux, V. (2004). "Human rights and the “work of memory” in international relations". Journal of Human Rights, 3(2), pp. 159-170.
  • Teodorov, T. (2003). Hope and Memory. Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tutu, D.M. (1999). No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.
  • Rieff D. Against Remembrance. Victoria: Melbourne University Press 2011.                
  • Sisson, J. (2010). "A Conceptual Framework for Dealing with the Past". Politorbis, 50(3), pp. 11-15.
  • UN Secretary General (2004). Report of the UN Secretary General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies (S/2004/616), pp. 1-24.
  • Villa-Vincencio, Ch. (2009). Walk with Us and Listen. Political Reconciliation in Africa. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2017). "The Government’s Remembrance Policy: Five Theoretical Hypotheses". Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46 (1), pp. 294-312. DOI:
  • Zehr, H. (2008). "Doing Justice, Healing Trauma – The Role of Restorative Justice in Peacebuilding". Peace Prints: Southasian Journal of Peacebuilding, 1(1), pp. 1-16.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart