Author: Patryk Wawrzyński
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland)
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 294-312
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/46-1/ppsy2017119.pdf

Remembrance is a powerful instrument of social mobilisation, identity construction and political competition. Its impact on individual and shared beliefs or attitudes makes it an object of government’s interest, because remembrance can be used to legitimise ideologies or policies. Theoretical considerations of a government’s role as a narrator lead us to the general definition of the government’s remembrance policy, which we understand as a complex of narratives and interpretations presented to influence citizens’ attitudes, behaviours, beliefs and identities. The paper develops the definition with five theoretical hypotheses on the effectiveness of remembrance narratives. It argues that the government’s remembrance policy is myth-motoric, non-scientific, emotional, based on commitment and that it is a type of social influence. The study is an initial verification of theoretical approach, and I believe that my arguments will motivate other researchers to investigate different aspects of a government’s desire to narrate past events. 


  • Abrams, P. (1983). Historical Sociology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Assmann, J. (1995). “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity”. New German Critique, 68, pp. 125-133.
  • Assmann, J. (2003). “Pamięć zbiorowa i tożsamość kulturowa”. Borussia. Kultura - Historia - Literatura 29-30, pp. 11-16.
  • Assmann, J. (2006). Thomas Mann und Ägypten: Mythos und Monotheismus in den Josephsromanen. Munich: Beck 2006.
  • Assmann, J. (2008). Pamięć kulturowa. Pismo, zapamiętywanie i polityczna tożsamość w cywilizacjach starożytnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). “Bad is stronger than good”. Review of General Psychology, 5, pp. 323-370.
  • Boyatzis, R.E., & Akrivou, K. (2006). “The ideal self as the driver of intentional change”. Journal of Management Development, 25(7), pp. 624-642.
  • Boyatzis, R. E., Bilimoria, D., Godwin, L., Hopkins, M.M., & Lingham, T. (2012). “Effective leadership in extreme crisis”. In Y. Neria, R. Gross, R.D. Marshall & E.S. Susser. (Eds.) 9/11: Mental Health in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks (pp. 197-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boyatzis, R.E., Smith, M.L., & Beveridge, A.J. (2013). “Coaching with Compassion: Inspiring Health, Well-Being, and Development in Organizations”. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), pp. 153-178.
  • Burke, P.J., & Reitzes, D.C. (1991). “An Identity Theory Approach to Commitment”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), pp. 239-251.
  • Burke, P.J., & Stets, J.E. (2009). Identity Theory. Oxford-New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.
  • Cappalletto, F. (2003). “Long-Term Memory of Extreme Events: From Autobiography to History”. The Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(2), pp. 241-260.
  • Cialdini, R. (2003). Influence. Science and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Clore, G.C. (2012). “Dlaczego przeżywamy emocje”. In P. Ekman & R.J. Davidson (Eds.) Natura emocji. Podstawowe zagadnienia (pp 94-102). Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Crawford, M. (2006). “Commemoration: Where Remembering and Forgetting Meets”. In J.A. Parker, M. Crawford & P. Harrison (Eds.) Time and Memory (pp. 225-228). Leiden-Boston: Brill.
  • Curran, V.G. (2003). “The Politics of Memory / Errinerungspolitik and the use propriety of law in the process of memory construction”. Law and Critique, 14, pp. 309-323.
  • Dianina, K. (2008). “Museum and Society in Imperial Russia: An Introduction”. Slavic Review 67(4), pp. 907-911.
  • Du Pisani, A. (2007). “Memory politics in Where Others Wavered The Autobiography of Sam Nujoma My Life in SWAPO and my participation in the liberation struggle of Namibia”. Journal of Namibian Studies, 1, pp. 97-107.
  • Engel, S. (1999). Context in Everything: The Nature of Memory. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Fogu, C., & Kansteiner, W. (2006). “The Politics of Memory and the Poetics of History”. In R.N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner & C. Fogu (Eds.) The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe (pp. 284-310). Durham-London: Duke Univeristy Press.
  • Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). “The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions”. American Psychologist, 56(3), pp. 218-226.
  • Fredrickson, B.L., & Losada, M.F. (2005). “Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing”. American Psychologist, 60(7), pp. 678-686.
  • Hutton, P.H. (1994). “Review Essey: History and Memory by Jacques Le Goff; Assassins of Memory: Esseys of the Denial of the Holocaust by Pierre Vidal-Naquet”. History and Theory, 33(1), pp. 95-107.
  • Jacob, M.C. (1995). “Review: History and Memory by Jacques Le Goff”. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 26(1), pp. 80-82.
  • Joule, R.-V., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2006). Gra w manipulacje. Wywieranie wpływu na ludzi, dla uczciwych. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Jõesalu, K. (2010). “The meaning of „late-socialism”: analyzing Estonians’ post-communist memory culture”. Asia Europe Journal, 8, pp. 293-303.
  • Khalili, L. (2007). Heroes and Martyrs of Palestine. The Politics of National Commemoration. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kiesler, C.A. (1977). “Sequential events in commitment”. Journal of Personality, 45(1), pp. 65-78.
  • Kiesler, C.A., & Munson, P.A. (1975). “Attitudes and Opinions”. Annual Review of Psychology, 26, pp. 415-456.
  • Klein, K.L. (2000). “On Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse”. Representations, 69, pp.127-150.
  • Kłoskowska, A. (2007). Socjologia kultury. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Koczanowicz, L. (1997). “Memory of Politics and Politics of Memory. Reflections on the Construction of the Past in Post-Totalitarian Poland”. Studies in East European Thought, 49, pp. 259-270.
  • Kołakowski, L. (1994). Obecność mitu. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskie.
  • Kundera, M. (2000).The Art of Novel. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Labanyi, J. (2008). “The Politics of Memory in Contemporary Spain”. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 9(2), pp. 119-125.
  • Landau, M.J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2009). “Evidence That Self-Relevant Motives and Metaphoric Framing Interact to Influence Political and Social Attitudes”. Psychological Science, 20, pp. 1421-1427.
  • Latane, B., & Darley J.M. (1968). The unresponsible bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Le Goff, J. (2007). Historia i pamięć. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Lehrer, J. (2007). Proust was a neuroscientist. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  • Lewis, B. (1975). History - Remembered, Revered, Invented. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). “Remembrance, Identity Politics and Political Transitions: A Comparative Study”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 11-21. DOI:
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Wawrzyński, P., & Ratke-Majewska, A. (2017). The Politics of Memory in Post-Authoritarian Transitions, Volume Two: Comparative Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Maruszewski, T. (2001). Psychologia poznania. Sposoby rozumienia siebie i świata. Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obdience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Misztal, B.A. (2004). “The Sacralization of Memory”. European Journal of Social Thought, 7(1), pp. 67-84.
  • Misztal, B.A. (2010). “Collective Memory in a Global Age. Leaning How and What to Remember”. Current Sociology, 58(1), pp. 24-44.
  • Munson, P.M., & Kiesler, C.A. (1974). “The role of attributions by others in the acceptance of persuasive communications”. Journal of Personality, 42(3), pp. 453-466.
  • Perkins, J. (1997) .The Suffering Self: Pain and Narrative Representation in the Early Christian Era. London: Routledge.
  • Reisberg, D., & Hauer, F. (2004). “Memory for Emotional Events”. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (eds.) Memory and Emotion (pp. 3-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rieff, D. (2016). In Praise of Forgetting. Historical Memory and Its Ironies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Ross, A.S. (1971). “Effects of increased responsibility on bystander intervention: The presence of children”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, pp. 306-310.
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G.C. (1988). “How do I feel about it? The informative function of mood”. In K. Fiedler and J.P. Forgansa (ed.) Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44-62). Toronto: C.J. Hogrefe.
  • Singer, J.A., & Conway, M.A. (2008). “Should we forget forgetting?”. Memory Studies, 1(3), pp. 279-285.
  • Smith, R. (2003). Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Mortality of Political Membership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Snyder, C.R. (2000). “Genesis: Birth and growth of hope”. In C.R. Snyder (ed.) Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications (pp. 25-57). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Szacka, B. (2003). “Historia i pamięć zbiorowa”. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 47(4). pp. 3-15.
  • Sztompka, P. (2000). “Cultural Trauma: The Other Face of Social Change”. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(4). pp. 449-466.
  • Tokarz, T. (2005). “Problem subiektywizmu w konstruowaniu narracji historycznej”. Kultura i Historia, 8, pp. 4-11.
  • Traba, R. (2008). “Wstęp do wydania polskiego. Pamięć kulturowa - pamięć komunikatywna. Teoria i praktyka badawcza Jana Assmanna”. In J. Assmann, Pamięć kulturowa. Pismo, zapamiętywanie i polityczna tożsamość w cywilizacjach starożytnych (pp. 11-29). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Trzebiński, J. (2002). “Narracyjne konstruowanie rzeczywistości”. In J. Trzebiński (Ed.) Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata (pp. 17-42). Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Turner, J.H. (2007). Human Emotions. A sociological theory. London-New York: Routledge.
  • Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. London: Rider.
  • Uldricks, T.J. (2009). “War, Politics and Memory. Russian Historians Reevaluate the Origins of World War II. History & Memory, 21(2), pp. 60-82.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2015). “Emocje i zaangażowania a skuteczność narracji polityki historycznej. Wyniki badań eksperymentalnych”. Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość, 26, pp. 159-181.
  • Wawrzyński, P., & Schattkowsky, R. (2015). “Attitudes towards the Government’s Remembrance Policy in Poland: Results of an Experimental Study”. Politics in Central Europe, 11(2), pp. 73-94.
  • Wawrzyński, P., Muszyński, M.A. Czarnek, & Schattkowsky, R. (2015a). “Individual differences and attitudes towards the government's remembrance policy”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 44, pp. 125-139.
  • Wawrzyński, P., Schattkowsky, R., Muszyński M.A., & Czarnek, G. (2015b). “Postawy wobec polskiej polityki historycznej: wyniki eksperymentu”. Polityka i Społeczeństwo, 4, pp. 134-145.
  • Wawrzyński, P., Schattkowsky, R., Muszyński M.A., & Czarnek, G. (2015c). “Role of emotions and commitment in an influence of remembrance narratives”. Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies, 48, pp. 107-116.
  • Wawrzyński, P., & Stańco-Wawrzyńska, A. (2016). “South African Post-Apartheid Transitional Remembrance Policy (1994-1999)”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 145-154. DOI:
  • Webber, S.J., & Mullen, P.B. (2011). Breakthrough into Comparison: „Moving” Stories, Local History, and the Narrative Turn”. Journal of Folklore Research, 48(3), pp. 213-247.
  • Westen, D. (2008). The Political Brain. The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Wolff-Powęska, A. (2007). “Polskie spory o historię i pamięć. Polityka historyczna”. Przegląd Zachodni, 1, pp. 3-44.
  • Zybertowicz, A. (2001). “Konstruktywizm jako orientacja metodologiczna w badaniach społecznych”. Kultura i Historia, 1, pp. 118-134.


Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart