Author: Olga Sebina
Institution: Jilin University (China)
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 45-59
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/45/ppsy2016004.pdf

This paper provides a theoretical explanation of what causes historical issues to impact bilateral relations between two states. The case which was chosen for analysis – popularly known as the Katyń issue – involves changes in Polish foreign policy towards the Russian Federation due to the remembrance of the Katyń Massacre. The main assumptions are based on the concept of securitization and its analytical framework, particularly the societal portion, which is proposed by the Copenhagen School of security study. The process of European integration can be seen as the main causal factor leading to a complex of vertical and horizontal competition between Poland, the EU, and Russia over the construction of their historical identities with a referent object of securitization in Poland. The main conclusion of this paper suggests that significant differences in the understanding of various nations’ roles in WW2 between the EU and Russia have led to the securitization of the Polish historical image of WW2. The Polish audience considered it important to accept the historical truth. The Katyń issue in Polish–Russian relations has become a case that reflects the process which leads to securitization of disputes between historical victims and victimizers on a state–to–state level. 


  • Alexander, J. C. (2012).Trauma: A Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bajomi–Lázár, P. (2014). Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest–NY.: Central European University Press.
  • Bebenek, C. (2007). The Heimat Maneuver. Transition ,97, p. 150–171.
  • Bieleń, S. (2012). The Possibility of Reconciliation in Polish–Russian Relations. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 27, p.11–61.
  • Bieleń, S. (2014). The Difficulties in the Normalization of Polish–Russian Relations. Studia Politologica Ucraino–Polona, 4, p. 61–70.
  • Bobiński, K. (2007, November 30). Polish Foreign Policy 2005–2007. Institute of Public Affairs. Policy Association for an Open Society. Retrieved from:–content/archive/Polish+Foreign+Policy.pdf
  • Buzan, B., Waver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998).Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Buzan, B., & Waver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • CBOS, (2010, May). The Katyń Massacre and its impact on Polish–Russian Relation. Polish Public Opinion, p. 1.
  • Chappell, L. (2010). Poland in Transition: implications for a European Security and Defense Policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 31 (2), p.225–248. DOI:
  • Eberhardt, A. (2006). Poland’s Relations with Russia. Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy, 1, p.115–131.
  • Fotyga, A. (2008). Government Information on Polish Foreign Policy in 2007. Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy, 1, p. 11–37.
  • Fredheim, R. (2014). The Memory of Katyn in Polish Political Discourse: A Quantitative Study. Europe–Asia Studies, 66 (7), p.1165–1187. DOI:
  • Gniazdowski, M. (2006). Historical Issues in Polish Foreign Policy in 2005. Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy, 1, p. 234-–259.
  • Gong, G.W. (2000). Remembering and Forgetting in East Asia: Strategic Dimensions in History. Asia–Pacific Review, 7 (2), p. 41– 50. DOI:
  • Gong, G.W. (2001). The Beginning of History: Remembering and Forgetting as Strategic Issue. The Washington Quarterly, 24 (2), p.45–57. DOI:
  • Gosudarstvennaja Duma Federal’nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii (2010). Postanovlenie o Zajavlenii “O Katynskoj tragedii i ee zhertvah” ot 26.11.2010 N 4504–5. Retrieved from:
  • Halbwachs, M. (1980). The Collective Memory. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Hill, C., & Smith, M. (2011). International Relations and the European Union: Themes and Issue. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), International Relations and the European Union (p.3–20). NY.: Oxford University Press.
  • Janowski, K.B. (2014). The Dilemmas of the Eastern Policy of the Republic of Poland. From Dynamic Equilibrium to Imbalance. Przegląd Politologiczny. Political Science Review, 3, p. 119–134.
  • Kalb, D. (2009). Headlines of Nationalism, Subtexts of Class: Poland and Popular Paranoia, 1989–2009. Anthropologica , 51(2), p. 289–300.
  • Keukeleire S., & Delreux T. (2014).The foreign policy of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kubik, J. (2012). Illiberal Challenge to Liberal Democracy. The Case of Poland. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8 (2), p.1–11.
  • Kula, M. (2003). Poland: The Imposed and Rejected Vision of History. The Polish Foreign Affairs Digest, 9 (4), p. 109–135.
  • Kuźniar, R. (2005). A Shift or a Continuation? Polish Foreign Policy after the Elections. The Polish Foreign Affairs Digest, 4 (17), p. 27–39.
  • Larrabee, F.S. (2006). Danger and Opportunity in Eastern Europe. Foreign Affairs, 85 (6), p. 117–131.
  • Lebow, R. N. (2006). The Memory of Politics in Postwar Europe. In R. N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner & C. Fogu (Eds.), The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe (p. 1–40). Durham: Duke University Press.
  • MacDonald, M. (2013). “Constructivism” in Security Studies. In P. D. Williams (Ed.), A Security Studies an Introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Mazurkiewicz, L., & Fedorov, V.(2013).Poland–Russia.Social Diagnosis 2013. Warsaw: Center for Polish–Russian Dialogue and Understanding.
  • Najder, Z., Krzemiński, A., Kuźniar, R., Reiter, J., Szlajfer, H., & Symonides, J. (2005). Balance Sheet of Polish Foreign Policy: A Debate. Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy, 1, p. 275–305.
  • Nets–Zehngut, R., & Bar–Tal, D. (2014).Transformation of the Official Memory of Conflict: A Tentative Model and the Israeli Memory of the 1948 Palestinian Exodus. International Journal of Politics Culture and Society, 27 (1), p. 67–91.DOI: http://10.1007/s10767–013–9147–6
  • Onken, E. (2007). The Baltic States and Moscow’s 9 May Commemoration: Analysing Memory Politics in Europe. Europe–Asia Studies, 59 (1), p. 23–46.
  • Prutsch, M.J. (2013). European Historical Memory: Policies, Challenges and Perspectives. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • Rotfeld, A.D. (2005, January 21).Government information on the Polish foreign policy. Retrieved from:–ec11–40a5–b899–98b58c980959:JCR
  • RIA Novosti, (2011, May 5).Chajka: peredača Polshe materialov katynskogo dela pochti zavershena. Retrieved from:
  • Schwartz, B. (2011). Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of American Memory. In J. K. Olick, V. Vinitzky–Seroussi & D. Levy (Eds.), The Collective Memory Reader (p. 242–248). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shepherd, R. (2007). Separating Twins. The World Today, 63 (10), p. 18–19.
  • Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (1992, 13 November). Oświadczenie o Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski, 36, p.382.
  • Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2000, 12 April). Uchwała w 60. Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski, 12, p.417–418.
  • Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2005, 11 April). Uchwała w 65. Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski, 22, p.585–586.
  • Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (1995, 9 June). Uchwała Upamiętniająca 55 Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski,30, p. 479–480.
  • Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2000, 13 April). Uchwała Upamiętniająca 60. Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski,11, p.374.
  • Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2005, 31 March). Uchwała w 65. Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski,18, p.505–506.
  • Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2007, 14 November). Uchwała Sprawie Upamiętniająca Dnia Pamieci Ofiar Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski,87, p. 3963.
  • Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2010, 9 April). Uchwała Upamiętniająca 70. Rocznicę Zbrodni Katyńskiej. Monitor Polski,21, p.819.
  • Sikorski, R. (2009). Government Information on Polish Foreign Policy in 2008. Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy, 1, p.9–26.
  • Stemplowski, R. (2001). Poland in the World System: Transformation of the Political System and Foreign Policy Making. The Polish Foreign Affairs Digest, 1, p. 95–110.
  • Torkunov, A.V.,& Rotfeld, A.D.(2010). Belye Pjatna–Cernye Pjatna: Sloznye Voprosy v Rossijsko–Pol’skih otnoshenijah. Moscow: Aspect Press.
  • The European Parliament, the Council of Europe (2006, December 12). Decision No 1904/2006/EC. European Commission. Retrieved from:
  • The European Parliament (2008, September 23). European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism. European Parliament. Retrieved from:–//EP//TEXT+TA+P6–TA–2008–0439+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
  • Tucker, J. (2010). Polish Public Opinion towards Russia in the Aftermath of Smolensk. An Opportunity for Improved Relation. PONARS Eurasia. Retrieved from:–memos–pdf/pepm_111.pdf
  • Volkan, V., &Vamik, D. (2001). Transgenerational Transmissions and Chosen Traumas: An Aspect of Large–Group Identity. Group Analysis, 34 (1), p. 79–97. DOI:
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2012). The Remembrance of the Katyń Massacre and the President Lech Kaczyński’s concept of Polish–Russian Relations [2005–2010]. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 41, p. 507–525.
  • Wilkiewicz, Z. (2003). Poland vs. European Identity. The Polish Foreign Affairs Digest, 9 (4), p. 97–108.
  • Zięba, R. (2004). Transformation of Polish Foreign Policy. The Polish Foreign Affairs Digest, 13 (4), p.13–33.


Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart