• facebook
Author: Tomasz Czapiewski
E-mail: tomekczapiewski@gmail.com
Institution: University of Szczecin (Poland)
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 85-98
DOI Address: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016007
PDF: ppsy/45/ppsy2016007.pdf

The article describes and explains the phenomenon of the political myth of Margaret Thatcher – her anti–Scottish attitude and policies and its impact on the process of decomposition of the United Kingdom. The author indicates that the view of Margaret Thatcher’s dominance in Scotland is simplified, stripped of complexity, ignoring significant information conflicting with the thesis, but that also plays an important role in current politics, legitimizing secessionist demands and strengthening the identity of the Scottish community. In the contemporary Scottish debate with its unequivocal defence policy of Thatcher is outside of the discourse, proving its sanctity status. Thatcher could see this special Scottish dimension within the United Kingdom, but treated it rather as a delay in the reforms needed in the country. There are many counterarguments to the validity of the Thatcher myth. Firstly, many negative processes that took place in the 80s were not initiated by Thatcher, only accelerated. Secondly, the Tory decline in popularity in the north began before the leadership of Thatcher and has lasted long after her dismissal. The Conservative Party was permanently seen in Scotland as openly English. Thirdly, there is a lot of accuracy in the opinion that the real division is not between Scotland and England, only between southern England and the rest of the country. Widespread opinion that Thatcher was hostile to Scotland is to a large extent untruthful. She has never retreated radically from any of the Scottish privileges, such as the Barnett formula or the Scottish Development Agency. 

References:

  • Aitken, J. (2013). Margaret Thatcher: Power and Personality. London: A&C Black.
  • Bale, T. (2012). The Conservatives since 1945: The Drivers of Party Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bell, D. (2003). Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity’. British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 63–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045905.  
  • Bottici, C. (2007). A philosophy of political myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bouchard, G. (2013). National myths: constructed pasts, contested presents. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Brown, A. (2014). The myth of the strong leader. Political Leadership in the Modern Age. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brown, A. (2015). Questioning the mythology of the strong leader. Leadership, 11(4), 374–383. DOI: 10.1177/1742715015590066. 
  • Cairney, P. (2012). The Scottish Political System Since Devolution: From New Politics to the New Scottish Government. Luton: Andrews UK Limited.
  • Cairney, P. (2013, April 9) Why was Thatcherism relatively unpopular in Scotland? Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2bRn3up
  • Deacon, D. & Golding, P. (1994). Taxation and representation: The media, political communication and the poll tax. London: John Libbey.
  • Della Sala, V. (2010). Political myth, mythology and the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 1–19.
  • Devine, T. M. (2011). To the Ends of the Earth: Scotland’s Diaspora, 1750–2010. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
  • Finlay, R.J. (2005). Modern Scotland 1914–2000. London: Profile Books.
  • Finlay, R.J. (2012). Patriotism, Paternalism and Pragmatism: Scottish Toryism, Union and Empire, 1912–1965. In: D. Torrance. Whatever Happened to Tory Scotland?(29–42). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Foley, J. & Ramand, P. (2014). Yes: the radical case for Scottish independence. London: Pluto Press.
  • Gamble, A. (2015). The Thatcher myth. British Politics, 10(1), 3–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/bp.2014.20.  
  • Hassan, G. (2012). It’s only a Northern Song: The Constant Smirr of Anti–Thatcherism and Anti–Toryism. In: D. Torrance. Whatever Happened to Tory Scotland? (76–92). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Hassan, G. (2014). Independence of the Scottish Mind: Elite Narratives, Public Spaces and the Making of a Modern Nation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hesse, D. (2014). Warrior Dreams: Playing Scotsmen in Mainland Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, A. (2011). The Two Unions: Ireland, Scotland, and the Survival of the United Kingdom, 1707–2007. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Keating, M. (2010). The government of Scotland: Public policy making after devolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Konieczna, K. (2015). Szkotów sen o niepodległości. Wpływ pamięci historycznej na tożsamość narodową Szkotów. Kwartalnik Prawo – Społeczeństwo – Ekonomia, 1, 65–75.
  • Macwhirter, I. (2013, April 14), Margaret Thatcher: why they should erect her statue outside Holyrood, Ian Macwhirter Blog, Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2bB6Lly
  • Massie, A. (2013). Margaret Thatcher and Scotland: A Story of Mutual Incomprehension. The Spectator, 8 IV 2013.
  • McCormick, C. (2013). From post–imperial Britain to post–British imperialism. Global Discourse, 3(1), 100–114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.804762
  • Mitchell, J. (2005). Scotland: Devolution is Not Just for Christmas’, In A. Trench. The Dynamics of Devolution: The State of the Nation’s 2005, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
  • Mitchell, J. (2014). Scottish question. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitchell, J. & Bennie, L. G. (1995). Thatcherism and the Scottish question. British Elections AZSA& Parties Yearbook, 5(1), 90–104. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13689889508412960. 
  • Oliver, N. (2009). A history of Scotland. London: Orion Publishing.
  • Perchard, A. (2013). “Broken Men” and “Thatcher’s Children”: Memory and Legacy in Scotland’s Coalfields. International Labor and Working-Class History, 84, 78–98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0147547913000252
  • Prokop, J. (1993). Uniwersum polskie. Literatura, wyobraźnia zbiorowa, mity polityczne, Kraków: Universitas.
  • Raffe, A. (2010). 1707, 2007, and the Unionist turn in Scottish history. The Historical Journal, 53(4), 1071–1083. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X10000506
  • Rifkind, M. (2009). Foreword. In: D. Torrance.’We in Scotland’: Thatcherism in a Cold Climate, Edinburgh: Birlinn.
  • Schöpflin, G. (1997). The Functions of Myth and Taxonomy of Myths. In G. Hosking & G. Schöpflin. Myths and Nationhood (19–35). London: Hurst.
  • Sielski, J. (2015). Dobre i złe mity przywódców Polski Ludowej. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Politologica, 9, 14–31.
  • Stewart, D. (2004). Challenging the consensus: Scotland under Margaret Thatcher, 1979–1990. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
  • Tharoor, I. (2014). If Scotland votes for independence, it’ll be Margaret Thatcher’s fault. The Washington Post, 16 IX 2014.
  • Thatcher, M. (1993). The Downing Street Years. London: Harper Collins.
  • Tomaney, J. (2000). End of the empire state? New Labour and devolution in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 675–688.
  • Torrance, D. (2009). ’We in Scotland’: Thatcherism in a Cold Climate, Edinburgh: Birlinn.
  • Torrance, D. (2014). 100 Days of Hope and Fear: How Scotland’s Referendum was Lost and Won. Edinburgh: Luath Press Ltd.
  • Torrance, D. (2015). Nicola Sturgeon: A Political Life. Edinburgh: Birlinn.
  • Whelan, Y. (2016). Heritage, memory and the politics of identity: New perspectives on the cultural landscape. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Zerubavel, Y. (1995). Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

 

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.