Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
Institution: Adam Mickiewicz University
Author: Łukasz Szoszkiewicz
Institution: Adam Mickiewicz University
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 742-751
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/47-4/ppsy2018411.pdf

There is neither consensus whether the category of linguistic rights shall be distinguished, nor international agreement on the catalogue of such rights. Nevertheless, access to education in mother tongue constitutes a core element of most of the international and national frameworks of minority protection. Academic and legal disputes are particularly absorbing in Europe, where linguistic policies frequently intertwine with politics (e.g. Cyprus, Moldova, Ukraine). Thus, it is essential to pose the question, whether the right to education in mother tongue is always granted the equal scope of protection or is such protection differentiated by any additional criteria. Most of all, it shall be considered whether the analyzed right has an independent character or its protection is associated with perception of other fundamental rights and freedoms. This paper investigates the scope of the protection of this right within the framework of the Council of Europe.


  • Access to German Minority Schools in Upper Silesia, Advisory Opinion, 1931 P.C.I.J. (ser. A/B) No. 40 (May 15).
  • Arai, Y., Arai-Takanashi, Y. (2002). The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR, Antwerp, Oxford, New York: Intersentia.
  • Beiter, K. D. (2006). The Protection of the Right to Education by International Law, Leiden-Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Brosig, M., Timofey, A. (2016). Trajectories of Minority Rights Issues in Europe: The Implementation Trap?, New York: Routledge.
  • Case relating to the certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium versus Belgium from 23.071968, nos. 1474/62, 1677/62, 1691/62, 1769/63, 1994/63, 2126/64.
  • Catan v. Moldova and Russia from 19.10.2012, nos. 43370/04, 8252/05, and 18454/06 with partly dissenting opinion of judge A. Kovler.
  • Christoffersen, J. (2009). Fair Balance: A Study of Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Coomans, F. (1988). Clarifying the Core Elements of the Right to Education. Retrieved from:, p. 1 – 15.
  • Council of Europe (1967). Preparatory work on Article 2 of the Protocol to the Convention, 9 May 1967, Strasbourg, CDH(67)2.
  • Cumper, P., Wheatley, S.C. (1999). Minority Rights in the “new” Europe, Hague/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Cyprus v. Turkey from 10.05.2001, No. 25781/94.
  • European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) (2011), Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions and Reports Concerning the Protection of National Minorities. CDL(2011)018, Strasbourg: the Council of Europe.
  • Kiestra, L.R. (2014). The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on Private International Law. Maastricht: Springer.
  • Koch, E.I. (2009). Human Rights As Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights, Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Lenzerini, F. (2014). The Culturalization of Human Rights Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morris, S.P. (2018). Russian Discourses on International Law: Sociological and Philosophical Phenomenon, Abington: Routledge
  • Özersay, K., Gürel, A. (2009). The Cyprus Problem at the European Court of Human Rights [in:] Tocci, N., Diez, T. (eds.) Cyprus: A Conflict at the Crossroads, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Loizidou v. Turkey from 18.12.1996, No. 15318/89.
  • Minority Schools in Albania, Advisory Opinion, 1935 P.C.I.J. (ser. A/B) No. 64 (Apr. 6).
  • Ruiz Vieytez, E.J., Dunbar, R. (2007). Human Rights and Diversity: New Challenges for Plural Societies, Bilbao: Humanitarian Net.
  • Saul, B., Kinely, D., Mowbray, J. (2014). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases and Materials, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schabas, W.A., (2013). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux préparatoires, Volume I – October 1946 to November 1947, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schabas, W.A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Skender v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia from 22.11.2001, No. 62059/00.
  • Vahl, M., Emerson, M. (2004). “Moldova and the Transnistrian Conflict”, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 1, 2004.
  • Woerhling, J.-M. (2005). The European Charter for Regional Or Minority Languages: A Critical Commentary, Strasbourg: The Council of Europe.
  • Yourow, H.C. (1996). The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence, The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart