• facebook
Author: Abdullah Metin Durmuş
Institution: Başkent University (Turkey)
Year of publication: 2019
Source: Show
Pages: 11-35
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2019101
PDF: ppsy/48-1/ppsy2019101.pdf

This article is based on the idea that it is necessary to develop a quantitative method to calculate power of international actors, which will enable scholars to analyse international conflicts. The Global Potential Power Distribution Chart, which is calculated based on three main characteristics of international actors, namely population, territory and economic power, shows “potential power of states and international organisations”. It may be called “Durmuş Scale of Power (DSoP)”. The chart is a comprehensive indicator with considerable accuracy and 100 % objectivity. In this article, potential powers of international actors have been calculated for years 1987, 2004 and 2015, which gives a clear overview of the potential power distribution (balance of power) of the World regarding states and as well as international organisations. Potential military powers of some states and international organisation in year 2015 have also been calculated. This research proves by means of a contemporary approach applied and a quantitative method developed that, the World is multipolar since 2004, and China is, potentially, the most powerful state of the World since 2015. The method introduced in this article were sufficient enough to explain the effects of the enlargement of NATO and EU, EU after BREXIT, reform of the Security Council of the United Nations and instrumental enough to provide a peaceful understanding for the self-determination issue of Kosova. There are three conclusions to this research: 1) The method “Durmuş Scale of Power” is calculated is reliable because everybody with a scientific calculator or a computer can easily calculate potential power of a state provided that he or she has reliable data for territory, population and GDP. 2) “Global Potential Power Distribution Chart” is a comprehensive Chart which shows “balance of power” at a specific year. It enables us to compare power of states and international organisations in different years. 3) It is convenient to use “Durmuş Scale of Power” while analysing issues of international relations.

References:

  • Albrecht-Carrie, René (1973) A Diplomatic History of Europe, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Anderson, Benedict (2006) Imagined Communities, Reflection on the Origin and Spread of National­ism, London: Verso.
  • Ari, Tayyar (2002) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, İstanbul: ALFA Yayınları.
  • Balta, Evren (Editör) (2016) Küresel Siyasete Giriş, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Bely, Lucien (2017) Histoire de France, Firmin Didot: Gisserot.
  • Baylis, John, Smith, Steve and Owens, Patricia (Editors) (2014) The Globalisation of World Politics, an Introduction to International Relations, Italy: Oxford University Press, L.E.G.O.
  • Beitz, Charles R. (1979) Political Theory and International Relations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Bentley, J.H. and Ziegler, H.F. (2000) Traditions & Encounters, Volume B & C, McGraw Hill, Vol. B: S: 675 Vol. C: S: 06, 1048, 1064
  • Boniface, Pascal (2018) La Géopolitique, Paris: Eyrolles.
  • Brzezinski, Zbigniew (2012) Strategic Vision – America and the Crisis of Global Power, New York: Basic Books.
  • Burrel, B. (1996) Pocket Guide to Business & Everyday Math, Springfield: Merriem-Webster.
  • Butterfield, H. (1965) The Origins of Modern Science, New York: The Free Press.
  • Buzan, Barry (1983) People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
  • Der Fisher Weltalmanach 2005” (2005) Frankfurt am Main: Fisher Taschenbug Verlag.
  • Cambridge International Dictionary of English (1995), London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohen-Tanugi, Laurent (2008) The Shape of the World to Come – charting the geopolitics of a new century, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Delvina, Sherif (2003) The Truth on Kosova, Tirane: Eurorilindja.
  • Devlen, Balkan, James, Patrick and Özdamar, Özgür, The English School, International Relations and Progress. International Studies Review (2005) 7, 171–297. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (Editors) (2013) International Relations Theories – Discipline and Diversity, Italy: Oxford University Press, L.E.G.O.
  • Durmuş, A. Metin (2017) Modular System Theory on International Relations (Published as an article in Conference Proceedings Book, on the occasion of DAKAM’s International Political Science Studies Meeting – International Conference on Terrorism and Political Violence, which took place on 7 April 2017 in Istanbul. ISBN: 978–605–9207–70–6).
  • Eralp, Atila (2005) Devlet ve Ötesi – Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Evans, Graham and Newnham, Jeffrey (1998) The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations, London: Penguin Books.
  • Frankel, J. (1973) Contemporary International Theory and the Behaviour of States, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fukuyama, Francis (2004) Devlet İnşası, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Gibbon, Edward (2000) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, London: Penguin Books.
  • Goldstein, Joshua S. (2001) International Relations, Crawfordsville: Longman, R.R. Donnelley and Sons.
  • Gözen, Ramazan (2017) (Editör) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Grifftifths, Martin, Roach, Steven C. and Salamon, M. Scott (2011) (Çev. Cesran) Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Düşünürler ve Teoriler, Ankara: Nobel.
  • Heywood, Andrew (2015) Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations, China: Palgrave.
  • Holsti, K.J. (1972) International Politics, London: Prentice/Hall International.
  • Hughes, W. (1999) Western Civilisation Volume I, Guilford: Dushkin / McGraw Hill.
  • Huntington, Samuel P. (2003) Medeniyetler Çatışması, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
  • Hupchick, D.P. and Cox, H.E. (2001) The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Balkans, New York: Palgrave.
  • Jenkins, Cecil (2017) A Brief History of France, London: Robinson.
  • Kann, Robert A. (1980) A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526–1918, London: University of California Press.
  • Kaplan, A. Morton (1967) System and Process in International Relations, John Wiley and Sons.
  • Kardaş, Şaban ve Balci, Ali (2017) Uluslararası İlişkilere Giriş, İstanbul: Küre.
  • Lang, Kao, Silk Road Diplomacy: China Redefines its Role on the Asia Mainland, International Relations and Diplomacy, July 2018, Vol. 6, No: 7, 408–418.
  • Luttwak, Edward N. (2016) Çin’in Yükselişi – Strateji’nin Mantığına Karşın, İstanbul: Doruk.
  • Malcolm, Noel (1998) Kosovo – A Short History, New York: New York University Press.
  • Mearsheimer, John J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Mingst, Karen A. and Arreguin-Toft, Ivan M. (2014) Essentials of International Relations, 6th Edition, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew (1997) Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51, pp 513–553.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1972) Politics Among Nations, New York: Alfred A. Knoopf.
  • Nevins, Allan, Commager, Henry Steele (2017) ABD Tarihi, Ankara: Douğubati.
  • Nye, Joseph S. (2003) Understanding International Conflicts, New York: Longman.
  • Nye, Joseph S. and Welch David A. (2015) (Çev.: Akman, R.) Küresel Çatışmayı ve İşbirliğini Anlamak, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Ogden, Chris (2016) Hindistan Dış Politikası, İstanbul: İyidüşün.
  • Oxford College Thesaurus (1998), Oxford University Press.
  • Putzger, F.W. – Bruckmuller, E. (2000) Historischer Weltatlas, Wien: öbv-hpt.
  • Ramsbotham, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom ve Miall, Hugh (2012). Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Polity. Cambridge: MPG Books.
  • Russel, Bertrand (1972) A History of Western Philosophy, New York: Touchstone Book.
  • Scott, A.M. (1967) The Functioning of the International Political System, New York: The Macmillan.
  • Smith, Steve, Hadfield, Amelia and Dunne, Tim (2012) Foreign Policy – Theories, Actors, Cases, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Stalker, P. (2004) Oxford A – Z Countries of the World, Oxford University Press.
  • Teeple, J.B. (2002) Timelines of World History, London: DK Publishing.
  • Trachtenberg, Marc, The Question of Realism – A Historian’s View, Security Studies 13, no: 1 (autumn 2003): 156–194.
  • The Economist, Pocket World in Figures (2015) 2016 Edition, London.
  • Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi Marc V. (1999) International Relations Theory, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
  • Walt, Stephan M. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge. (Spring, 1998), pp. 29–32+34–46.
  • Waltz, N. Kenneth (2015) (Çev. Osman S. Binatlı) Uluslararası Politika Teorisi Ankara: Phoenix.
  • Watson, A. (1993). The Evolution of International Society, London: Routledge.

References:

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.