Author: Mateusz Wajzer
Institution: University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland)
Author: Monika Cukier-Syguła
Institution: University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland)
Year of publication: 2020
Source: Show
Pages: 143-157
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/49-2/ppsy2020208.pdf

The purpose of the paper is to concisely present basic applications of game theory models for a scientific description of political violence. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the key theoretical issues including: the assumption of the players’ rationality, the assumption of the players’ common knowledge of their rationality, the Nash equilibrium concept, Pareto optimality, the Nash arbitration scheme and the concept of evolutionarily stable strategies. The second and third parts contain examples of uses of selected models of classical and evolutionary games in the studies on political violence. The following two interaction schemes were used to that end: the Prisoner’s Dilemma and Chicken. The paper ends with a summary and discussion. The key feature of the discussed models is their methodological simplicity, as demonstrated by the lack of need to use complicated mathematical methods. This is why the paper is mainly addressed to individuals who had not studied game theory before or who have insufficient knowledge in the field to conduct own studies.


  • Apter, D.E. (1997). “Political Violence in Analytical Perspective”. In D.E. Apter (Ed.), The Legitimization of Violence (1–32). New York: New York University Press.
  • Bendor, J., Swistak, P. (2001). “The Evolution of Norms”. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1493–1545.
  • Berkovitz, L.D., & Dresher, M. (1959). “A Game-Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War”. Operations Research, 7, 599–620. DOI:
  • Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). “The Prediction of Criminal and Violent Recidivism among Mentally Disordered Offenders: A Meta-Analysis”. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 123–142.
  • Brzezińska, J. (2015). Analiza logarytmiczno-liniowa. Teoria i zastosowania z wykorzystaniem pro­gramu R. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
  • Bueno de Mesquita, E. (2005). “Conciliation, Counterterrorism, and Patterns of Terrorist Violence”. Inter­national Organization, 59(1), 145–176. DOI:
  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (2001). Genes, Peoples and Languages. London: Penguin Books.
  • Danskin, J.M. (1968). “A Helicopter Versus Submarine Search Game”. Operations Research, 16(3), 509–517. DOI:
  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Denninghoff, K.R., Knox, L., Cunningham, R., Partain, S. (2002). “Emergency Medicine: Competencies for Youth Violence Prevention and Control”. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(9), 947–956.
  • Easley, D., Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Euchner, Ch. C. (1996). Extraordinary Politics: How Protest and Dissent Are Changing American Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Farmer, P.E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, S., Keshavjee, S. (2006). “Structural Violence and Clinical Medicine”. PLoS Med, 3(10), e449. DOI:
  • Fry, D.P. (2006). The Human Potential for Peace: An Anthropological Challenge to Assumptions about War and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gin, N.E., Rucker, L., Frayne, S., Cygan, R., Allan Hubbel, F. (1991). “Prevalence of Domestic Violence Among Patients in Three Ambulatory Care Internal Medicine Clinics”. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 6(4), 317–322.
  • Gordon, L. (1988). Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence, Boston, 1880–1960. New York: Viking.
  • Haman, J. (2014). Gry wokół nas. Socjolog i teoria gier. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Kalyvas, S.N. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lapan, H.E., Sandler, T. (1993). “Terrorism and Signaling”. European Journal of Political Economy, 9(3), 83–397. DOI:–2680(93)90006-G.
  • Le Billon, P. (2001). “The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts”. Political Geography, 20, 561–584. DOI:–6298(01)00015–4.
  • Malešević, S. (2010). The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maynard Smith, J., Price, G.R. (1973). “The Logic of Animal Conflict”. Nature, 246, 15–18. DOI: https://
  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Michaels, J.L. (2017). “Social Forces Sustaining the Israeli-Palestinian Tensions: A Dynamical Psychology Perspective”. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 11, 1–17. DOI: UNIBI/ijcv.255.
  • Mider, D. (2013). “The Anatomy of Violence: A Study of the Literature”. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 702–708.
  • Myerson, R.B. (1997). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press.
  • Nash, J.F. (1950). “Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 36 (1), pp. 48–49. DOI:
  • Nash, J.F. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem”. Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.
  • Nash, J.F. (1951). “Non-Cooperative Games”. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2307/1969529.
  • Nieburg, H.L. (1969). Political Violence: The Behavioral Process. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Poleszczuk, J. (2004). Ewolucyjna teoria interakcji społecznych. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Powell, R. (2002). “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict”. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 1–30.
  • Raaflaub, K.A. (Ed.). (2007). War and Peace in the Ancient World. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Rak, J. (2017). “Intrastate, Regional, and Colonial Contributions to Post-2008 Cultures of Political Violence.” Polish Political Science Yearbook 46(1), 1–8. DOI:
  • Rapoport, A., Chammah, A.M. (1966). “The Game of Chicken”. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(3), 10–28.
  • Rapoport, A., Chammah, A.M. (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Riechmann, T. (2014). Spieltheorie. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
  • Sampson, R.J. (1987). “Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption”. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 348–383.
  • Sandler, T., Arce, D.G. (2003). “Terrorism and Game Theory”. Simulation & Gaming, 34(3), 319–337.
  • Schabas, W.A. (2000). Genocide in International Law: The Crimes of Crimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schecter, S., Gintis, H. (2016). Game Theory in Action: An Introduction to Classical and Evolutionary Models. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Schelling, T.C. (1966). Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Schmidt, B.E., Schröder, I.W. (Eds.). (2001). Anthropology of Violence and Conflict. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Seidler, G., Groszyk, H., Pieniążek, A. (2010). Wprowadzenie do nauki o państwie i prawie. Wydawnictwo UMCS: Lublin.
  • Sousa, C.A. (2013). “Political Violence, Collective Functioning and Health: A Review of the Literature”. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, 29(3), 169–197.
  • Springer, S., Le Billon, P. (2016). “Violence and Space: An Introduction to the Geographies of Violence”. Political Geography, 52, pp. 1–3.
  • Straffin, P.D. (1993). Game Theory and Strategy. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
  • Toft, M.D. (2003). The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Vincent, T.L., Brown, J.S. (2005). Evolutionary Game Theory, Natural Selection, and Darwinian Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Walby, S. (2013). “Violence and Society: Introduction to an Emerging Field of Sociology”. Current Sociology, 61(2), 95–111.
  • Walker, L.E. (1997). “Psychology and Domestic Violence Around the World”. American Psychologist, 54 (1), pp. 21–29.
  • Zagare, F.C. (2008). “Game Theory”. In P.D. Williams (Ed.), Security Studies: An Introduction (44–58). London/New York: Routledge.
  • Załuski, W. (2016). “Racjonalność i teoria gier”. In M. Gorazda, Ł. Hardt & T. Kwarciński (Eds.), Metaeko­nomia. Zagadnienia z filozofii ekonomii (277–302). Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
  • Zimring, F.E. (1998). “Toward a Jurisprudence of Youth Violence”. Crime and Justice, 24, 477–501.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart