Author: Joanna Siekiera
Institution: University of Bergen (Norway)
Published online: 30 June 2021
Final submission: 12 March 2021
Printed issue: December 2021
Source: Show
Page no: 9
Pages: 19-27
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/50/ppsy202125_2.pdf

Cooperation in the South Pacific region is unique due to the characteristics of its participants. Following the period of decolonization (1962-1980), countries in Oceania have radically changed. Achieving independence gave those nations international legal personality, yet complete independence from their former colonial powers. The following consequence was gaining an opportunity to draft, adopt and execute own laws in national and foreign policy. PICT (Pacific island countries and territories) have been expanding connections, political and trade ones, within the region since the 1960s when permanent migration of islanders and intra-regional transactions began. Migrations along with foreign aid are considered as the distinctive characteristics of the Pacific Ocean basin. Since the 1980s, the regional integration in Oceania, through establishing regional groupings and increasing the regional trade agreements number, took on pace and scope. The MIRAB synthetic measure (migration, remittances, aid, bureaucracy) has been used in analyzing the Oceania developing microeconomies. Last but not least, migration and foreign aid have been retaining the region from a deeper and more effective stage of regionalism.


  • Australian Agency for International Development. (2006). Pacific 2020: Challenges and Opportunities for Australian Government.
  • Bertram, G. (1999). The MIRAB Model Twelve Years On. The Contemporary Pacific, 11(1).
  • Black, R. (2001). Environmental refugees: myth or reality? University of Sussex.
  • Broich, Ch. (2006). Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. Rhombos.
  • Brown, P. (2012). Australian Influence in the South Pacific. OBE.
  • Brudnicka, J., & Trybuł, W. (Eds.) (2019). Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania państwa w XXI w.
  • Crocombe, R. (2001). The South Pacific. University of the South Pacific.
  • Crocombe, R. (1989). The South Pacific: An Introduction. University of the South Pacific.
  • Denoon, D., & Meleisea, M. (Eds.) (1997). The Cambridge History of the Pacific Islanders. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fickling, D. (2004). Pacific islanders put welfare before independence. The Guardian.
  • Hafez, Z. (2004). The Dimensions of Regional Trade Integration in Southeast Asia. Transnational Publishers Ardsley.
  • Herr, R., & Bergin, A. (2011). Our Near Abroad: Australia and Pacific Islands Regionalism. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
  • Hau’ofa, E. (1994). Our Sea of Islands. The Contemporary Pacific, 6.
  • Hughes, B. (2005). Report on the South Pacific countries. New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, 2.
  • Hooper, A. (2005). Culture and Sustainable Development in the Pacific. ANU E Press.
  • Jędrusik, M. (2005). Wyspy tropikalne: W poszukiwaniu dobrobytu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Jędrzejczyk-Kuliniak, K., Kwieciński, L., Michalski, B., and Stadtmüller, E. (Eds.) (2008). Regionalizacja w stosunkach międzynarodowych; Aspekty polityczno-gospodarcze. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Kleinschmidt, H. (2006). Migration, Regional Integration and Human Security: The Formation and Maintenance of Transnational Spaces. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • Kleer, J. (Ed.) (1998). Globalizacjia gospodarki światowej a integracja regionalna. Konsekwencje dla świata i Polski. Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
  • Lee, H., & Francis, S.T. (2009). Migration and Transnationalism: Pacific Perspectives. ANU E Press.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J. (Ed.) (2015). Aspects of contemporary Asia. Politics, law, media. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • McCall, G., & Connell, J. (1991). The Future of Migration in the Pacific and Asia. International Migration Review, 25(3).
  • Reinalda, B. (Ed.) (2013). Routledge Handbook of International Organization. Routledge.
  • Riegl, M., Landovský, J., and Valko, I. (Eds.) (2014). Strategic Regions in 21st Century Power Politics: Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Siekiera, J. (2015). International law status of the Pacific states. In J. Kawa-Marszałek (Ed.), Aspects of contemporary Asia. Politics, law, media. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Siekiera, J. (2019). Wyzwania dla młodych demokracji na Pacyfiku Południowym. In J. Brudnicka, W. Trybuł (Eds.), Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania państwa w XXI w. Semper.
  • Quanchi, M. (2008). End of an Epoch: Towards Decolonisation and Independence in the Pacific. Agora, 43(4).
  • Ware, H. (2005). Demography, Migration and Conflict in the Pacific. Journal of Peace Research, 42(4).
  • (2020). The world Factbook: Marshall Islands.
  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2020a). Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2020b).
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Glossary of statistical terms.
  • Corruption in Paradise. (2016).
  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, UNESCAP. (2015). Climate Chance and Migration on the Pacific: Links, attitudes, and future scenarios in Nauru, Tuvalu, and Kiribati.
  • Wang, K-Ch., & Bozzato, F. (2014). China in the Pacific Islands: Beyond the ‘Bad Dragon’ Narrative. In M. Riegl, J. Landovský, and I. Valko (Eds.), Strategic Regions in 21st Century Power Politics: Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict (pp. 125-152). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • World Bank. GDP per capita (current US$). (2019).

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart