Author: Krzysztof Malinowski
Institution: Szczecin University
Year of publication: 2014
Source: Show
Pages: 20-34
DOI Address: -
PDF: rop/2014/rop201402.pdf

The transformations of the North Atlantic Alliance in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and its mission in Afghanistan have proceeded hand in hand with the redefining of security interests in individual member states. Poland and Germany have also been affected by a polarization of views, particularly on the nature, place and role of NATO in today’s world. The countries’ geopolitics and their varying visions of European security have significantly affected their positions.

REFERENCES:

  • Busse N., Krieg gegen Russland? Die Nato diskutiert über die Lehren aus dem Georgien- Konflikt, “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”, 3.11.2008.
  • Clinton H., Atlantic Council of the United States, “Hillary Clinton: NATO’s Future”, 22.02.2010.
  • Daalder I., A New Alliance for a New Century, “The RUSI Journal” October/November 2010, Vol. 155, No. 5.
  • Daalder I., Goldgeier J., Global NATO, “Foreign Affairs”, Sept.–Oct. 2006.
  • Górka-Winter B., Madej M., Wstęp, in: B. Górka-Winter, M. Madej (eds.), Państwa członkowskie NATO wobec nowej koncepcji strategicznej Sojuszu. Przegląd stanowisk, The Polish Institute for International Affairs 2010.
  • Hecht T., Germany and its American Nukes, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies Johns Hopkins University, 12.09.2012,.
  • Jäger Th., Dylla D., Ballistic Missile Defense und polnische Sicherheitsinteressen, in: Th. Jäger, D. Dylla (eds.), Deutschland und Polen. Die europäische und internationale Politik, Wiesbaden 2008.
  • Jonson P., The debate about Article 5 and its credibility. What is it all about? Research Paper, Research Division – NATO Defense College 2010, Rome, No. 58.
  • Laborie Iglesias M.A., NATO-EU Cooperation in the Atlantic Alliance’s Future Strategic Concept, Real Instituto Elcano, Area: Security and Defense, “ARI” 2010, No. 25.
  • McNamara S., NATO Summit 2010: Time to Turn Words Into Action, Backgrounder. Published by The Heritage Foundation 2010, No. 2498.
  • Noetzel T., Schreer B., Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change, “International Affairs” 2009, Vol. 85, No. 2.
  • Poland’s Priorities in the Debate on a New Strategic Concept for NATO, “PISM Strategic Files” April 2010, No. 12,.
  • Schreer B., Challenges and prospects for NATO “Complex Operations”, in: Chr. M. Schnaubelt (ed.), Complex Operations: NATO at war and on the margins of war, NATO Defense College “NDC Forum Papers Series”, July 2010.
  • Thränert O., NATO and missile defence: Opportunities and open questions, “CSS Analysis in Security Policy” 2010, No. 86.

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.