Author: Vasylisa Bondarenko
E-mail: vasylisa.bondarenko@gmail.com
Institution: National University of Kyiv
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-8554
Year of publication: 2021
Source: Show
Pages: 13-23
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2021201
PDF: rop/16/rop1601.pdf

The relationship between the two countries has been a complex and diverse subject of investigation and contemplation. The interconnection between the two countries can be described by the following central notions, such as economic cooperation, rivalry in terms of status acquisition of global hegemonic power, particularly in the Pacific region and beyond controversy mutual suspicion over each other’s intentions. Therefore, it is clearly justified that each state has elaborated and adopted a specific manner of conduct and attitude regarding each other as a potential adversary but has meanwhile maintained an extremely strong economic partnership. It is fair to state, that the relationship between both countries has been described by multiple world leaders and academics as the world’s most significant bilateral relationship of the 21st century. Due to the fact that Chinese economy has started to develop increasingly fast and PRC has strengthened its positions on the world’s arena, the United States started to perceive the Middle Kingdom as a direct threat to the established world order in its drive for regional hegemony in East Asia now as well as future aspirant for global supremacy. Beijing, by contrast rejects these notions, and continues its assertive policies and its quest for allies.

REFERENCES:

  • Engin, I. Erden (2002). The ‘Clash of Civilizations’: Revisited after September 11 (According to S. Huntington). Alternatives: The Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No. 2. Accessed on 25th May 2021. Electronic resource. Downloaded from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/19366.
  • Góralczyk, B. (2018). Wielki renesans. Chińska transformacje i jej konsekwencje. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog.
  • Huntington, S.P. (1996). The ‘Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Published by Simon & Schuster (31st May 2007). Accessed on 25th May 2021.
  • Kupś, H., Szatkowski, M., Dahl., M. (ed.). (2021). 70 lat Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej w ujęciu interdyscyplinarnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J. (ed.). (2014). Globalna polityka Chin. Czynniki i perspektywy. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Dmochowski, T. (ed.). (2018). Rozważania o kierunkach współczesnej polityki Chin. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Nordholt, Henk Schulte. “What Are Beijing’s Motivations?: The South China Sea Dispute.” Atlantisch Perspectief, vol. 40, no. 3, 2016, pp. 34-38. Downloaded from: www.jstor.org/stable/48581296.
  • Prezident Bayden i 100 dney strategicheskogo sopernichestva (2021). Electronic resource. Downloaded from: https://www.golosameriki.com/a/biden-presidency-100-dayschina/5873700.html.
  • Shylak, O. (2013). Protystoyannya Yaponiyi ta Kytayu za ostrovy Senkaku. Natsionalʹnyy Universytet «Ostrozʹka akademiya».
  • Sugeno, M., Moriyasu, K. (25th March 2021). Is China a treat to world order? Two analysts explain. Electronic resource. Downloaded from: https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-sPicks/Interview/Is-China-a-threat-to-world-order-Two-analysts-explain.
  • The China Journal (2007). The University of Chicago Press, No. 58, pp. 228-230.
  • Xinhua News Agency ( 2003). Wen Jiabao (PM) Harvard University Speech.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart