Author: Tamara Lozynska
E-mail: tamara.lozynska@pdaa.edu.ua
Institution: Poltava State Agrarian Academy
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2858-9374
Author: Oleksandr Ivanina
E-mail: oleksandr.ivanina@gmail.com
Institution: Uzhhorod National University
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-8473
Year of publication: 2021
Source: Show
Pages: 61-73
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2021303
PDF: rop/17/rop1703.pdf

In the context of democratic discourse, civil society is given a decisive role in the formation of power and influence on power. However, between the authorities (state and self-governing) and public organizations, as representatives of the interests of civil society, mostly subject-object relations are established, where the subject is the government. The article is devoted to finding an answer to the question: can the model of subject-subject relations between the government and civil society, where both social institutions are equal participants in the political process, have practical application? Analysis of social changes in Western Europe and Ukraine gives grounds to support the point of view of those scholars who consider civil society the basis of the state, a factor that gives a specific character to each state formation, regardless of the generality of democratic processes. At the same time, attention is drawn to the heterogeneity of civil society, which is a barrier to its consolidation and strengthening of subjectivity. There is a noticeable increase in competition between the state and civil society in terms of influencing society, as well as the manipulation of public movements by public authorities to achieve political goals. However, a fairly high level of public confidence in public organizations and the potential for their advocacy allow the use of public influence to activate the population and strengthen the position of civil society in relations with the authorities.

REFERENCES:

  • Arato, E., Cohen J. (1996). Vidrodzhennya, zanepad i rekonstruktsiya kontseptsiyi hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva [Revival, decline and reconstruction of the concept of civil society]. Politychna dumka. № 1, pp. 25-31.
  • Balakireva, O.M., Dmytruk D.A. (2021). Tendentsiyi rivnya doviry do derzhavnykh ta sotsialʹnykh instytutiv. Ukrayinsʹkyy sotsium [Trends in the level of trust in state and social institutions. Ukrainian society]. №1 (76), pp. 102-113.
  • Wałdoch, М. (2015). O chojnickim karnawale «Solidarnosci» Chojnice. Варшава: Stowarzyszenie Arcana Historii, 265 с.
  • Weber, Max (2018). Politika, kak prizvaniye i professiya [Politics as a vocation and profession]; translated by Filippov A.F.M.: Ripol-Classic.
  • Giza, S. (2013). Społeczeństwo przed telewizorem, czyli co widać w ramówce. In.: eadem (red.), Gabinet luster. O kształtowaniu samowiedzy Polaków w dyskursie publicznym, Warszawa: Scholar, s. 277-278.
  • Gelston, V.A. (2005). Hromadyansʹke suspilʹstvo y „mystetstvo obʺyednanʹ”. Demokratiya : antolohiya [Civil society and the “art of association”. Democracy: an anthologyї; compiled by O. Protsenko. K.: Smoloskyp, pp. 861-866.
  • Hobbes, T. (1989). Sochineniya v 2 tomakh [Works in 2 volumes]; translation from Latin and English; Compiler, editor of the publication, author’s introductory article and notes by V.V. Sokolov. M.: Mysl.
  • Ivanina, O.V. (2020). Ryzyky ta pereshkody hromadsʹkoyi uchasti na rivni mistsevykh hromad v Ukrayini [Risks and barriers to public participation at the level of local communities in Ukraine]. POLITICUS: a scientific journal. Issue 3. Odessa: Helvetica Publishing House, pp. 31-37.
  • Ivanina, O.V. (2019). Stan normatyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennya rivniv uchasnytstva v Ukrayini [The state of regulatory and legal support of participation levels in Ukraine]. Gilea: scientific bulletin. K.: Gileya Publishing House. Issue 148 (№ 9). Part 3. Political Science, pp. 32-37.
  • Ivanina, Oleksandr V. (2020). Formation of the Policy of Involvement by Local Government Bodies in Territorial Communities of Ukraine. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. №7(3), С. 10-18.
  • Kononenko, S.V. (2012). Demokratyzatsiya v suchasniy systemi mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn i perspektyvy hlobalʹnoho hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva. Istorychnyy dosvid stanovlennya instytutiv hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva v krayinakh Evropy [Democratization in the modern system of international relations and the prospects of global civil society. Historical experience of the formation of civil society institutions in European countries]: a collection of scientific papers; under the general editorship of A.I. Kudryachenko; state institution «Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine». K.: Foliant, pp. 87-98.
  • Locke, John (1985). Sochineniya v 3-kh tomakh [Works in 3 volumes]; editor I.S. Narsky, A.L. Subbotin; translation from English by A.N. Savin. M.: Mysl.
  • Marks, K., Engels, F. (1955). Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D. (ed.). (2019). J. Marszałek-Kawa, D. Plecka (eds.). Dictionary of Political Knowledge. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D., Hołub, A. (eds.). (2018). Social Security. Selected Aspects. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Navrotsky, V.V., Mendzhul, M.V. (2011). Kampaniya advokasi yak instrument demokratychnykh peretvorenʹ [Advocacy campaign as a tool of democratic transformation]. Uzhhorod: Oleksandra Garkusha Publishing House.
  • Nowak, S. (2011). Przekonania i odczucia współczesnych, w: Polaków portret własny. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  • Oharkova, T. (2014). Z zhyttya yevropeytsiv. Sotsialʹni protesty u Frantsiyi. Kontrakt “pershoho naymu” [From the life of Europeans. Social protests in France. «First hire» contract]. Downloaded from: https://www.irf.ua/sotsialni_protesti_u_frantsii_kontrakt_pershogo_naymu/.
  • Otsinka sytuatsiyi v krayini, dovira do instytutiv suspilʹstva ta politykiv, elektoralʹni oriyentatsiyi hromadyan (berezenʹ 2021r.) [Assessment of the situation in the country, trust in the institutions of society and politicians, electoral orientations of citizens (March 2021)]. Ukrainian Center for Economic and Political Studies named after O. Razumkov (2021). Downloaded from: https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/otsinka-sytuatsii-v-kraini-dovira-do-instytutiv-suspilstvata-politykiv-elektoralni-oriientatsii-gromadian-berezen-2021r.
  • Podemski, К. (2014). Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce 25 lat po wielkiej zmianie. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny Rok LXXVI. zeszyt, с. 89-108.
  • Pro mistseve samovryaduvannya v Ukrayini [On local self-government in Ukraine]: Law of Ukraine of 21.05.1997 № 289/97-VR (1997). Downloaded from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.
  • Slovnyk ukrayinsʹkoyi movy: [v 11 tomakh] [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: [in tics; editorial board: I.K. Bilodid (chairman) [et al.]. Volume 2: editors of the volume: P.P. Dotsenko, L.A. Yurchuk (1971). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  • de Tocgueville, Alexis (1999). Pro demokratiyu v Amerytsi [Aboutdemocracy in America].

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart