‘Central Asia’ is a unique and diverse region of the world that landmass distinct from other regions and sedentary civilisation is one of the characteristics. The geography of this region is considered a controversial discourse among scholars in international relations and, Europeans prefer to call them ‘Central Eurasia’, but Asian scholars frequently used the term ‘Central Asia’. However, the history of Asia was not stable and similar in the past. In this regard, this article tries to find the status of the Central Asia in international relations from a historical to empirical discussion in academia. Through the discourse analysis applied here to trace scholars, historians, institutions, governments, and sociologists’ perspective how they treat ‘Central Asia’, whether it is a deeply profound ‘region’ or precise existence. The initial argument says that Central Asia is more significant due to the geostrategic point of view and attracts superpowers in the ground of diplomacy play.
- Balci, B., Kassimova, E. (2015, January 24). How Central Asian Republics Perceive the Emerging Eurasian Union. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from: https://carnegieendowment.org/2015/01/24/how-central-asian-republics-perceive-emerging-eurasian-union-pub-58943.
- Banks, M. (1969). Systems Analysis and the Study of Regions. International Studies Quarterly, 13(4), 335–360.
- Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.
- Bodio, T., Marszałek-Kawa, J. (red.). (2020). Z badań nad historią i współczesnością Rosji, Azji Centralnej i Kaukazu. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
- Brecher, M. (1963). International Relations and Asian Studies: The Subordinate State System of Southern Asia. World Politics, 15(2), 213–235.
- Cantori, L.J., Spiegel, S.L. (1969). International Regions: A Comparative Approach to Five Subordinate Systems. International Studies Quarterly, 13(4), 361–380.
- (2021, December 7). Russia and Eurasia. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/programs/europe-russia-and-eurasia-program/russia-and-eurasia
- Dani, A.H., Masson, V.M. (1992). History of Civilizations of Central Asia. Google Books. Retrieved from: https://books.google.pl/books?id=GXzycd3dT9kC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- Korey, J.L. (2005). Political Science. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 3, 99–107. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00281-4.
- Rossabi, M. (2021, December 7). Central Asia: A Historical Overview. Asia Society. Retrieved from: https://asiasociety.org/central-asia-historical-overview.
- Seabury, P. (1949). The League of Arab States: Debacle of a Regional Arrangement. International Organization, 3(4), 633-642.
- Sinor, D. (2021, November 15). History of Central Asia. Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Central-Asia-102306.
- Thompson, W.R. (1973). The Regional Subsystem: A Conceptual Explication and a Propositional Inventory. International Studies Quarterly, 17(1), 89–117. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/17/1/89/1804221.
- United Nations. (1945). The San Francisco Conference. United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/history-of-the-un/san-francisco-conference.
- com. (2021, December 8). Best Ural-Altaic and Central Asian Studies Colleges in the US. Universities.Com. Retrieved from: https://www.universities.com/programs/ural-altaic-and-central-asian-studies-degrees.
- van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. Retrieved from: http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Principles%20of%20critical%20discourse%20analysis.pdf
- van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352–363). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
- Väyrynen, R. (2003). Regionalism: Old and New. International Studies Review, 5(1), 25–51. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501002.