Author: Taejin Koh
Institution: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Author: Sungeun Choi
Institution: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Author: Jeong Kyung Park
Institution: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Author: Kyungeun Park
Institution: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Year of publication: 2020
Source: Show
Pages: 87-96
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.20.61.3.07
PDF: tner/202003/tner6107.pdf

The aim of this paper is to explore the effectiveness of tandem classrooms in promoting intercultural communicative competence by comparing the competence of students before and after participation in tandem classes. This research is based on the descriptive statistics from a survey administered at a university in South Korea. The survey was conducted in 2016 during the second semester, and it used students who participated in tandem classrooms by employing a questionnaire to measure the effectiveness of the tandem classrooms in relation to intercultural communicative competence and the students’ perception of their own competence after completing the tandem classes. The result of the research shows that unlike the initial expectations, there is no meaningful sign that the surveyed students have developed intercultural communicative competence, which means that tandem classrooms did not actively help students improve this competence. In this study, an in-depth interview with students was also conducted in 2019 to find out why such a result occurred. Although tandem classrooms would be highly valuable as a language learning method, the approach may require redesigning and reimplementation in great detail to become a method for developing intercultural communicative competence. Therefore, this study highlights the underlying need for a revised curriculum for students attending tandem classrooms.

REFERENCES:

  • Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal 56(1), 57-64.
  • Appel, C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: some basic principles and a case study. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 54, Dublin: Trinity College.
  • Appel, M.C. & Mullen T. (2000). Pedagogical considerations for a web-based tandem language learning environment. Computers & Education 34, 291-308.
  • Brammerts, H. (2001). Autonomes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Entwicklung eines Konzepts (Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem: Development of a concept). In Selbstgesteuertes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch (Self-controlled Language Learning in Tandem: A Manual), H. Brammerts, and K. Kleppin (eds.), 9-16. Tübingen: StauffenburgBrammerts.
  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Tandem Centre (2017). Report on Tandem Effect (ACE 4-3-4). Unpublished Report. Busan University of Foreign Studies.
  • Calvert, M. (1992). Working in tandem: peddling an old idea. Language Learning Journal, 6, 17-19.
  • Calvert, M. (1999). Tandem: A vehicle for language and intercultural learning. The Language Learning Journal, 19(1), 56-60. doi:10.1080/09571739985200111
  • Chen, G. M. & Starosta, W. J. (1999). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness. Human Communication, 2, 27-54.
  • Cziko, G.A. (2004). Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal 22(1), 25-39.
  • Elia, A., (2006). Language learning in tandem via skype, The Reading Matrix, 6, 269-280.
  • Kim, D. & Koh, T. (2018). Tandem translation classroom: a case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39, 97-110.
  • Kohn, K. (2013, March). Intercultural communicative competence: an English as a lingua franca perspective. Paper presented at TESOL Arabia, Dubai, UAE.
  • Little, D., & Brammerts, H. (1996). A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional Paper, No. 46, Dublin: Trinity College.
  • Little, D., et al. (1999). Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail. Report on a bilateral project. CLCS Occasional Paper, No. 55, Dublin: Trinity College.
  • Noccetti, S. (2012). Learning L2 English in Tandem Partnerships On-Line. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(7), 1318-1324.
  • Rosanelli, M. (1992). Language in Tandem: Autonomy and Language Acquisition. Merano: Alpha and Beta Verlag.
  • Sabbah-Taylor, A. (2017). Interactional and intercultural competence in tandem learning: A micro-analytic perspective, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle University.
  • Saeideh, A. & Zamanian, J. (2014). Intercultural Communicative Competence in Foreign Language Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(11), 9-16.
  • Schenker, T. (2012). Intercultural Competence and Cultural Learning through Telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449-470.
  • Woodin, J. (2013). Native of Intercultural Speakers? An Examination of Dyadic Conversations between Spanish- and English- Speaking Tandem Learners. In Language and intercultural communication in the new era, Sharifian, F., & Jamarani, M. (eds.). New York: Routledge.
  • Shetzer, H.S. (1997). Critical reflection on the use of e-mail in teaching English as a second language, Unpublished Master thesis, University of Illinois.
  • St John, E., & Cash, D. (1995). German language learning via e-mail: a case study. ReCALL, 7(2), 47-51.
  • Tardieu, C., & Horgues, C. (eds.). (2020). Redefining Tandem Language and Culture Learning in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
  • Woodin, J. (1997). E-mail tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL, 9(1), 22-33.
  • Woodin, J. (2010). Cultural categorisation: what can we learn from practice? An example from tandem learning, Language and Inter-cultural Communication, 10(3), 225-242.
  • Vasallo, M.L., & Telles, J.A. (2006). Foreign language learning in Tandem. Theoretical Principles and Research Perspectives. The ESPecialist 25(1), 1-37.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart