Author: Kokom Komalasari
Institution: Indonesia University of Education, Bandung
Author: Susan Fitriasari
Institution: Indonesia University of Education, Bandung
Author: Diana Noor Anggraini
Institution: Indonesia University of Education, Bandung
Year of publication: 2021
Source: Show
Pages: 85-96
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/202101/tner6307.pdf

This study seeks to analyze the students’ need, the conceptual model, and generate a living values-based digital learning resource model in Civic Education. The research and development design was adopted, with the subjects being junior high school students in Bandung City and West Bandung Regency, Indonesia. The students need living values-based digital learning resources in accordance with 21st century learning and skills. Conceptually, the model of living values-digital based learning resources is one that incorportaes living values and living values education principles into civic education learning materials through various platforms in the Moodle-based Learning Management System (LMS). The model product in the form of a Moodle-based LMS contains teaching materials, living values, media, discussion forums, assignment uploads, and evaluation for the civic education. The model is thought to develop student’s character.


  • Aoun, J.E. (2017). Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. United States: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
  • Arweck, E. & Nesbitt, E. (2004). Living Values: An Educational Program from Initiative to Uptake. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 133-149.
  • BECTA (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2007). Harnessing technology schools survey. Retrieved 04/10/2013. From
  • Bingimlas, K.A. (2009). Barriers to The Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review Of The Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. DOI:10.12973/EJMSTE/75275
  • Blyznyuk, T. (2018). Formation of Teachers Digital Competence: Domestic Challenges and Foreign Experience, Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(1), 40-46. DOI: 10.15330/jpnu.5.1.40-46
  • Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (5t ed). New York: Longman.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate in Research. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Gilakjani, A.P. (2013). Factors Contributing to Teachers’ Use of Computer Technology in the Classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 262-267. DOI: 10.13189/ ujer.2013.010317
  • Hill, J.R. & Hannafin, M.J. (2001) Teaching and learning in digital environments: The Resurgence of Resource-Based Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 49(3), 37-52.
  • Jarolimek, J. (1986). Social Studies in Elementary Educations (7t Ed). New York: Mac.
  • Kearney, A.T. (2016). Global Retail Expansion at A Crossroads-2016 GRDI. Retrieved 10/05/2016 from
  • Komalasari, K & Sapriya. (2016). Living Values Education in Teaching Materials to Develop Students’ Civic Disposition, The New Educational Review, 44(2), 107-124. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2016.44. 2.09.
  • Komalasari, K, & Saripudin, D. (2017). Value-Based Interactive Multimedia Development through Integrated Practice for The Formation of Students’ Character, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16 (4), 179-186.
  • Komalasari, K & Saripudin, D. (2018). The Influence of Living Values Education-Based Civic Education Textbook on Student’s Character Formation, International Journal of Instruction, 11 (1), 395-410. DOI: 10.12973/iji.2018.11127a
  • Komalasari, K & Rahmat. (2019). Living Values Based Interactive Multimedia in Civic Education Learning, International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 113-126. DOI: 10.29333/ iji.2019.1218a.
  • Lickona, T. (2013). Educating for Character How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York-Toronto-London-Sydney-Auckland: Bantam Books
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2009). Beyond Textbooks; Digital Learning Resources as Systemic Innovation In The Noordic Country. Retrieved 29/09/2014 from
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part 1. On The Horizon, 9(5), 3-6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Reiser, R.A., & Ely, D.P. (1997). The Field of Educational Technology as Reflected Through Its Definitions. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45(3), 65-74.
  • Resnick, M. (2002). “Rethinking learning in the digital age” in G. Kirkman (Ed.) In The Global Information Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked World (pp. 32-37). Oxford University Press.
  • Roblyer, M.D. (2003). Integration Educational Technology into Teaching. Columbus, Ohio.
  • Saripudin, D. & Komalasari, K. (2015). Living Values Education in School’s Habituation Program and Its Effect on Student’s Character. The New Educational Review 39(1), 51-62. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.04
  • Seels, B.B. & Richey, R.C. (1994) Instructional Technology: The Definition And Domains Of The Field. AECT, Washington DC.
  • Sommerville, I. (2011). Software Engineering (9t Edition). USA, Pearson.
  • Tillman, D. (2004). Living Values: Activities for Children Ages 8-14. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  • Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times, John Wiley & Sons.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart