Author: Eunika Baron-Polańczyk
Institution: University of Zielona Góra
Year of publication: 2021
Source: Show
Pages: 99-109
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/202103/tner6508.pdf

The article presents a fragment of diagnostic-correlational studies of a quantitative-qualitative nature, establishing pupils’ information competence in the use of ICT in the context of technological trends and accompanying civilisational changes. The research seeks answers to the question why children and teenagers use ICT tools in everyday practice. A diagnostic survey method (questionnaire and interview) and statistical methods were used. 2510 pupils were surveyed, and it was established that: 1) pupils’ numerous indications, obtained through open-ended questions, allowed for distinguishing eight important categories - reasons for using new technologies; 2) main reasons for using ICT lie in activities oriented at handling information (18.5%) and activities involving communication, also through social media (16.7%); 3) calculations of differentiating factors revealed statistical differences in three cases, namely between the opinion on reasons for using ICT by children and teenagers and: gender, stage of education, place of education. The treatment of children and teenagers as important stakeholders of the educational process helps improve it through selection of methods and tools adequate to pupils’ needs, expectations and cognitive preferences.


  • Babbie, E. (2016). Practice of social research. 14t. Ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Bailenson, J. (2020). Why Zoom Meetings Can Exhaust Us. Retrieved 2/06/2021 from
  • Baron-Polańczyk, E. (2019). Reasons for using ICT by children and adolescents in their daily practice (research report). Zielona Góra: University of Zielona Góra Publishing House.
  • Bauman, Z. (2015). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203414934.
  • Berdik, Ch. (2020). Future of Childhood: Revisiting the Potential Uses of Media in Children’s Education. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop - The Report that Started It All. Retrieved 2/06/2021 from uploads/2020/03/jgcc_revisitingpotential.pdf.
  • Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., Tuscano, F.J. (2020). Thinking about Pedagogy in an Unfolding Pandemic: An Independent Report on Approaches to Distance Learning During COVID19 School Closures. Retrieved 2/06/2021 from
  • D’Souza, K. (2020). Distance learning stokes fears of excessive screen time. Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) - A long-term study of children’s brain development and health in the United States. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 2/06/2021 from
  • Ferguson, G.A. & Takane, Y. (2016). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. Warsaw: PWN.
  • Franken, R.E. (2006). Human Motivation. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Frankfort-Nachmias, Ch., Nachmias, D. & DeWaard, J. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: Worth Publishers, a Macmillan Education Company.
  • Gabriel, R. & Röhrs, H.-P. (2017). Social Media. Potenziale, Trends, Chancen und Risiken. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-53991-0.
  • Guerrero, M.D., Barnes, J.D., Chaput, J.-P. & Tremblay, M.S. (2019). Screen Time and Problem Behaviors in Children: Exploring the Mediating Role of Sleep Duration. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 105. doi: 10.1186/ s12966-019-0862-x.
  • Henson, K.T. (2015). Curriculum planning. Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, andeducation reform. USA: Waveland Press.
  • King, B.M. & Minium, E.W. (2003). Statistical reasoning in psychology and education. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Levinson, P. (2013). New New Media. Boston: Pearson.
  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Staksrud, E. (2018). European Research on Children’s Internet Use. Assessing the Past and Anticipating the Future. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1103-1122. doi: 10.1177/1461444816685930.
  • Murphy, K. (2020). Why Zoom is Terrible. The New York Times. Retrieved 2/06/2021 from
  • Orłowska, M., Khyzhna, O., Błeszyński, J.J. (2017). Role of the Internet in the Budget Time Polish Child - Pedagogical Perspective. Education - Technology - Computer Science, 1(8), 255-261. doi: 10.15584/eti.2017.1.35.
  • Pyżalski, J., Zdrodowska, A., Tomczyk, Ł., Abramczuk, K. (2019). Polskie badanie EU Kids Online 2018. Najważniejsze wyniki i wnioski (The Polish EU Kids Online 2018 survey, The most important results and conclusions). Poznań: UAM.
  • Rasfeld, M. & Breidenbach, S. (2014). Schulen im Aufb ruch. Eine Anstiftung. München: Kösel-Verlag.
  • Spitzer, M. (2015). Cyberkrank!: Wie das digitalisierte Leben unsere Gesundheit ruiniert (Cyber sick!: How digitized life is ruining our health). München: DROEMER.
  • Twenge, J.M., Cooper, A.B., Joiner, T.E., Duffy, M.E., & Binau, S.G. (2019). Age, Period, and Cohort Trends in Mood Disorder Indicators and SuicideRelated Outcomes in a Nationally Representative Dataset, 2005-2017. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3(128), 185-199. doi: 10.1037/abn0000410.
  • UNESCO Office Montevideo (2020), Children, adolescents and the use of the Internet in São Paulo and Buenos Aires: studies from a gender equality perspective, Communication and Information Discussion Notebooks, 19(32), 5-41.
  • Van Deursn, A. & Van Dijk, J. (2014). Digital skills: unlocking the information socjety. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wrońska, A. & Lange R. (2017). Nastolatek jako użytkownik Internetu - społeczny wzorzec konsumpcji (Teenager as an Internet User - The Social Pattern of Consumption). In: M. Tanaś (ed.), Nastolatki wobec Internetu (Teens in the Face of the Internet). Warsaw: NASK.
  • Zimbardo, P.G., Johnson, R.L., McCann, V. (2016). Psychology: Core Concepts. USA: Prentice Hall P TR.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart