Author: Kokom Komalasari
Institution: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-5639
Author: Iim Siti Masyitoh
Institution: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-2076
Year of publication: 2022
Source: Show
Pages: 102-113
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.22.67.1.08
PDF: tner/202201/tner6708.pdf

This study seeks to: 1) to generate a product of a living values-based authentic assessment model in civic learning in high school; 2) to test the effectiveness of the model on the character development of students. Research and Development design was employed. Data were collected through questionnaires, attitude scales, interviews, and focus group discussions. An interactive analysis model, quantitative descriptive, and the two-difference test mean were utilised to analyse the data. Participants in the study were Students and Civics Education teachers in ten high schools in Bandung, Indonesia. Results reveal: 1) the model product comprised attitude assessment, self-assessment, and peer assessment which integrates the values of life into the assessment aspects of learning material according to the curriculum; 2) The results of model trials indicate that significant differences arise in the character development of students before and after the application of the model.

REFERENCES:

  • Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Azim, S., & Khan, M. (2012). Authentic Assessment: An Instructional Tool to Enhance Students’ Learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314-320.
  • Burton, K. (2011). A Framework for Determining the Authenticity of Assessment Tasks: Applied to an Example in Law. Journal of Learning Design, 4(2), 20-28. DOI: 10.5204/ jld.v4i2.72
  • Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. (4th edition). Longman.
  • Bourke, R., & Mentis, M. (2013). Self-Assessment as a Process for Inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 854-867. DOI:10.1080/13603116.2011.602288
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Fook, C., & Sidhu, G. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153-161.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate in Research. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2004). A five dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504676
  • Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A Handbook for Educator. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Kearney, S. (2012). Improving Engagement: The Use of ‘Authentic Self-And Peer-Assessment for Learning’ to Enhance The Student Learning Experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 3(7), 875-891. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2012.751963
  • Khaira, H. G., & Yambo, D. (2005). The Practicality of Authentic Assessment. Paper presented at The First International Conference on Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  • Koh, K. H., Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2012). Creating Thinking Schools through Authentic Assessment: The Case in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 24(2), 135-149. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-011-9138-y
  • Koh, K., & Luke, A. (2009). Authentic and Conventional Assessment in Singapore Schools: An Empirical Study of Teacher Assignments and Student Work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 291-318. DOI: 10.1080/09695940903319703
  • Komalasari, K., & Sapriya. (2016). Living Values Education in Teaching Materials to Develop Students’ Civic Disposition. The New Educational Review, 44(2), 107-124. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.09
  • Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2017). Value-Based Interactive Multimedia Development through Integrated Practice for the Formation of Students’ Character. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(4), 179-186.
  • Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2018). The Influence of Living Values Education-Based Civic Education Textbook on Student’s Character Formation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 395-410. DOI: 10.12973/iji.2018.11127a
  • Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2020). Living Values-Based Authentic Assessment in Civic Education in Fostering Student Character. The New Educational Review, 61(3), 168-180. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2020.61.3.14
  • Lickona, T. (2013). Educating for Character How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Bantam Books.
  • Litchfield, B. C., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142(Summer). DOI: 10.1002/ tl.20130
  • Litchfield, B., Mata, J., & Gray, L. (2007). Engaging General Biology Students with Learning Contracts. Journal of College Science Teaching 37, 34-39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017121.pdf
  • Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. North Central College. http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/
  • Pantiwati, Y. (2013). Hakekat Assessment Autentik dan Penerapannya dalam Pembelajaran Biologi (The Nature of Authentic Assessment and Its Application in Biology Learning). Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 1(1), 18-27. DOI: 10.25273/jems.v1i1.773
  • Poikela, E. (2004). Developing Criteria for Knowing and Learning at Work: Towards Context-Based Assessment. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(5), 267-274. DOI: 10.1108/13665620410545543
  • Rohayani, I., Danial, E., Malihah, E., & Sundawa, D. (2018). Authentic Assessment to Enhance Students’ social Responsibility Character. Proceeding of 1st Annual Civic Education Conferences. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 251, 186-188. DOI: 10.2991/acec-18.2018.45
  • Saripudin, D., & Komalasari, K. (2015). Living Values Education in School’s Habituation Program and Its Effect on Student’s Character. The New Educational Review, 39(1), 51-62. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.04
  • Shadish, R. W., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Svinicki, M. (2004). Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom. Jossey-Bass.
  • Tillman, D. (2004). Living Values: Activities for Children Ages 8-14. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  • Vu, T. T., & Dall’Alba, G. (2008). December. Exploring an Authentic Approach to Assessment for Enhancing Student Learning. The Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education Brisbane, Australia.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart