The article presents the results of exploring the purposes of using digital tools to support student learning at universities. This comprises some identified types of digital tools and the frequency of their use by academic staff, which varies due to their level of digital literacy. Then the collected data is provided concerning the numbers of academic staff using basic electronic communication methods. The above data were collected in Polish and Czech universities and later compared to each other. The presented study was conducted over the period 2015–2016 within the IRNet project – International research network for study and development of new tools and methods for advanced pedagogical science in the field of ICT instruments, e-learning and intercultural competences in Poland (University of Silesia, Faculty of Ethnology and Educational Science in Cieszyn) and the Czech Republic (University of Ostrava, Pedagogical Faculty). The undertaken research was aimed at recognizing academic teachers’ activities concerning their support in university students’ learning process.
Allen, LE., & Seaman, ]. (2010). Class dififerences. Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group, The Sloan Consortium. http:// files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ ED529952.pdf
Allen, LE., & Seaman, ]. (2011). Going the distance. Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://WWW.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Documents/going-the-distance.pdf%
Allen, LE., & Seaman, ]. (2012). Growing the curriculum: open education resources in the United States higher education. Babson Survey Research Group. http:/ / www.onlinelearningsurvey. com/oer.html.
Allen, LE., & Seaman,]. (2015). Grade level. Tracking online education in the United States.
Babson Survey Research Group, Quahog Research Group, LLC. http://WWW.onlinelearningsurvey. com/reports/gradelevel.pdf.
Cegarra-Navarro, ].G., & Rodriguez, F.].C. (2012). Factors affecting the use of an e-learning portal at university. ]ournal Educational Computing Research, 46 (1), 85- 103.
Juszczyk, S., & Kim, Y. (2016). Are open education and flexible forms of learning a civilisation requirement or a technological obligation? The New Educational Review, 46, (4), 163-173.
Limniou, M., Holdcroft, C., & Holmes, RS. (2015). Increasing research students' engagement through virtual communities. In: R.D. Wright (ed.). Student-teacher interaction in online learning environments. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 50-75.
Malach, ]., Kostolanova, K., Chmura, M., Ogrodzka-Mazur, E., & Szafrańska-Gajdzica, A. (2016). Social media at Czech and Polish universities: a comparative study. International Joarnal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 5, (1), 41-58.
Maloy, R.W., Verock-O’Loughlin, R-E., Edwards, S.A., & Woolf, BF. (2016). Transforming learning with new technologies. Boston: Pearson Education.
Midgley, S. (2016). What is distance learning? http://WWW.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/ distance-learning/What-is-distance-learning/
Moore, M.G., & Anderson, W.G. (eds) (2003). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http:// distancne.blogspot.cz/
Ogrodzka-Mazur, E., Szafrańska, A., Malach, I., & Chmura, M. (2017). The use of e-learning resources by academic teachers - a Polish-Czech comparative study. The New Educational Review, 50, (4), 169-185.
Powell, A. et al. (2015). iNACOL Blending learning teacher competency framework. http://WWW.inacol.org/resource/inacol-blended-learning-teacher-competency-framework/.
Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2016). Some aspects of increasing the effectiveness and comfort of the scientific and educational process in university electronic environment a research report. The New Educational Review, 45, (3), 259-272.
Woolf, B.P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.