The study presents a secondary analysis of the “Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes, Generic Skills Strand”, the international study of critical thinking skills (OECD, 2012). National secondary analyses include a comparison of student teachers (n = 110) and students of other study programmes (n = 413) in critical thinking and investigates a potential relation of contextual characteristics with their critical thinking performance. Performance Task and Multiple Choice Questions were used to measure critical thinking skills and a Contextual Questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic data, and subjectively evaluated characteristics related to test-taking motivation and coursework. The main results showed that student teachers scored lower in critical thinking performance than students of other study programmes.
Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, ]. R., & Daniels, L. B. (1999).Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285-302.
EACA EURYDICE (2015). Teachers’ and School Heads’ Salaries and Allowances in Europe, 2013/14. Retrieved from: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/facts_and_figures/salaries.pdf
Ennis, R. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18 (2&3), 165-182.
Erwin T. D. (2000). The NPEC Sourcebook on Assessment, Volume 1: Definitions and Assessment Methods for Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Writing. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. CA: The California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement and relationship to critical thinking skills. Informal Logic, 20 (1), 61-84.
Halpern, D. F. (1998).Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53 (4), 449-455.
Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical Thinking. Assessment & Information group of Pearson. Retrieved from: http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingRevieWFINAL.pdf.
LaPoint-O’Brien, T. (2013).Action Research: The Development of Critical Thinking Skills. ERIC Online Submissions. Retrieved from: http://fi1es.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540359.pdf.
NUCEM (2013). Narodna sprava z medzinarodnych Vyskumov PIRLS 2011 a TIMMS 2011. Retrieved from: http://WWW.nucem.sk/documents/20131015_K1ucove_kompetencie_web.pdf
OECD (2015). PISA 2015 - country overview. Retrieved from: http://WWW.compareyourcountry.org/pisa/country/svk
OECD (2012). AHELO Feasibility Study Report, Volume 1, Design and implementation. Retrieved from: http://WWW.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/AHELOFSReportVolume1.pdf.
Nedelova, M. (2015): Assessment and Development of Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills of Bachelor’s Degree Students. (PhD thesis). Banska Bystrica: PF UMB, p. 127. Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Afiects Students, Volume 2, A Third
Decade of Research. San Francisco, CA: Iossey-Bass, 155-212.
Paul, R. W (1992). Critical thinking: What, Why, and how? New Directions for Community Colleges, 1992 (77), 3-24.
Paul, R., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). California teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: Research findings and policy recommendations. ERIC Document #437 379.
Thomas, P. (1999). Critical thinking instruction in selected greater Los Angeles area high schools. Doctoral dissertation, School of Education and Behavioral Studies, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA.
Thompson, C. (2011). Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: Process over Output. International [ournal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 1 (9), 1-7.
Zohar, A. & Dori, Y. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The [ournal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (2) 145-181.