Author: Edyta Charzyńska
Year of publication: 2015
Source: Show
Pages: 84-95
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.07
PDF: tner/201501/tner20150107.pdf

The aim of the study was to examine the relations between variables connected with the reader (interest in the text topic and willingness to read it) and the level of reading comprehension among adults, after controlling for text difficulty. The study involved 1549 users of Polish aged from 18 to 87. Open-ended questions were used to measure reading comprehension. It was proved that the model taking into account variables related to the reader better predicted reading comprehension than the model only taking into account text difficulty. Moderation analysis showed a little stronger relation between text topic interest and reading comprehension in the group of women than in the group of men. It was also noted that among adults with lower levels of education text topic interest and willingness to read it were more strongly related to the level of comprehension than among better educated people. The discussion focuses on the role of psychological factors in reading comprehension.

REFERENCES:

  • Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A. (1974). Sex differences in comprehension of highand low-interest material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 680-687.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Broda, B., Nitoń, B., Gruszczyński, W., & Ogrodniczuk, M. (2014). Measuring readability of Polish texts: Baseline experiments. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Bray, G.B., & Barron, S. (2004). Assessing reading comprehension: the effects of text-based interest, gender, and ability. Educational Assessment, 9 (3-4), 107-128.
  • Chymkowski, R., Koryś, I., & Dawidowicz-Chymkowska, O. (2012). Społeczny zasięg książki w Polsce w 2012 r. Biblioteka Narodowa: Warszawa.
  • Clark, C., & Foster, A. (2005). Children’s and young people’s reading habits and preferences: The who, what, why, where and when. London: National Literacy Trust.
  • Gambell, T., & Hunter, D. (2000). Surveying gender differences in Canadian school literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52 (5), 689-719.
  • Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36 (1), 1-28.
  • Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Hrabí, L., Vránová, O., Machar, I., & Pechanec, V. (2014). Text difficulty in Czech Natural Science Textbooks for the Fourth Grade. New Educational Review, 35 (1), 29-40.
  • Marinak, B.A., & Gambrell, L.B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49 (2), 129-141.
  • Millard, E. (1997). Differently literate: Gender identity and the construction of the developing reader. Gender and Education, 9 (1), 31-49. Morrison, T.G., Wilcox, B., Billen, M.T. Carr, S., Wilcox, G., Morrison, D., & Wilcox,
  • R.T. (2011). 50 Years of “Literacy research and instruction”: 1961-2011. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 313-326.
  • Oakhill, J.V., & Petrides, A. (2007). Sex differences in the effects of interest on boys’ and girls’ reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 223-235.
  • OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do-Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume 1). doi: 10.1787/9789264091450-en
  • OECD (2013). OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264204256-en
  • Oldfather, P., & Wigfield, A. (1996). Children’s motivations to read. In L. Baker, P. Affl erbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 89-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pisarek, W. (1969). Jak mierzyć zrozumiałość tekstu? Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, 4, 35-48.
  • Pisarek, W. (2007). O mediach i języku. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych.
  • RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
  • Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 3-18.
  • Ünal, E. (2010). An analysis of the reading attitudes of elementary school fourth and fifth grade students. New Educational Review, 22 (3-4), 117-127.
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart