Author: Ahmed Thaer
Author: Ghbari Thaer
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 68-77
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.05
PDF: tner/201601/tner20160105.pdf

The presented study aimed at examining the effect of ARCS model on the Achievement Motivation (AM) and Academic Achievement (AA) of the tenth grade students. One hundred and thirteen tenth grade students (28 male, 85 female), divided into two groups (experimental = 50, control = 63), studied a unit about magnetism with the use of two different methods, an ARCS model and a traditional model for 2 weeks. Two instruments were used, a Motivation Achievement Test (MAT) and an Achievement Test (AT). The results showed that there were significant differences on the MAT and AT due to the implemented ARCS motivational model.

REFERENCES:

  • Astleitner, H., Lintner, P. (2004). The effects of ARCS strategies on selfregulated learning with instructional text. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 7 (1). Retrieved from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/Vol7_No1/Fullpaper/Effects_of_ARCS.pdf.
  • Arnone, Marilyn P., Small, Ruth V. (1995). Arousing and Sustaining Curiosity: Lessons From the ARCS Model, 3. In: Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), (17th, Anaheim, CA, 1995).
  • Barlia, L., Beeth, M.E. (1999). High school students’ motivation to engage in conceptual change learning in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March 28-31,1999. Boston: NARST.
  • Beal, C.R., Stevens, R.H. (2007). Student motivation and performance in scientific problem solving simulations. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, & J. Greer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts that work (pp. 539-541). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Broussard, S.C., Garrison, M.E. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family Consumer Science Research Journal, 33(2), 106-120. DOI: 10.1177/1077727X04269573
  • Connie, F. (1997). Motivation to learn. Available at: http://general.utpb.edu/fac/keast_d/tunebooks/pdf/motivation.pdf
  • Covington, M., Teel, K. (1996). Overcoming student failure. Washington: American psychological association.
  • Fairbrother, R.W. (2000). Strategies for learning. In M. Monk and J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching (pp. 7-24). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Feldman, R. (1996). Understanding psycholog. Boston: Mc GrawHill.
  • Feng, S. & Tuan, H. (2005). Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders’ motivation and achievement in learning about acid and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463-484
  • Huett, J. (2006). The effects of ARCS-based confidence strategies on learner confidence and performance in distance education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of North Texas, Denton.
  • Johnson, J.O. (1996). Child psychology. Calabar, Nigeria: Wusen Press Limited.
  • Keller, J.M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction Journal, 26, 1-7. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4160260802
  • Keller, J.M. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Paper presented at VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba, February, 2000.
  • Keller, J., Deimann, M, & Liu, Z. (2005). Effects of Integrated Motivational and Volitional Tactics on Study Habits, Attitudes, and Performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, Florida, October 2005. Kupritz, V. W., Laszlo, F. (Winter, 2003). The Identification of online learning motives in use by undergraduate students. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 45,1, 63-72.
  • Malik, S. (2014). Effectiveness of ARCS model of motivational design to overcome non completion rate of students in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15 (2),194-200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.18099
  • Mart, Ç. (2011). How to sustain students’ motivation in a learning environment. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 519165).
  • Odom, A., & Bell, C. (2015). Associations of middle school student science achievement and attitudes about science with student-reported frequency of teacher lecture demonstrations and student-centered learning. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (1),87-97. DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2015.232a
  • Sandra, D. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
  • Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2006). Self-concept and self-efficacy in mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Paper presented at the17th International Conference on Learning Sciences, Bloomington, Indiana. Song, Sang.,& Keller, John.(1999). The ARCS model for developing motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Retrieved from ERIC (ED 436181).
  • Stewart, C., Bachman, C., Johnson, R. (2010). Students’ characteristics and motivation orientations for online and traditional degree programs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 367-379.
  • Suzuki, K. & Keller, J.M. (1996). Creation and cross-cultural validation of an ARCS motivational design matrix. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Association for Educational Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Turner, S.C. (2012). Changing images of the inclined plane: A case study of a revolution in American science education. Science & Education, 21, 245-270.
  • Woolfolk, Anita (1995). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Zhu, Y., Leung, F.K.S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1189-12.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart