Author: Suciati
Author: Baskoro Adi Prayitno
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 123-133
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.10
PDF: tner/201704/tner20170410.pdf

This research aimed to examine the strategy effectiveness of the Integrating Inquiry-based learning and Student Teams Achievement Division (INSTAD) compared to other strategies: Inquiry; Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD); and conventional learning, in order to narrow Upper Academic Ability (AA) and Lower Academic Ability (AB) science students’ learning outcome gap. As many as 136 research subject, consisting of AA and AB 7th grade students in equal numbers were selected using stratified random sampling from 27 State Junior High Schools in Surakarta, Indonesia. This research employed 4x2 factorial design as a method. Students’ learning results were measured with an essay test, then analyzed using Anakova. Findings demonstrate that INSTAD is the optimum strategy to constrict AA and AB students’ science grade point average, compared to Inquiry, STAD, and conventional learning.

Arslan, C., Ilkoriicii, S., & Seden, M. (2009). Learning and reasoning styles of pre-service teachers’: inductive or deductive reasoning on science and mathematics related to their learning style. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2460-2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.432
Damavandi, M.E., & Shekari, Z. (2010). Effect of mastery learning method on performance and attitude of the weak students in chemistry. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1574-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.327
Gillies, R.M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2012). The effects of two strategic and metacognitive questioning approaches on children’s explanatory behavior, problem-solving, and learning during cooperative, inquiry-based science. International [ournal of Educational Research, 53(1), 93- 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.003
Gurses, A., Gunes, K., Dalga, T., & Dogar, C. (2015). A design practice for interactive direct teaching based on constructivist learning (IDTBCL): Boiling and evaporation. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2377-2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.293
Kim, M.C., & Hannafin, M.]. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers and Education, 56(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
Kwan, Y.W., & Wong, A.F.L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International ]ournal of Educational Research, 70(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006
Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A metaanalysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133- 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
OECD. (2016). Result from PISA 2015: Country note. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Arslan, A. (2014). Examination of the Effects of Model-based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141 , 1187-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.202

Ozden, M. (2008). Improving science and technology education achievement using mastery learning model. World Applied Sciences ]ournal, 5 (1), 62-67. Retrieved from http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj5(1)/10.pdf
Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L.A., long, T. De, Zacharia, Z.C., & Tsourlidaki, E.(2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Prayitno, B.A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students With high and low level academic achievement. [ournal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266-277. Retrieved from http://WWW.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol16/266-277.Prayitno_]BSE_Vol.16_No.2.pdf
Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., ArlinWibowo, ]., Wulandari F, N., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Teachers’ difficulties in implementing thematic teaching and learning in elementary schools. The New Educational Review, 48(2), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.15804/
tner.2017.48.2.16
Royanto, L.R. (2012). The effect of an intervention program based on scaffolding to improve metacognitive strategies in reading: a study of year 3 elementary school students in Jakarta. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1601 - 1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.105
Simsek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 1190-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170
Slavin, RE. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315

Baskoro Adi Prayitno

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart