Author: Katarzyna Kącka
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Author: Joanna Piechowiak-Lamparska
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Author: Bartłomiej Michalak
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 62-74
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201804/tner5405.pdf

Effectiveness in publishing is currently the most important criterion in the process of the evaluation of scientific and research units in Poland. In the national evaluations system for such units, this criterion has the largest relative impact on their final assessment and rating, on the basis of which, in turn, financial resources are allocated. The key question in this context was what factors are correlated with publication effectiveness of employees in the domain of science?
The aim of the analysis was to determine correlations between selected factors such as an employee’s academic title and position in a scientific unit’s hierarchy or their teaching load and their scientific effectiveness as measured by publications. The study was conducted on the entire staff population of the Faculty of Political Sciences and International Studies at Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. As a result, it was found that the selected factors only to a marginal degree were correlated with publication effectiveness in the group studied.


  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Murgia, G. (2015). The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 1– 19. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv037.
  • Bloch, C., & Schneider, J.W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371 – 382. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv047.
  • Cronin, B., & Meho, I. (2007). Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1948– 1959. doi: 10.1002/asi.20667.
  • Engels, T.C., Ossenblok, T.L., & Spruyt, E.H. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000 – 2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373 – 390. doi: 10.1007/s11192– 012– 0680– 2.
  • Fukuzawa, N. (2017). Characteristics of papers published in journals: An analysis of open access journals, country of publication, and languages used. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1007– 1023. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2414-y.
  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251– 261. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.
  • Jeran, A., Kącka, K., & Piechowiak-Lamparska, J. (2017). Publication efficiency in science. suggestions on measures and their application using the case of Poland and Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. The New Educational Review, 49(3), 138 – 153. doi: 10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.11.
  • Jung, J. (2014). Research productivity by career stage among Korean academics. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 85 – 105. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2014.889206.
  • Kącka, K., Michalak, B., & Piechowiak-Lamparska, J. (2018). Impact of scholarly publications and the selected socio-demographic factors. The New Educational Review, 52(2), 165–177. doi: 10.15804/tner.2018.52.2.13.
  • Prathap, G. (2017). Making scientometric sense out of NIRF scores. Current Science, 112(6), 1240– 1242. doi: 10.18520/cs/v112/i06/1240-1242.
  • Puuska, H.M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419– 437. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0037-7.
  • Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2017). Being metric-wise: Heterogeneity in bibliometric knowledge. El Profesional de la Información, 26(3), 480 – 487. doi: 10.3145/epi.2017.may.14.
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 12 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie przyznawania kategorii naukowej jednostkom naukowym i uczelniom, w których zgodnie z ich statutami nie wyodrębniono podstawowych jednostek organizacyjnych. Dziennik Ustaw, poz. 2154 [Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 12 December 2016 on granting of scientific ranks to scientific units and universities in which, pursuant to their statutes, core organizational units have not been d elimited, Journal of Laws, item 2154].
  • Sabharwal, M. (2013). Comparing research productivity across disciplines and career stages. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 141– 163. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2013.785149.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart