Author: Joanna Smyła
Institution: Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 86-97
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201804/tner5407.pdf

This article concerns a significant problem of developing a sexual image among girls during socialization and education as well as its consequences for their position in society and in the job market. Provided analyses deal with the differences between boys and girls with regard to the theory of social construction and they emphasise the role of environmental factors in shaping a sexual image on the part of an individual. The results of research on young females’ situation in the job market conducted among young women and employers have also been discussed by the author with relation to this issue.


  • Barkeley, A.E. (1989). Job interviewer’s dirty little secret, “Wall Street Journal”, 20.03.1989, pp. 1, 14.
  • Bem, S.L. (1987). Gender schema theory and the romantic tradition [w:] Schaver P., Hendrick C., (red.), Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bem, S.L., (1985).Androgyny and Gender Schema Theory: a Conceptual and Empirical Integration. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, red. T.B. Sonderegger, “Psychology and gender”, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln NE.
  • Berger, P.L., Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York, p. 61.
  • Brannon L. (1999), Psychological Perspectives, Second Edition, Allyn & Bacon, a Pearson Education Company.
  • Coppock, V., Haydon, D. Richter, I. (1995). The Illusions of “Post-feminism”. New Women, Old Myths, London .
  • Gergen, K.J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge, New York, Springen – Verlag.
  • Hymowitz, C. (2004). Through the glass ceiling, “Wall Street Journal”, 8.11.2004, p. 1.
  • Hymowitz, C., Schellhardt T.C., (1986). The Glass ceiling. Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs, “Wall Street Journal”, 24.03.1986, special supplement, 1, 4.
  • Kaschack, E., (1996). Engendered Lives. A New Psychology of Women’s Experience, Published by arrangement with Basic Books,
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science, New York, Harper.
  • Mead, M., (2005). In: Patterns of Culture, red. R. Benedict, Routledge&Kegan Paul Ltd, London.
  • Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, Gender and Society, Temple Smith, London.
  • Renzetti C.M., Curran D.J. (2003), Women, men and society, 5th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, Pearson Education Company.
  • Report on equality between women and men, European Commission, Belgium 2005, s. 13.
  • Sherif, C.W. (1982). Needed Concepts in the Study of Gender Identity, “Psychology of Women Quarterly”, no. 6.
  • Sommers, Ch. H. (1994). Who Stole Feminism? The Self Esteem Study. How Women Have Betrayed Women, Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 140.
  • Stoller, R.J. (1968). Sex and Gender, Science House, New York 1968.
  • Unger, R.K. (1979). Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender, “American Psychologist”, 1979, no. 34.

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart