Author: Beata Ecler-Nocoń
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 96-106
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.08
PDF: tner/201602/tner20160208.pdf

The modern family faces a  variety of ever-changing circumstances which greatly inhibit the selection of clearly defined roles or behaviours that might bring about the good of the whole family. The article describes three models which regulate the roles adopted by individuals within the family. The text defines the optimal method of role creation and selection as one which allows for the simultaneous consideration of not only the variety of possibilities, but also the needs of all family members.

REFERENCES:

  • Allen, P., (2006): Manwoman complementarity: The Catholic inspiration. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, no. 9, Summer, pp. 87-108.
  • Bernay, T., Cantord W., (1986). The psychology of today’s women, Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
  • Cunningham, J., roberts, P., (2012). Zakupy na obcasach. Sekrety kobiecych motywacji (original work published in 2006: Inside her pretty little head: A new theory of female motivation and what it means for marketing). PWN. Warszawa.
  • Crosse, e., Marcus, H., (2004). Płeć w myśleniu, przekonaniach i działaniu: podejście poznawcze (Gender in thinking, convictions and actions: a cognitive approach). In: B. Wojciszke (ed.): Kobiety i mężczyźni: odmienne spojrzenie na różnice (Women and men: different perspective on differences). Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Gdańsk, pp. 67-86.
  • Ecler-Nocoń, B., (2013) Wychowanie a płciowość w relacjach międzyludzkich z perspektywy pedagogiki personalistycznej (education and sexuality of people in interpersonal relationships from the perspective of personalistic pedagogy). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Katowice.
  • Ellison, K., (2005). The mommy brain: how motherhood makes us smarter. Basic Books. New york.
  • Jordan, J.V., Kaplan, A.G., Miller, J.B., Stiver, J.P., Surrey, J.L., (1991). Women’s growth in connection. Guilford Press. New york.
  • Lykes, M.B. (ed.), (1985). Gender and personality: Current perspectives on theory and research, duce University Press, durham.
  • Marcus, H., oyserman, d., (1989). Gender and thought: the role of the self-concept. In: M. Crowford, M.Hamilton (ed.), Gender and thought. Springer-Verlag. New york, pp. 100-127.
  • MacInnes, J., (2002). Manly virtues and masculine. http://www.informinc.co.uk/wrong_url.html. Repeated for: z. Melosik, Kryzys męskości w kulturze współczesnej (Crisis of masculinity in Polish Culture), Wydawnictwo Wolumin. Poznań, pp. 10-11.
  • Peschel, M., riedel, C. (1979). Metody podejmowania decyzji kompromisowych w zagadnieniach inżynieryjno-technicznych (The methods of making compromise decisions in engineering-technical issues). Wydawnictwo NaukowoTechniczne. Warszawa.
  • Schaff S., (2007). Vera Nabokova. Portret małżeństwa. (Mrs. Vera Nabokov. Portrait of a marriage). Twój Styl. Warszawa.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart