Author: Klára Šeďová
Year of publication: 2015
Source: Show
Pages: 27-38
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.02
PDF: tner/201501/tner20150102.pdf

This paper addresses the phenomenon of school humor, focusing on the question of how it contributes to shaping teacher-student relationships. Based on an analysis of texts written by lower secondary school students, the paper shows that humor at school serves contradictory functions, such as harmonizing teacherstudent relationships on the one hand, and enabling power negotiation aimed at gaining superiority on the other. Analysis of narrative data has identified a specific phenomenon of festive humor. Within its frame, teacher-student relationships nearly always tend to be harmonized.

REFERENCES:

  • Bakhtin, M.M. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Bariaud, F. 1989. “Age differences in children humor.“ Pp. 13–45 in McGhee, P.E. (ed.). Humor and Children´s Development: A Guide to Practical Applications. New York, London: The Haworth Press.
  • Connelly, F.M., D.J. Clandin, 1990. “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry.“ Educational Researcher 19 (5): 2–14.
  • Coser, L.A. 1964. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press. Dubberley, W.S. 1988. “Humor as resistance.“ International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 1 (2): 109–123.
  • Čejková, I. (2014). Nuda ve škole. Studia paedagogica 19 (3): 155–170.
  • Fine, G.A. 1987. With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fraley, B., A. Aron. 2004. „The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters.“ Personal Relationships 11 (1): 61–78.
  • Freud, S. 1928. “Humor.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9: 1–6.
  • Gruner, Ch., R. 1997. The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Keltner, D., R.C. Young, E.A. Heerey, C. Oemig, N.D. Monarch. 1998. „Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations.“ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (5): 1231–1247.
  • Koller, M.J. 1988. Humor and Society: Explorations in the Sociology of Humor. Houston: Cap and Gown Press. Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
  • Mareš, J. (2013). Nevhodné chování učitelů k žákům a studentům. Studia paedagogica 18 (1): 7–36.
  • Martin, R.A. 2007. The Psychology of Humor. An Integrattive Approach. London, New York: Elsevier.
  • Meeus, W., P. Mahieu. 2009. “You can see the funny side, can´t you? Pupil humour with the teacher as target.“ Educational Studies 35 (5): 553–560.
  • Riessman, C.K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
  • Robinson, D.T., L. Smith-Lovin. 2001. “Getting a laugh: Gender, status and humor in task discussions.“ Social Forces 80 (1): 123–158.
  • Terrion, J.L., S.L. Ertel. 2002. “From “I“ to “we“: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group.“ Human Relations 55 (1): 55–88.
  • Wiltermuth, S.S. & Heath, C. 2009. Synchrony and Cooperation. Psychological Science, 20 (1), 1–5.
  • Woods, P. 1976. “Having a laugh: an antidote to schooling.“ Pp 178–187 in Hammersley, M., P. Woods (eds.). The Process of Schooling. London: Routledge.
  • Woods, P. 1983. “Coping at school through humor.“ British Journal of Sociology of Education 4 (2): 111–124.
  • Wulf, C., M. Bittner, I. Clemens, and I. Kellermann. 2011. “Komunikační praktiky v rámci kultury školy: uplatňování kultury uznání a respektu.“ Studia paedagogica 16 (1): 71–88.
  • Ziv, A. 2010.“The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships.“ Society 47 (1): 11–18.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart