Author: Nebojsa Pavlovic
Institution: University of Kragujevac
Year of publication: 2014
Source: Show
Pages: 266-277
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.14.36.2.21
PDF: tner/201402/tner3621.pdf

This quantitative study aimed at establishing the effect that the type of leadership style adopted by the head teacher has on the employed tutor’s satisfaction. The study sample comprised 11 school head teachers and 109 tutors. The research utilized two tools in the collection of data, the first of which was used for head teachers and the other for tutors in the institution. The research instrument used to collect data in relation to this dependent variable was a Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) questionnaire. This tool comprises 29 questions with Likert-type items that deal with job satisfaction. The results of the study show that the leadership style employed by the head teacher does not affect tutor satisfaction in a statistically significant way.

REFERENCES:

  • Billingsley, B.S. (1993). Teacher retention and attrition in special and general education: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 27(2):137 - 174.
  • Blake, R.R. & Mouton, J.S. (1985). The managerial grid III: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Golf Publishing.
  • Bogler, R. (2001). The Influence of Leadership Style on Teacher Job Satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5):662 - 83.
  • Cerit, Y. (2009). The Effects of Servant Leadership Behaviours of School Principals on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5):600 - 623.
  • Dinham, S. & Scott, C. (2000). Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4):379 - 396.
  • Filak, V.F. & Sheldon, K.M. (2003). Student Psychological Need Satisfaction and College Teacher-Course Evaluations. Educational Psychology, 23(3):235 - 247.
  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principals’ contribution to school effectiveness. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 9 (2):157 - 191.
  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing.
  • Hoppock, R (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: Harper Brothers.
  • Jošanov-Vrgović, I. (2012). Zadovoljstvo poslom i organizaciona privrženost zaposlenih u obrazovnim institucijama. ACIMSI. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.
  • Keng-Boon, O. (2009). TQM and knowledge management: Literature review and proposed framework. Afr. J. of Business Management, 3(11):1014 - 1022.
  • Kusum, S. & Billingsley, B.S. (1996). Intent to stay in teaching. Remedial & Special Education, 17(1):11 - 37.
  • Lashbrook, W (1997). Business performance, employee satisfaction, and leadership practices. Performance Improvement, 36(5):29 - 33.
  • Lee, H.Y. & Ahmad, K.Z. (2009). The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behaviour and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(1):53 - 86.
  • Lewin, K. & Lippitt, R (1938). An Experimental Approach to the study of Autocracy and Democracy: A preliminary Note. Sociometry, 1:292 - 300.
  • Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297 - 1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Robbins, S. (2001). Organizational behavior. 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Robbins, S.P. & Judge T A (2009). Organizacijsko ponašanje. Zagreb: Mate doo.
  • Rosenholtz ,S.J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
  • Rowan, B., Correnti, R. & Miller, R.J. (2002). What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells us about Teacher Effects on Student Achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8):1525 - 67.
  • Schultz, I.L. & Teddlie, C. (1989). The relationship between teacher’s job satisfaction and their perceptions of principals’ use of power and school effectiveness. Education, 109(4): 461 - 468.
  • Taylor, D.L. & Tashakkori, A. (1995). Decision Participation and School as Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Teachers Sense of Efficacy. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2):217 - 230.
  • Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
  • Vujić, D. (2008). Menadžment ljudskih resursa i kvalitet, III izdanje. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
  • Zembylas, M. & Papanastasiou, E. (2004). Job satisfaction among school teachers in Cyprus. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3):357 - 374.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart