Author: Joanna Marszałek-Kawa
Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Author: Danuta Plecka
Institution: University of Zielona Góra
Year of publication: 2019
Source: Show
Pages: 17-26
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201903/tner5701.pdf

It is obvious that the educational system shapes the skill of critical thinking, also in the sphere of the assessment of political phenomena. The educational background of a person determines the kind of decisions he or she makes. These decisions refer to political activity both defined as interest in political issues and manifested in the form of active political participation. The aim of this paper is to identify relations between holding a university degree and political subjectivity. The study, conducted with the use of a survey questionnaire, involved students from the University of Zielona Góra and from the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń.


  • Brennan, J. (2008). Higher education and social change. Higher Education, 56, 381-393.
  • Cortese, A.D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15-22.
  • Dahl, R.A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215.
  • Dahl, R.A. (1998). On Democracy. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
  • Diamond, L. (2002). Consolidating Democracies. In: L. LeDuc, R. Niemis, & P. Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies. New Challenges in the Study and Voting. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Korzeniowski, K. (1993). Alienacja polityczna a uczestnictwo polityczne w warunkach transformacji systemu [Political Alienation and Political Participation in the Conditions of the System Transformation]. In: J. Reykowski (ed.), Wartości i postawy społeczne a przemiany systemowe. Szkice z psychologii politycznej [Social Values and Attitudes and System Changes. Sketches in Political Psychology] (pp. 155-192). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytut Psychologii PAN.
  • Kruikemeier, S., Noort, G. van, Vliegenthart, R. & Vreese, C.H. de (2014). Unraveling the effects of active and passive forms of political Internet use: Does it affect citizens’ political involvement? New Media & Society, 16(6), 903-920.
  • Luvalo L.M. (2014). The Role of Higher Education in Social Transformation and Rural Development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1206-1212.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D. (2018). Political Knowledge as the Basis for Building Mutual Relations in the International Arena. The Case of Poland and Azerbaijan. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 6(1), 20-29.
  • Morison, J. (2007). Models of Democracy: From Representation to Participation? In: J. Jowell, & D. Oliver (Eds.), The Changing Constitution, 6th Edition (pp. 134-156). Oxford University Press.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
  • Sartori, G. (1962). Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne University Press.
  • Sotwin, W. (2003). Podmiotowość w sferze politycznej, czyli pragmatyzm-pryncypializm [Subjectivity in the Political Sphere or Pragmatism-Principlism]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.
  • Thomassen, J.J.A. (2007). Democratic values. In: R.J. Dalton, H.-D. Klingemann (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 418-434). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Turska-Kawa, A. (2011). Political Activation of Young People. On the Importance of the
  • Humanities for Social Practice. In: B. Bokus (ed.). The Humanities Today and the Idea of Interdisciplinary Studies (pp. 267-280). Warsaw: Matrix.
  • Wolfson, M. (n.d.). Active vs. Passive voice: What’s the difference? What should I use? And why does it matter? Retrieved from:

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart