art. 17 EKPC

  • Prawa pamięci w kontekście art. 17 EKPC – prawo do negacjonizmu czy negacjonizm prawa pamięci?

    Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
    Institution: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Year of publication: 2016
    Source: Show
    Pages: 330-348
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/siip201617
    PDF: siip/15/siip1517.pdf

    Memory rights in the context of article 17 ECHR – right to negationism or negationism of the memory rights?

    The objective of the article hereto is to present the mechanisms of the memory rights’ protection within the Strasbourg system, based upon the literal resonance of the European Convention of Human Rights and judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Such topic will be subjected to analysis through the legal-dogmatic method which relies upon the construction of the concrete provisions of the Convention as well as jurisprudence of ECHR. The basic hypothesis of the author is the existence of the double standards of memory rights’ protection against negationism, depending from the type of denied memory right.

  • Does ECHR Prohibition of Abuse of Rights Lead to Contradiction of the Principle of Legality? Considerations upon Judicial Practice of ECtHR

    Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
    Institution: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-3677
    Year of publication: 2019
    Source: Show
    Pages: 113-126
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2019.06.09
    PDF: ppk/52/ppk5209.pdf

    The aim of this article is to resolve an issue whether the Article 17 of the European Con- vention on Human Rights (further referred to as ECHR) contradicts the principle of le- gality within the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights (referred to as ECtHR). The significance of the presented topic does not lie solely within the sphere of academic considerations, but remains of great value for ensuring an adequate level of protection within the Strasbourg system. Moreover, the establishment of the boundar- ies of implementation of Article 17 ECHR is crucial for providence of legal certainty for all its addressees: individuals, states and the groups of persons. The author of present- ed paper poses the hypothesis that the manner of practical usage of Article 17 ECHR leads to contradiction of the principle of legality which remains the core for the rule of law concept. The article relies on the legal dogmatic method as well as elements of his- toric and comparative analysis.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart