ECHR

  • The European Court of Human Rights on Nazi and Soviet Past in Central and Eastern Europe

    Author: Grażyna Baranowska
    E-mail: baranowska.g@gmail.com
    Institution: Polish Academy of Sciences (Poland)
    Author: Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias
    E-mail: aggrabias@gmail.com
    Institution: Polish Academy of Sciences (Poland)
    Year of publication: 2016
    Source: Show
    Pages: 117-129
    DOI Address: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016009
    PDF: ppsy/45/2016009.pdf

    The article demonstrates how references to Nazi and Soviet past are perceived and evaluated by the European Court of Human Rights. Individual cases concerning Holocaust and Nazism, which the Court has examined so far, are compared here to judgments rendered with regard to Communist regime. The article proves that the Court treats more leniently state interference with freedom of expression when memory about Nazism and Holocaust is protected than when a post–Communist state wants to preserve a critical memory about the regime. The authors of the article agree with the attitude of the Court which offers a wide margin of appreciation to states restrictively treating references to Nazism and Holocaust, including comparisons to the Holocaust, Nazism or fascism used as rhetorical devices. At the same time they postulate that other totalitarian systems should be treated by the Court equally. 

  • The Protection of the Right to Education in Minority Language: the Council of Europe’s Standards

    Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
    E-mail: hanna.wiczanowska@amu.edu.pl
    Institution: Adam Mickiewicz University
    Author: Łukasz Szoszkiewicz
    E-mail: l.szoszkiewicz@amu.edu.pl
    Institution: Adam Mickiewicz University
    Year of publication: 2018
    Source: Show
    Pages: 742-751
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018411
    PDF: ppsy/47-4/ppsy2018411.pdf

    There is neither consensus whether the category of linguistic rights shall be distinguished, nor international agreement on the catalogue of such rights. Nevertheless, access to education in mother tongue constitutes a core element of most of the international and national frameworks of minority protection. Academic and legal disputes are particularly absorbing in Europe, where linguistic policies frequently intertwine with politics (e.g. Cyprus, Moldova, Ukraine). Thus, it is essential to pose the question, whether the right to education in mother tongue is always granted the equal scope of protection or is such protection differentiated by any additional criteria. Most of all, it shall be considered whether the analyzed right has an independent character or its protection is associated with perception of other fundamental rights and freedoms. This paper investigates the scope of the protection of this right within the framework of the Council of Europe.

  • Prawa pamięci w kontekście art. 17 EKPC – prawo do negacjonizmu czy negacjonizm prawa pamięci?

    Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
    Institution: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Year of publication: 2016
    Source: Show
    Pages: 330-348
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/siip201617
    PDF: siip/15/siip1517.pdf

    Memory rights in the context of article 17 ECHR – right to negationism or negationism of the memory rights?

    The objective of the article hereto is to present the mechanisms of the memory rights’ protection within the Strasbourg system, based upon the literal resonance of the European Convention of Human Rights and judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Such topic will be subjected to analysis through the legal-dogmatic method which relies upon the construction of the concrete provisions of the Convention as well as jurisprudence of ECHR. The basic hypothesis of the author is the existence of the double standards of memory rights’ protection against negationism, depending from the type of denied memory right.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart