legalizm

  • Legalizm czy oportunizm? – analiza postępowania w sprawie odpowiedzialności konstytucyjnej

    Author: Kamil Dąbrowski
    E-mail: kamil.dabrowski@usz.edu.pl
    Institution: Uniwersytet Szczeciński
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-6260
    Year of publication: 2019
    Source: Show
    Pages: 133-146
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2019.01.07
    PDF: ppk/47/ppk4707.pdf

    The following article discusses the constitutional responsibility proceedings, mainly concentrating on its legalistic or opportunistic character. The author thinks that signalled problem has got fundamental meaning, because its solution may have impact on the interpretations of the other rules. Because of that the author stars his deliberations on the theoretical analysis of the structures of legalism and opportunism. Bearing in mind the aforementioned observations, author of the article prospect for those elements in the Constitution and Tribunal of State’s main bill.

  • Does ECHR Prohibition of Abuse of Rights Lead to Contradiction of the Principle of Legality? Considerations upon Judicial Practice of ECtHR

    Author: Hanna Wiczanowska
    E-mail: hanawicz@gmail.com
    Institution: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-3677
    Year of publication: 2019
    Source: Show
    Pages: 113-126
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2019.06.09
    PDF: ppk/52/ppk5209.pdf

    The aim of this article is to resolve an issue whether the Article 17 of the European Con- vention on Human Rights (further referred to as ECHR) contradicts the principle of le- gality within the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights (referred to as ECtHR). The significance of the presented topic does not lie solely within the sphere of academic considerations, but remains of great value for ensuring an adequate level of protection within the Strasbourg system. Moreover, the establishment of the boundar- ies of implementation of Article 17 ECHR is crucial for providence of legal certainty for all its addressees: individuals, states and the groups of persons. The author of present- ed paper poses the hypothesis that the manner of practical usage of Article 17 ECHR leads to contradiction of the principle of legality which remains the core for the rule of law concept. The article relies on the legal dogmatic method as well as elements of his- toric and comparative analysis.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart