the Sejm,

  • Evolution of the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland

    Author: Grzegorz Koksanowicz
    Institution: The Departament of Constitutional Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-1953
    Year of publication: 2018
    Source: Show
    Pages: 105-115
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2018.06.08
    PDF: ppk/46/ppk4608.pdf

    The subject of this article is to present the evolution of the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm, which covers the time from regaining independence by Poland to 1997 when the current constitution came into force. Assuming that both the scope of the competences connected with the operating of the Sejm and the powers beyond that area decide on the political position of the Marshal, the constitutional and regulatory solutions concerning that office were analysed. The result of those analyses proves that the position of the chairman of the Polish Sejm changed significantly over the analysed time. The changing political trends were the most important factor determining the constitutional and legal position of the Marshal of the Sejm. In the normative perspective they were reflected in the constitutional acts which were binding successively in Poland. The Marshal has always had the status of the constitutional body; however, this fact has not always determined his strong position in the Sejm.

  • Resumption of Voting in the Sejm - A Few Remarks

    Author: Grzegorz Pastuszko
    Institution: University of Rzeszow
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-6409
    Year of publication: 2020
    Source: Show
    Pages: 127-137
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.06.09
    PDF: ppk/58/ppk5809.pdf

    The article is entirely devoted to the issue of adopting the resumption of voting in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. It concerns all the aspects of this institution, starting with genesis, through its systemic ratio legis, and ending with the material premises and the procedural mechanism of its application. The main goal is to analyze the normative content of the legal solutions in force in this area and, at the same time, to present selected experiences of political system practice. Focusing on these elements, the author answers the question of necessity of establishing the Article 189 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, as well as the limits of using the institution of resumption in parliamentary practice. These efforts are accompanied by in-depth reflection on what should be changed in the content of the mentioned provision in order to make resumption an even more effective tool for verifying parliamentary votes.

  • Komisja mediacyjna w parlamencie

    Author: Krzysztof Prokop
    Institution: Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach
    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-4592
    Year of publication: 2021
    Source: Show
    Pages: 79-87
    DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.05.05
    PDF: ppk/63/ppk6305.pdf

    Mediation committee in the parliament

    The subject of the article is the possibility of establishing a mediation committee in the Polish parliament. It is a special type of parliamentary committee responsible for resolving disputes between parliamentary chambers. The need to establish such committee results from the fact that the Senate exercises a number of constitutional powers independently of the Sejm. They include, among others, approval of the election of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights made by the Sejm. This issue became the subject of a long dispute in the Polish parliament. Solutions to this type of problem could be served by a mediation committee composed of representatives of both chambers, which main task would be to work out a compromise solution in the dispute between the Sejm and the Senate. The mediation committee could also facilitate the legislative procedure in the parliament, although in this case the final vote almost always belongs to the Sejm, which may reject amendments or the Senate’s objection to the bill.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart