Methodological Critique in Social Sciences – Chosen Aspects

The work discusses a methodological critique of research concepts, designed and introduced in social sciences, under the positivist and humane paradigms and in ‘mixed’ research. Attention is paid to consecutive stages of a research project (its key points are indicated) and also to needed reflection as well as seeking answers to numerous questions concerning the right structure of projects described in academic articles and monographs.

KRYTYKA METODOLOGICZNA W NAUKACH SPOŁECZNYCH – WYBRANE ASPEKTY

Praca poddaje pod dyskusję krytykę metodologiczną koncepcji badawczych projektowanych i realizowanych w naukach społecznych, w ramach paradygmatów pozytywistycznego, humanistycznego oraz w badaniach „mieszanych”. Zwrócono uwagę na kolejne etapy projektu badawczego (z jego kluczowymi punktami), a także na niezbędną refleksję i poszukiwanie odpowiedzi na liczne pytania dotyczące właściwej konstrukcji projektów opisywanych w artykułach czy też w monografiach naukowych.

BIBLIOGRAFIA:

• Ajdukiewicz, K.(1983).Zagadnienia i kierunki filozofii. Teoria poznania. Metafizyka.Warszawa: Czytelnik.
• Aveyard, H.(2010).Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.).Bershire, England: Open University Press.
• Babbie, E.R.(2013).The Practice of Social Research (13th ed.).Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Boswell, C., & Cannon, S.(2011).Introduction to Nursing Research: Incorporating Evi­dence Based Practice (2nd ed.).Critique Process, chapter 13.Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Bryman, A.(2004).Social Research Methods.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Burns, N., & Grove, S.K.(2001).The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, and Utilization (4th ed.).Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
• Carter, K.(2006).How to Critique Research.Retrieved from: http://www.runet.edu/~kcarter/CourseInfo/nurs442/chapter12.htm.
• Creswell, J.W.(2003).Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) (2010).Retrieved from: www.casp-uk.net/.
• CyberNurse (2005).Reading and Critiquing Research.Retrieved from: http://www.cybernurse.org.uk/research/reading_and_Critiquing_Research.htm.
• Daggett, L., Harbaugh, B.L., & Collum, L.(2005).A Worksheet for Critiquing Quantita­tive Nursing Research.Nurse Educator, 30(6), 255–258.
• Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S.(eds.) (2000).The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Doroszewski, W.(ed.) (2017).Słownik języka polskiego [hasło: krytyka].Warszawa: WN PWN.Retrieved from: http://sjp.pwn.pl/szukaj/krytyka%20.html.
• Dudzikowa, M., & Juszczyk, S.(2017).Pułapki epistemologiczne i metodologiczne w badaniach nad edukacją. Jak sobie z nimi radzić? Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uni­wersytetu Śląskiego.
• American Heritage Dictionaries (2005).
• Firestone, W.A.(1987).Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Educational Researcher, 16(7), 16–21.DOI: 10.3102/0013189X016007016.
• Frankfort-Nachmias, Ch., & Nachmias, D.(2001).Research Methods in the Social Sci­ences.London: Arnold.
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.I.(1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.New York: Adeline.
• Holder, B.(2003).The Research Critique.Retrieved from: http://virtual.clemenson.edu/group/odce/summer1_03/nursT807/pdf.
• Juszczyk, S.(2011).The Scientific Development of the Researcher in the Process of Shaping His Scientific Identity.The New Educational Review, 26(4), 17–29.
• Kuhn, T.(1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Maxwell, J.A.(1996).Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Merriam, S.B.(2009).Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.San Francisco: Josey-Bass: A Wiley Imprint.
• Newman, I., & Ridenour, C.(1998).Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring Interactive Continuum.Southern Illinois University Press.Retrieved from: http://ecommons/udayton.edu./eda_fac_pub/122.
• Palka, S.(2018).Wiązanie podejść metodologicznych w pedagogice teoretyczno-praktyc­znej.Kraków: IMPULS.
• Polit, D.F., & Beck, Ch.T.(2006).Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization (6th ed.).Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Rosenthal, R.(1991).Replication in Behavioral Research.In: J.W.Neuliep (ed.), Replica­tion Research in the Social Sciences (pp.1–39).Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Rodger, B.L.(1997).Guidelines for Critique of Research Reports.Retrieved from: http://www.uwm.edu/~brodg/Handout/critique.htm.
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, Ch.(eds.) (2003).SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Valente, S.(2003).Critical Analysis of Research Papers.Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19(3), 130–142.
• Vance, D.E., Talley, M., Azuero, A., Pearce, P.F., & Christian, B.J.(2013).Conducting an Article Critique for a Quantitative Research Study: Perspectives for Doctoral Students and Other Novice Readers.Nursing Research and Reviews, 3, 67–75.
• Voelker, D.H., & Orton, P.Z.(1993).Cliff’s Quick Review of Statistics.Lincoln: Cliff Notes.
• educationalrev.us.edu.pl. The Website of The New Educational Review.