The Stock Market Channel in the Monetary Policy Transmission Process

  • Author: Magdalena Redo
  • Institution: Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
  • Year of publication: 2018
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 224-235
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2018.59.14
  • PDF: apsp/59/apsp5914.pdf

The growing number of empirical studies proves the existence of the negative relations between short-term interest rates and the stock prices. It points to permeability of the stock market channel in the monetary policy transmission process; it also proves the strength of the central bank instrument which makes it possible to react to disadvantageous turn of events on financial markets (by providing liquidity, easier access to credit or restoring investors’ trust), or to excessive enthusiasm of investors. This confirms the importance of monetary policy in economic policy and is an argument for more frequent use of monetary tools rather than fiscal tools to affect economy. It mainly corresponds to countries with high and/or growing – decade after decade – public debt, as well as with strong impact of the public finance sector on GDP which limits possibilities and development perspective of respective economies as well as lowers flexibility of fiscal policy and its feature of supporting economic processes that is needed not only in the context of shocks. It would be advised to return to actions that were observed before the financial crisis of 2008 in terms of integrating capital markets in Europe and to intensify them – not only due to obvious advantages of improved effectiveness and attractiveness of the European financial market, but also due to expected strengthening of the stock market channel in the monetary transmission policy process as well as the increased effect of monetary policy on economic processes and their effectiveness.

KANAŁ GIEŁDOWY W PROCESIE TRANSMISJI IMPULSÓW POLITYKI PIENIĘŻNEJ

Coraz liczniejsze badania empiryczne dowodzą istnienia negatywnego związku między krótkoterminowym oprocentowaniem a poziomem cen akcji. Wskazuje to na drożność kanału giełdowego w procesie transmisji polityki pieniężnej i dowodzi siły instrumentarium banku centralnego, przy którego pomocy ma on możliwość reagowania na niekorzystny rozwój wydarzeń na rynkach finansowych (przez dostarczanie płynności, ułatwienia w dostępie do kredytu czy przywrócenie zaufania inwestorów) albo na nadmierny entuzjazm inwestorów. Potwierdza to tym samym wagę polityki pieniężnej w polityce gospodarczej i stanowi argument na rzecz silniejszego wykorzystania pieniężnych narzędzi oddziaływania na gospodarkę kosztem fiskalnych. Dotyczy to zwłaszcza państw o wysokich i/lub rosnących z dekady na dekadę długach publicznych oraz silnej ingerencji sektora finansów publicznych w PKB, ograniczających możliwości i perspektywy rozwojowe ich gospodarek oraz obniżających elastyczność polityki fiskalnej i jej zdolność do wspierania procesów gospodarczych, potrzebną nie tylko w sytuacjach szoków. Należałoby więc powrócić do obserwowanych przed kryzysem finansowym z 2008 r. działań w kierunku integracji rynków kapitałowych w Europie i zintensyfikować je – nie tylko z uwagi na oczywiste korzyści w postaci poprawy efektywności i atrakcyjności europejskiego rynku finansowego, ale także z uwagi na oczekiwane dzięki temu wzmocnienie działania i znaczenia kanału giełdowego w procesie transmisji polityki pieniężnej, a tym samym wzrost siły oddziaływania polityki pieniężnej na przebieg procesów gospodarczych i poprawę skuteczności jej działania.

BIBLIOGRAFIA:

  • Andersson, M.(2007).Using Intraday Data to Gauge Financial Market Responses to FED and ECB Monetary Policy Decisions.European Central Bank Working Paper, 726.
  • Angeloni, I., & Ehrmann, M.(2003).Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area: Any Changes After EMU? European Central Bank Working Paper, 240.
  • Bernanke, B.S., & Kuttner, K.N.(2004).What Explains the Stock Market’s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy? NBER Working Paper, 10402.
  • Boivin, J., Kiley, M.T., & Mishkin, F.S.(2010).How Has the Monetary Transmission Mechanism Evolved Over Time? NBER Working Paper, 15879.
  • Bomfim, A.N.(2000).Pre-Announcement Effects, News Effects, and Volatility: Monetary Policy and the Stock Market.Monetary and Financial Market Analysis, October 25.
  • Brandt, M.W., & Wang, K.Q.(2003).Time-Varying Risk Aversion and Unexpected Inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(7), 1457–1498.
  • Campbell, J.Y., & Cochrane, J.H.(1999).By Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior.The Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 205–251.DOI: 10.1086/250059.
  • Chami, R., Cosimano, T.F., & Fullenkamp, C.(1999).The Stock Market Channel of Monetary Policy.IMF Working Papers, 22.
  • Chen, S.S.(2007).Does Monetary Policy Have Asymmetric Effects on Stock Returns? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(2–3), 667–688.
  • Chirinko, R.C., & Schaller, H.(2011a).Fundamentals, Misvaluation, and Business Investment.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(7), 1423–1442.DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00430.x.
  • Chirinko, R.S., & Schaller, H.(2011b).Do Bubbles Lead to Overinvestment?: A Revealed Preference Approach.CESifo Working Paper, 3491.
  • Conover, C.M., Jensen, G.R., & Johnson, R.R.(1999).Monetary Environments and International Stock Returns.Journal of Banking and Finance, 23(9), 1357–1381.DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00007-2.
  • Craine, R., & Martin, V.(2003).Monetary Policy Shocks and Security Market Responses.Berkeley Economics Working Paper.
  • Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M.(2004).Taking Stock: Monetary Policy Transmission to Equity Markets.European Central Bank Working Paper, 354.
  • Farka, M.(2009).The Effect of Monetary Policy Shocks on Stock Prices Accounting for Endogeneity and Omitted Variable Biases.Review of Financial Economics, 18(1), 47–55.DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2008.05.003.
  • Gürkaynak, R., Sack, B., & Swanson, E.(2005).Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? The Response of Asset Prices to Monetary Policy Actions and Statements.Interna­tional Journal of Central Banking, 1(1), 55–93.
  • Hussain, S.M.(2011).Simultaneous Monetary Policy Announcements and International Stock Markets Response: An Intraday Analysis.Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(3), 752–764.DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.002.
  • Ioannidis, C., & Kontonikas, A.(2006).Monetary Policy and the Stock Market: Some International Evidence.Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publica­tion/5080997_Monetary_Policy_and_the_Stock_Market_Some_International_evi­dence.
  • Jensen, M.C.(2004).Agency Cost of Overvalued Equity: European Corporate Govern­ance Institute.ECGI – Finance Working Paper, 39.
  • Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  • Kurov, A.(2010).Investor Sentiment and the Stock Market’s Reaction to Monetary Policy.Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(1), 139–149.DOI: 10.1016/j.jbank­fin.2009.07.010.
  • Kuttner, K.N.(2000).Monetary Policy Surprises and Interest Rates: Evidence from the Fed Funds Futures Markets.Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports, 99.
  • Lobo, B.J.(2000).Asymmetric Effects of Interest Rate Changes on Stock Prices.The Financial Review, 35(3), 125–144.DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6288.2000.tb01424.x.
  • Lobo, B.J.(2002).Interest Rate Surprises and Stock Prices.Financial Review, 37(1), 73–91.DOI: 10.1111/1540-6288.00005.
  • Lunde, A., & Zebedee, A.(2009).Intraday Volatility Responses to Monetary Policy Events.Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 23(4), 383–399.DOI: 10.1007/s11408-009-0114-1.
  • Maio, P., & Tavares, J.(2007).Monetary Policy and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns: Small versus Large and Value versus Growth.Bilkent University Faculty of Business Administration.
  • Mishkin, F.(1995).Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 3–10.
  • Peersman, G., & Smets, F.(2001).The Monetary Transmission Mechanism in the Euro Area: More Evidence from VAR Analysis.European Central Bank Working Paper, 91.
  • Redo, M.(2016).Znaczenie efektu Q Tobina dla skuteczności polityki pieniężnej.Finanse, 1.
  • Redo, M.(2018).Should Central Banks Lean Against the Wind? (forthcoming).
  • Rigobon, R., & Sack, B.P.(2002).The Impact of Monetary Policy on Asset Prices.NBER Working Paper, 8794.
  • Thorbecke, W.(1997).On Stock Market Returns and Monetary Policy.The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 635–654.DOI: 10.2307/2329493.
  • Tobin, J.(1969).A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1(1), 15–29.DOI: 10.2307/1991374.
  • Tobin, J.(1977).Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission Mechanism.Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, 456.
  • Wongswan, J.(2009).The Response of Global Equity Indexes to US Monetary Policy Announcements.Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(2), 344–365.

monetary policy Central Bank transmission mechanism of monetary policy channels of monetary transmission stock market channel Q Tobin effect polityka pieniężna bank centralny mechanizm transmisji polityki pieniężnej kanały transmisji polityki pieniężnej kanał giełdowy efekt Q Tobina

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart