Normative Commitment of the Contemporary Political Theory
- Institution: University of Gdańsk
- Year of publication: 2015
- Source: Show
- Pages: 7–16
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2015.48.01
- PDF: apsp/48/apsp4801.pdf
Basic thesis of the article is the clam, that contemporary developmenttrends of theoretical reflection about politics show ideological associations of a slightly different character and in dimensions separate from those previously connected with classical philosophy of politics. As in the classical form of reflection normative involvement indeed stemmed from care about common well being and urge to search for ideal order model and social organization, current trends of development of political theory – especially postmodernistic influences on social sciences – indicate new forms of bonds with political axiology.
Normatywne zaangażowanie współczesnej teorii politycznej
Zasadniczą tezą artykułu jest twierdzenie, że współczesne trendy rozwojowe teoretycznej refleksji o polityce wykazują asocjacje ideowe o nieco innym charakterze i w innych wymiarach niż dotychczasowe związane z klasyczną filozofią polityczną. O ile w klasycznej formie refleksji zaangażowanie normatywne wynikało zasadniczo z troski o dobro wspólne oraz dążeń do poszukiwania idealnego modelu ładu i porządku społecznego, o tyle obecne trendy rozwojowe teorii politycznej – zwłaszcza wpływy postmodernizmu w naukach społecznych – inicjują nowe formy więzi z aksjologią polityczną.
BIBLIOGRAFIA:
- Anderson C.W. (1983). Political Theory and Political Science: The Rediscovery and Reinterpretation of Pragmatic Tradition, [in:] What Should Political Theory Be Now, J. S. Nelson, (ed.) State New York University Press: Albany.
- Berlin I. (1991). Dwie koncepcje wolności, Res Publica: Warszawa.
- Buckler S. (2002). Normative Theory, [in:] Theory and Methods in Political Science, G. Stoker, D. Marsh, (eds) Palgrave: New York.
- Dahl R. (2007) Normative Theory, Empirical Research and Democracy, [in:] Passion, Craft and Method in Comparative Politics, G. L. Munck, R. Snyder, (eds) The John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
- Dryzek J. S., Honig B., Phillips A. (2008). Introduction, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, A. Phillips, (eds) Oxford University Press: Oxford 2008.
- Easton D. (1969). The New Revolution in Political Science, „American Political Science Review” vol. 63.
- Edelman M. (1997). Veiled Uses of Empirical Theories, [in:] Contemporary Empirical Political Theory, K. R. Monroe (ed.), University of California Press: Berkeley.
- Goodin R. E. (1988). Political Theory as Policy Analysis – and Vice Versa, [in:] Handbook of Political Theory and Policy Science, E. B. Portis, M. B. Levy, (eds) Greenwood Press: Westport.
- Goodin R. E., Klingemann H. D. (1996). Political Science: The Discipline, [in:] A New Handbook of Political Science. R. E. Goodin, H. D. Klingemann (eds) , Oxford University Press: New York.
- N. (1998). The Theory of Transformational Political Movement: Green Political Theory, [in:] Transformational Politics. Theory, Study, and Practice, S. Woolpert, C. D. Slaton, E. W. Shwerin, (eds) State University of New York Press: New York.
- Gunnell J. G., (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
- Guy Peters B. (2005) Institutional Theory in Political Science, Continuum: New York.
- Hauptmann E. (2005). Defining “Theory” in Postwar Political Science, [in:] The Politics of Method in Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, G. Steinmetz, (ed.) Duke University Press: Durham.
- Hawkesworth M. (1988). Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis, State University of New York Press: New York.
- Hawkesworth M. (2006). Contending Conceptions of Science and Politics. Methodology and the Constitution of the Political, [in:] Interpretation and Method. Empirical Research Methods and the interpretative Turn, D. Yanow, P. Schwartz – Shea, (eds) M. E. Sharpe: New York.
- Herman L. (1998). The Theory for Transforming Political Science: The Truth Quest As a Paradigm for Politics, [in:] Transformational Politics. Theory, Study, and Practice, S. Woolpert C. D., Slaton, E. W. Shwerin. (eds) State University of New York Press: New York.
- Karwat M. (2004). Metodologiczne przewartościowania politologów, „Studia Nauk Politycznych” 2004, nr 1.
- Lane R. (1997). Political Science in Theory and Practice. The “Politics Model, M. E. Sharpe: New York.
- Nocoń J. (2010). Przeobrażenia badań politologicznych w świetle neofunkcjonalizmu Jeffreya C. Alexandra. Wydawnictwo UKW: Bydgoszcz.
- O’Brien R. (1998). Normative Versus Empirical Theory and Method, [in:] Methods for Political Inquiry: The Discipline, Philosophy and Analysis of Politics, S. Z.Theodoulou, R. O’Brien (eds). Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
- Palonen K. (2005). Political Theorizing as a Dimension of Political Life, „European Journal of Political Theory”, vol. 4, nr 4.
- Smith R. S. (2007). Applying Theory to Policy and Practice. Methodological Problems and Issues, [in:] Applying Theory to Policy and Practice. Issues for Critical Reflection, R. S. Smith,(ed.) Ashgate Publishing: Hampshire.
- Steinberger P. J. (1985). Ideology and the Urban Crisis, State University of New York Press: New York.
- J. H. (2012), Struktura teorii socjologicznej, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Warszawa.
- Weisberg H. F. (2003). Introduction: The Science of Politics and Political Change, [in:] Political Science: The Science of Politic. H. J. Weisberg (ed.), Agaton Press: New York.
- Zuckert C., Zuckert M. (1997). Empirical Theory 1997. Who Kissing Him-or-Her? [in:] Contemporary Empirical Contemporary Empirical Political Theory, K. R. Monroe,(ed.) University of California Press: Berkeley.
normative theory filozofia polityczna political philosophy postpositivist thought teoria normatywna postpozytywizm