The International Legal Order and Hybrid Wars

This article addresses the urgent issue of hybrid threats within the international legal framework. It examines their implications through the lens of the conflict in Ukraine, Israel and other violations of fundamental principles of international law by authoritarian actors. The author critically evaluates the inadequacy of the current international legal system in dealing with the complex nature of hybrid threats, which exploit vulnerabilities in democratic societies. The article advocates for a comprehensive approach, calling for reforms at national, regional, and international levels to strengthen resilience and establish a more secure and adaptable international system. Throughout the article, various proposals are presented with the aim of reshaping the global security architecture. The author emphasizes the need for a thorough reassessment of existing international norms and institutions, highlighting the urgency of adopting innovative strategies to protect against the sophisticated tactics employed by authoritarian actors in hybrid warfare.

REFERENCES:

• Carment, D., Belo, D. (2018). War’s Future: The Risks and Rewards of Grey-Zone Conflict and Hybrid Warfare. Canadian Global Affairs Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.cgai.ca/wars_future_the_risks_and_rewards_of_grey_zone_conflict_and_hybrid_warfare#Executive.
  
• Colom Piella, G. (2022). NATO’s strategies for responding to hybrid conflicts. CIDOB Report, 08-2022, pp.  47–52. Retrieved from:  https://www.cidob.org/en/articulos/cidob_report/n_8/nato_s_strategies_for_responding_to_hybrid_conflicts.
  
• Countering hybrid threats. NATO website (2023, 18 August). Retrieved from:  https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm.
  
• Howard, L.M. (2022). A Look at the Laws of War – and How Russia is Violating Them. The United States Institute of Peace.
• Joint Declaration on EU-NATO Cooperation. NATO website (2023, 10 January). Retrieved from:  https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_210549.htm?selectedLocale=en.
• Mikac, R., Mitrevska, M., Smajić, M. (2022). Hybrid Threats and Counter-Hybrid Solutions: A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Croatia, North Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Politics in Central Europe, 18(3), pp. 375–395. DOI: 10.2478/pce-2022-0017.
• NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. NATO website (2022, 29 June). Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf.
• NATO’s team of experts on countering hybrid threats concludes its work in Lithuania. Ministry of National Defence Republic of Lithuania website (2021, 13 September). Retrieved from: https://kam.lt/en/natos-teamof-experts-on-countering-hybrid-threats-concludes-itswork-in-lithuania/.
• Procházka, J., Vinkler, P. Jojart, K. et al. (2023). One threat  – multiple responses. Obrana a  strategie (Defence & Strategy), 23(1), pp. 49–73. DOI: 10.3849 /1802-7199.23.2023.01.049-073.
• Report of the UN Secretary General, Mr Kofi Annan, ‘In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All’, 21 March 2005 (General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, A/59/2005).
• Sanz-Caballero, S. (2023). The concepts and laws applicable to hybrid threats, with a special focus on Europe. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 360. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01864-y.
• Soler, C. (2019). The State Obligation to Cooperate under International Law. The Global Prosecution of Core Crimes under International Law, pp. 165–208.
• Statement by the North Atlantic Council marking one year of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. NATO website (2023, 24 February). Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_212268.htm?selectedLocale=en.
  
• Vilnius Summit Communiqué – Issued by NATO Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Vilnius. NATO website (2023, 11 July). Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm?selectedLocale=en.