Pluralizm racjonalności i pluralistyczna krytyka imparcjalizmu

Author: Łukasz Perlikowski
Institution: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Płocku
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 11-28
DOI Address:
PDF: kie/119/kie11901.pdf

The article aims to present and critically analyze one of the currents of thought within the framework of deliberative democracy. The main dispute that we identify in the framework of this theory is the dispute between the impartialist and pluralistic approach. The role of reason towards the phenomenon of pluralism is the subject of these discussions. The impartialists base their arguments above all on the idea of public reason, while pluralists deny its value to other values. It can therefore be concluded that this dispute consists in opposing the rationality of pluralism to the pluralism of rationality. In addition to analyzing the arguments of the pluralist approach, we also focus on the criticism of the impartialism that these positions have put forward. The article distinguishes three possible forms of pluralism: rationality of pluralism, plurality of rationality prima facie and plurality of rationality sensu proprio. This allows us to show the relationship between impartialism (rationality of pluralism) and pluralism (plurality of rationalities prima facie) and the plurality of pluralism proposed by the critics of impartiality (plurality of rationalities prima facie) with a specific form of pluralism (plurality of rationality sensu proprio). In addition, in the article we identify the directives which pluralists propose to take place of public reason. The pluralistic approach which we analyze in the text is presented by such authors as: Iris Marion Young, Seyla Benhabib, Chantal Mouffe, Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. The impartialist tradition should be associated with John Rawles and his interpreters and critics such as Joshua Cohen and Brian Barry.


  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture. Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Benhabib, S. (red.) (1996). Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Dahl, R. (1999). Demokracja i jej krytycy. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
  • Derrida, J. (1999). Chora. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
  • Ferguson, A., Nagel, M. (red.) (2009). Dancing with Iris. The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Feyerabend, P.K. (1996). Przeciw metodzie. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Siedmiogród.
  • Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Gutmann, A., Thompson D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Herrnstein, R.J., Murray, Ch. (1994). The Bell Curve. Inteligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press.
  • Laclau, E., Mouffe Ch. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London New York: Verso.
  • Lakatos, I. (1995). Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Mouffe, Ch. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking The World Politically. London New York: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Ch. (2005). On the Political. London New York: Routledge.
  • Mouffe, Ch. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London New York: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Ch. (1999). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? Social Research, 3(66), s. 745 – 758.
  • Mouffe, Ch. (red.) (1992). Dimensions of Radical Democracy. London New York: Verso.
  • Schmitt, C. (2010). Etyka państwowa i państwo pluralistyczne. Kronos, 2(13), s. 71 – 81.
  • Schmitt, C. (2000). Teologia polityczna i inne pisma. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
  • Szahaj, A. (2000). Jednostka czy wspólnota? Spór liberałów z komunitarystami a „sprawa polska”. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
  • Tischner, J. (2011). Myślenie według wartości. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
  • Tischner, J. (1993). Nieszczęsny dar wolności. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
  • Vattimo, G. (2006). Społeczeństwo przejrzyste. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP we Wrocławiu.
  • Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

impartialism rationality pluralism deliberative democracy political philosophy

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart