Opportunities of Usage: Reflection on Subject and Space in Psychotherapy

Author: Marcela Kościańczuk
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 89-101
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2016.04.06
PDF: kie/114/kie11406.pdf

The article presents an interdisciplinary analysis of possible object’s usage in psychotherapy of adults. It is also focused on the meaning of the area where psychotherapy takes place. The text presents multidimensional view on psychotherapy, which is understood not just as psychological but also socio­cultural phenomenon. The article indicates also a “turn toward the thing” in contemporary humanistic and social studies. Material base of psychotherapy is very important in establishing (crucial for positive impact of psychotherapy) good enough therapeutic relation. Theoretical reflections which bind cultural studies and psychological perspective are crowned by case study of family therapy in which objects and place of therapy were important elements of therapeutic process.

REFERENCES:

  • Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: dialogue and meta­dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26 (4), 415 - 428.
  • Baudrillard, J. (2005). Symulakry i symulacja. Warszawa: sic!
  • Borie, J. (2015). [unpublished lecture „Jouissance. The Power of Objects”, Poznań, January 19].
  • Chrząstowski, Sz., & de Barbaro, B. (2011). Postmodernistyczne inspiracje w psychoterapii. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Critelli, J.W., Neumann, K.F. (1984). The placebo. Conceptual analysis of a construct in transition. American Psychologist, 39 (1), 32 - 39.
  • Day, H., McCain, D., Victoria, M. (1999). Values held by office­based therapists and home­based therapists in Northern New England. Counseling and Values, 43 (2), 116 - 128. DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-007X.1999.tb00134.x
  • de Barbaro, B. (2007). Po co psychoterapii postmodernizm. Psychoterapia, 3 (142), 5 14.
  • Fee, D. (2000). Pathology and the postmodern. Mental illness as discourse and experience. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Froyd, J.E., Lambert, J.D., & Froyd, J.D. (1996). A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 5 (1), 11 - 16.
  • Howard, K.I., Kopta, S.M., Krause, M.S., Orlinsky, D.E. (1986). The dose­effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41 (2), 159 - 164.
  • Jedynak, P., Jahołkowski, P., Filipkowski, R. (2007). Neurogeneza dorosłych a depresja. Neuropsychiatria i neuropsychologia, 2 (2), 57 - 65.
  • Kant, I. (2001). Krytyka czystego rozumu. Kęty: Antyk.
  • Le Doux, J. (2000). Mózg emocjonalny. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
  • Olsen, B. (2013). W obronie rzeczy. Archeologia i ontologia przedmiotów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich.
  • Preißmann, Ch. (2012). Zespół Aspergera. Jak z nim żyć? Jak pomagać? Jak prowadzić terapię? Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Rakowska, J.M. (2006). Skuteczność psychoterapii. Warszawa: Scholar.
  • Seikkula, J., Olson, M.E. (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: its poetics and micropolitics. Family Process, 42 (3), 403 - 418.
  • Sontag, S. (2013). Jak świadomość związana jest z ciałem. Pisma zebrane, vol. II. Warszawa: Karakter.
  • Sontag, S., Cott, J. (2014). Myśl to forma odczuwania. Warszawa: Karakter.
  • Wojnar, A. (2014). Badania nad mózgiem. Retrieved from: http://www2.almamater.uj.edu.pl/114/15.

object psychotherapy therapeutic relation therapy in patient’s house

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart