Bricolage in Scientific Research Practice: An Attempt at Grasping the Meaning of the Concept

Author: Justyna Spychalska-Stasiak
Institution: Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-7469
Year of publication: 2020
Source: Show
Pages: 113-136
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2020.02.07
PDF: kie/128/kie12807.pdf

The article presents the results of analyses aimed at capturing the significance of bricolage emerging from its uses in scientific research practice. The main point of my interest are scientific conceptualizations of the concept of bricolage relating to the practice of defining, characterizing and embedding its meaning in existing theoretical approaches. The empirical basis of the analysis is confined to a set of 47 scientific articles which contain the concept of bricolage in their titles, abstracts, and keywords. Collecting these articles involved searching through such bibliographic databases as Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley, and the Polish National Library Catalogue. The direction of the analysis was inductive and emergent, subordinated to such research issues as: 1. what meanings of bricolage emerge from its use in scientific research practice? 2. how researchers justify the possibility of using bricolage in the practice of social and humanistic research? 3. what theoretical concepts are responsible for creating its meaning? Answering these questions has led me to a reconstruction of three conceptions of bricolage: epistemological bricolage, methodological bricolage, and hybrid bricolage.

REFERENCES:

  • Aduszkiewicz, A. (2004). Słownik filozofii. Warszawa: Świat Książki.
  • Apanowicz, J. (2002). Metodologia ogólna. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Diecezji Pelplińskiej „Bernardinum”.
  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R.E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), pp. 329–366. DOI: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
  • Baláž, V., & Williams, A.M. (2005). International Tourism as Bricolage: An Analysis of Central Europe on the Brink of European Union Membership. International Journal of Tourism Research, 7(2), pp. 79–93. DOI: 10.1002/jtr.514.
  • Bauman, T. (Ed.). (2013). Praktyka badań pedagogicznyc Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
  • Becker, H.S. (1998). Tricks of the Trade. How to Think about Your Research while You’re Doing It? University of Chicago Press.
  • Broom, A. (2009). Intuition, Subjectivity, and Le Bricoleur: Cancer Patients’ Accounts of Negotiating a Plurality of Therapeutic Options. Qualitative Health Research, 19(8), pp. 1050–1059. DOI: 10.1177/1049732309341190.
  • Bulisz, E. (2017). O artykule naukowym słów kilka. Progress: Journal of Young Researchers, 1, pp. 13–21. DOI: 10.4467/25439928PS.17.001.6507.
  • Bush, A., & Silk, M. (2010). Towards an Evolving Critical Consciousness in Coaching Research: The Physical Pedagogic Bricolage. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 5(4), pp. 551–565. DOI: 10.1260/1747-9541.5.4.551.
  • Christians, L.L. (2006). Religious Bricolage in a Legal Perspective between Aporia and Ines­capability. Social Compass, 53(1), pp. 117–123. DOI: 10.1177/0037768606061582.
  • Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutional Bricolage, Conflict and Cooperation in Usangu, Tanzania. IDS Bulletin, 32(4), pp. 26–35.
  • Cochran, E.A. (2012). Bricolage and the Purity of Traditions. Engaging the Stoics for Contem­porary Christian Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics, 40(4), pp. 720–729. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00545.x.
  • Cronin, J., & Malone, S. (2018). Lifeway Alibis: The Biographical Bases for Unruly Bricolage. Marketing Theory, 19(2), pp. 129–147. DOI: 10.1177/1470593118787587.
  • Daipha, P. (2015). From Bricolage to Collage. The Making of Decisions at a Weather Forecast Office. Sociological Forum, 30(3), pp. 787–808. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12192.
  • Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2009). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods (3rd ). Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singapore–Washington DC: Sage Publications.
  • Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2009a). Introduction. The Discipline and Practice of Qualita­tive Research. In: N.S. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods (3rd ) (pp. 1–32). Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singapore–Washington DC: Sage Publications.
  • Desa, G. (2012). Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), pp. 727–751. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x.
  • Di Domenico, M.L., & Haugh, H. (2010). Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), pp. 681–703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x.
  • Drabek, A. (2018). Indeksowanie czasopism w referencyjnych bazach danych. Poradnik dla wydawców czasopism. Poznań: UAM.
  • Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, Ch.C. (2010). Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), pp. 133–151. DOI: 10.1177/0170840609347051.
  • Earl, C. (2017). The Researcher as Cognitive Activist and the Mutually Useful Conversation. Power and Education, 9(2), pp. 129–144. DOI: 10.1177/1757743817714281.
  • Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, Causation and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerg­ing Theories in Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), pp. 1019–1051. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x.
  • Fleck, L. (1986). Powstanie i rozwój faktu naukowego. Wprowadzenie do nauki o stylu myślowym i kolektywie myślowym. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Lubelskie.
  • Flick, U. (2010). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: WN PWN.
  • Freeman, R. (2007). Epistemological Bricolage: How Practitioners Make Sense of Learning. Administration & Society, 39(4), pp. 476–496. DOI: 10.1177/0095399707301857.
  • Gage, N.L. (1989). The Paradigm Wars and Their Aftermath: A “Historical” Sketch of Research on Teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), pp. 4–10. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018007004.
  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2009). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerg­ing Confluences. In: N.S. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualita­tive Research Methods (3rd ) (pp. 191–216). Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singa­pore–Washington DC: Sage Publications.
  • Guo, Z., Zhang, J., & Gao, L. (2018). It Is Not a Panacea! The Conditional Effect of Bricolage in SME Opportunity Exploitation. R&D Management, 48(5), pp. 603–614. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12325.
  • Gutu, D. (2017). Casuals’ Culture: Bricolage and Consumerism in Football Supporters’ Cul­ture. Case Study – Dinamo Bucharest Ultras. Soccer & Society, 18(7), pp. 914–936. DOI: 10.1080/14660970.2015.1067794.
  • Hammersley, M. (1999). Not Bricolage but Boatbuilding: Exploring Two Metaphors for Think­ing about Ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(5), pp. 574–585. DOI: 10.1177/089124199129023569.
  • Hester, J.S. (2005). Bricolage and Bodies of Knowledge: Exploring Consumer Responses to Controversy about the Third Generation Oral Contraceptive Pill. Body & Society, 11(3), pp. 77–95. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X05056192.
  • Howe, K.R. (1992). Getting Over the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate. American Journal of Education, 100(2), pp. 236–257.
  • Illia, L., & Zamparini, A. (2016). Legitimate Distinctiveness, Historical Bricolage, and the Fortune of the Commons. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(4), pp. 397–414. DOI: 10.1177/ 1056492616637917.
  • Johnson, Ch. (2012). Bricoleur and Bricolage: From Metaphor to Universal Concept. Para­graph, 35(3), pp. 355–371. DOI: 10.3366/para.2012.0064.
  • Kaomea, J. (2016). Qualitative Analysis as Ho’oku’iku’i or Bricolage: Teaching Emancipa­tory Indigenous Research in Postcolonial Hawai’i. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), pp. 99–106. DOI: 10.1177/1077800415620222.
  • Kawecki, I. (2006). „Bricolage” w metodologii jakościowych badań edukacyjnych. Prace Naukowe AJD. Pedagogika, 15, pp. 53–62.
  • Kincheloe, J.L. (2011a). Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualita­tive Research. In: K. Hayes, S.R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key Works in Critical Pedagogy (pp. 177–190). Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Kincheloe, J.L. (2011b). On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bri­colage. In: K. Hayes, S.R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key Works in Critical Pedagogy (pp. 253–278). Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Kincheloe, J.L., & Berry, K. (2004). Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Concep­tualizing the Bricolage. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  • Kincheloe, J.L., & McLaren P. (2011). Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research. In: K. Hayes, S.R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key Works in Critical Pedagogy (pp. 285–326). Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Krontoft, A., Fuglsang, L., & Kronborg, H. (2018). Innovation Activity Among Nurses: The Translation and Preliminary Validation of the Bricolage Measure – A Mixed-Method Study. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 38(3), pp. 151–159. DOI: 10.1177/2057158517733931.
  • Kuhn, T. (2009). Struktura rewolucji naukowych. Warszawa: Aletheia.
  • Laurent, P.J. (2005). The Process of Bricolage Between Mythic Societies and Global Moder­nity: Conversion to the Assembly of God Faith in Burkina Faso. Social Compass, 52(3), pp. 309–323. DOI: 10.1177/0037768605055648.
  • Le Loarne, S. (2005). Bricolage versus Creativity. What’s the Difference? Working Paper Serie RMT (WPS 05-02), Grenoble Ecole de Management. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/91b9/2e3dcb664b81c845e9e97dc2127758cccd85.pdf?_ga=2.150490164.384015683.1590595109-2104313570.1590083755.
  • Lèvi-Strauss, C. (1962). The Science of the Concrete. In: C. Lèvi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (pp. 1–22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. (2001). An Emerging New Bricoleur: Promises and Possibilities – A Reaction to Joe Kincheloe’s “Describing the Bricoleur”. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), pp. 693–696. DOI: 10.1177/107780040100700602.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Sin­gapore: Sage.
  • Liu, J. (2019). Ideal Identity Arises from Bricolage: Identity Issues in Patrick White’s ‘The Twyborn Affair’. Comparative Literature: East & West, 3(1), pp. 68–78. DOI: 10.1080/25723618.2019.1614845.
  • MacKenzie, D., & Pardo-Guerra, J.P. (2014). Insurgent Capitalism: Island, Bricolage and the Re-making of Finance. Economy & Society, 43(2), pp. 153–182. DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2014.881597.
  • Madge, C. (2017). Creative Geographies and Living on from Breast Cancer: The Enlivening Potential of Autobiographical Bricolage for an Aesthetics of Precarity. TIBG, 43(2), pp. 245–261. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12215.
  • McMillan, K. (2015). The Critical Bricolage: Uniquely Advancing Organizational and Nursing Knowledge on the Subject of Rapid and Continuous Change in Health Care. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4), pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/1609406915611550.
  • Nelson, C., Treichler, P.A., & Grossberg L. (1992). Cultural Studies. An Introduction. In: L. Gross­berg, C. Nelson, & P.A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
  • Nyika, L., & Murray-Orr, A. (2017). Critical Race Theory-Social Constructivist Bricolage: A Health-Promoting Schools Research Methodology. Health Education Journal, 76(4), pp. 432–441. DOI: 10.1177/0017896916689108.
  • Papson, S. (2014). Scholars, Intellectuals, and Bricoleurs. Arts & Humanities in Higher Educa­tion, 13(4), pp. 377–394. DOI: 10.1177/ 1474022213487951.
  • Phillimore, J., Bradby, H., Doos, L., Padilla, B., & Samerski, S. (2018). Health Providers as Brico­leurs: An Examination of the Adaption of Health Ecosystems to Superdiversity in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(3), pp. 361–375. DOI: 10.1177/0958928718795994.
  • Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. (2007). Opportunity Recognition, Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Bricolage: Connecting Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship in Strategic Organiza­tion. Strategic Organization, 5(3), pp. 313–320. DOI: 10.1177/ 1476127007079956.
  • Rubacha, K. (2013). Metodologiczna analiza praktyki badań pedagogicznych. In: T. Bauman (Ed.), Praktyka badań pedagogicznych (pp. 69–81). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
  • Russell, R., & Tyler, M. (2005). Branding and Bricolage: Gender, Consumption and Transition. Childhood, 12(2), pp. 221–237. DOI: 10.1177/0907568205051905.
  • Sadoń-Osowiecka, T. (2009). Bricolage jako konstruktywistyczne podejście do badań eduka­cyjnych. Patchwork o bricolage’u. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 5(10), pp. 72–81.
  • Saroglou, V. (2006). Religious Bricolage as a Psychological Reality: Limits, Structures and Dynamics. Social Compass, 53(1), pp. 109–115. DOI: 10.1177.0037768606061581.
  • Saumure, K., & Given, J.M. (2008). Rigor in Qualitative Research. In: L.M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 795–796). Los Angeles–Lon­don–New Delhi–Singapore: Sage.
  • Snow, Ch.P. (1999). Dwie kultury. Z przedmową Stefana Colliniego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prószyński i S-ka.
  • Stinchfield, B.T., Nelson, R.E., & Wood, M.S. (2013). Learning from Levi-Strauss’ Legacy: Art, Craft, Engineering, Bricolage, and Brokerage in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), pp. 889–921. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00523.x.
  • Sztompka, P. (1973). Teoria i wyjaśnienie. Z metodologicznych problemów socjologii. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Tam, P.Ch. (2012). Children’s Bricolage under the Gaze of Teachers in Sociodramatic Play. Childhood, 20(2), pp. 244–259. DOI: 10.1177/0907568212461036.
  • The Ordinance of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of February 22, 2019. https://tiny.pl/79bhs. [03.01.2020].
  • Tlili, A. (2016). Encountering the Creative Museum: Museographic Creativeness and the ‘Bri­colage’ of Time Materials. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(5), pp. 443–458. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1031068.
  • Turnbull, S. (2002). Bricolage as an Alternative Approach to Human Resource Development Theory Building. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), pp. 111–128. DOI: 10.1177/1534484302011006.
  • Valliere, D., & Gegenhuber, T. (2014). Entrepreneurial Remixing: Bricolage and Postmodern Resources. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 15(1), pp. 5–15. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2014.0141.
  • Van Mierlo, B., & Totin, E. (2014). Between Script and Improvisation: Institutional Conditions and Their Local Operation. Agriculture, 43(3), pp. 157–163. DOI: 10.5367/oa.2014.0179.
  • Visscher, K., Heusinkveld, S., & O’Mahoney, J. (2018). Bricolage and Identity Work. British Journal of Management, 29(2), pp. 356–372. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12220.
  • Ward, I. (2008). Bricolage and Low Cunning: Rorty on Pragmatism, Politics and Poetic Jus­tice. Legal Studies, 28(2), pp. 281–305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00088.x.
  • Weinstein, D., & Weinstein, M.A. (1991). Georg Simmel: Sociological Flȃneur Bricoleur. Theory, Culture & Society, 8(3), pp. 151–168. DOI: 10.1177/026327691008003011.
  • Zajda, K. (2017). Bricolage w wykorzystaniu zasobów społecznych wsi. Relacja między zasobami społecznymi obszarów partnerstw a kapitałem społecznym lokalnych grup działania z województw o odmiennych tradycjach społecznikowskich. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 46: Społeczne i indywidualne zasoby obszarów wiejskich, pp. 117–129.

bricolage bricoleur scientific research practice

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart