National Currencies and National Identities: Historical Origins and Ironies of the Neoliberal Baltic Model

During recent economic crisis 2008 – 2010, the economic policy of internal devaluation in the Baltic States earned the applause of exponents of the neoliberal orthodoxy. How to explain the choice and ability of the Baltic States to maintain the fixed exchange parity? Economists look for conventional costbenefit calculation. The paper advances culturalist NeoWeberian argument, elaborating the concept of “nation neoliberalism” of Henri Vogt and the research of Eric Helleiner on the contribution of national currencies to the modern nation building. Because of the destruction of the national Baltic States by Soviet occupation in 1940, postcommunist transformation in the Baltic States was restitutionally oriented. Hard national currency, modelled after “that old good Litas, Lats, or Kroon” of the interwar time became a central symbol of national identity along with national flag, anthem and coat of arms. This “monetization” of the Baltic identities predisposed indigenous Baltic peoples to embrace the neoliberal model of capitalism and to accept the cost of the defence of currency peg during the crisis. The success was ironically selfdefeating, as it enabled Baltic nations to join European Monetary Union, which conclusively disenchants the money by abolishing national currencies.

REFERENCES:

• Armingeon K., Baccaro L., Political Economy of the Sovereign Debt Crisis: The Limits of Internal Devaluation, “Industrial Law Journal” 2012, No. 3.
• Aslund A., The Last Shall Be the First: The East European Financial Crisis, 2008 – 10,Washington 2010.
• Aslund A., Dombrovskis V., How Latvia Came Through the Financial Crisis, Washington 2011.
• Baltijas valstis pirms Otrā pasaules kara [The Baltic States Before World War II), R. Nadziņš (ed.), Riga 2002.
• Blanchard O., Lessons from Latvia, VOX 15.06.2012, http://www.voxeu.org/article/lessonslatvia, [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Blanchard O., Johnson D.R., Macroeconomics, Edinburgh 2013.
• Bohle D., Greskovits B., Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery, Ithaca 2012.
• Cesevičius D., Lietuvos ekonominė politika 1918 – 1940 [Economic Policy of Lithuania 1918 – 1940], Vilnius 1995.
• Dodd N., The Sociology of Money: Economics, Reason and Contemporary Society, Cambridge 1994.
• Dodd N., Money and the NationState: Contested Boundaries of Monetary Sovereignty in Geopolitics, “International Sociology” 1995, No. 2.
• Dodd N., What is ‘Sociological’ about the Euro, “European Societies” 2001, No. 1.
• Dodd N., On Simmel’s Pure Concept of Money, “Archives européennes de sociologie” 2007, No. 2.
• Drahokoupil J., Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe: The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment, London 2008.
• Eichengreen B., Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System, Princeton 2008.
• Estonian Exceptionalism, “The Economist” 14.07.2011, http://www.economist.com/node/18959241, [Access date: 24.07.2014].European Industrial Relations Observatory Online,Country Profiles, http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro, [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Feldmann M., Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries. Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia, “Comparative Political Studies” 2006, No. 7.
• From Max Weber, H.H.Gerth, C.Wrigth Mills (eds.), London 2009.
• Greskovits B., Estonia, Hungary, and Slovenia: Banking on Identity [in:] Central Banks at the Age of the Euro: Europeanization, Convergence, and Power, K.Dyson, Marcussen (eds.), Oxford 2009.
• Helleiner E., National Currencies and National Identities, “American Behavioral Scientist” 1998, No. 10.
• Helleiner E., The Making of National Money: Territorial Currencies in Historical Perspective, Ithaca 2003.
• Jakeliūnas S., Lietuvos krizės anatomija [The Anatomy of Lithuanian Crisis], Kaunas 2010.
• Juska A., Woolfson Ch., Policing Political Protest in Lithuania, “Crime, Law and Social Change” 2012, Vol. 57 (4).
• Krugman P., Latvia Is the New Argentina (slightly Wonkish), “The New York Times. The Opinion Pages” 23.12.2008, http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/latviaisthenewargentinaslightlywonkish/ [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Kasekamp A., A History of the Baltic Countries, New York 2010.
• Katzenstein P., Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca 1985.
• Knöbl A., Sutt A., Zavoico B., The Estonian Currency Board: Its Introduction and Role in the Early Success of Estonia’s Transition to a Market Economy, IMF Working Paper WP/02/92, Washington 2002.
• Kuokštis V., Vidinio prisitaikymo politinė ekonomija Baltijos šalyse: valstybių reakcijosį krizę aiškinimas [The Political Economy of Internal Adjustment in the Baltic States Explaining Responses to the Crisis], Doctoral Dissertation (Political Science 02S), Vilnius 2013.
• Kirsebom D., Zuccheli C., Hard Landing: The Fairy Tale of the Rise and Fall of the Estonian Economy, Tallinn 2008.
• Korhonen I., Currency Boards in the Baltic Countries: What Have We Learned?, “PostCommunist Economies” 2000, No. 1.
• Laar M., Estonia: Little Country that Could, London 2002.
• Latvia and Greece: Baltic Thaw, Aegean Freeze, “The Economist“ 25.02.2012, http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1558056>, [Accessdate: 24.07.2014].
• Lagerspetz M., Vogt H., Estonia [in:] The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe,S. Berglund, J.Ekman, F.Aarebrot (eds.), Cheltenham 2004.
• Lauristin M., Vihalemm P., The Political Agenda During Different Periods of Estonian Transformation: External and Internal Factors, “Journal of Baltic Studies” 2009, No.40 (1).
• Lauristin M., In Summary: What Could the Baltic Way Be in the 21Century?, “Estonian Human Development Report 2011. Baltic Way(s) of Human Development. Twenty Years On”, Tallinn 2011, http://kogu.ee/public/eia2011/eia_eng_2011.pdf [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Lehti M., Protégé or Gobetween: The Role of the Baltic States after 9/11 in EU–US Relations, “Journal of Baltic Studies” 2007, No. 2.
• Lehti M., Jokisipilä M., Juttila M., Never Ending Second World War: Public Performances of National Dignity and Drama of Bronze Soldier, “Journal of Baltic Studies“ 2009, 4.
• Myant M., Drahokoupil J., Transition Economies. Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, New York 2011.
• Norkus Z., On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Patterns in Postcommunist Transformation, Vilnius 2012.
• Norkus Z., When the Kondratieff Winter Comes: An Exploration of the Recent Economic Crisis from a Long Wave Theory Perspective, “Przestrzeń społeczna” [Social Space] 2013, No. 1., http://socialspacejournal.eu/Pi%C4%85ty%20numer/Zenonas%20Norkus%20%20KondratieffWinter.pdf, [Access date: 22.07.2014].
• Olson M., The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge,MA 1971.
• Plakans A., A Concise History of the Baltic States, Cambridge 2011.
• Raudla R., Fiscal Retrenchment in Estonia During the Financial Crisis: The Role of Institutional Factors, “Public Administration” 2011, No. 1.
• Raudla R., Kattel R., Why Did Estonia Choose Fiscal Retrenchment After the 2008 Crisis?,“Journal of Public Policy” 2011, No. 2.
• Reinert E.S., Kattel R., Failed and Asymmetrical Integration. The Baltics and the NonFinancial Origins of the European Crisis [in:] The Contradictions of Austerity. The SocioEconomic Costs of the Neoliberal Baltic Model, J.Sommers, Ch.Woolfson (eds.), London 2014.
• Reinhart C.M., Rogoff K., This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly,Princeton 2009.
• Risse Th., EngelmannMartin,
• , Knoppe, H.J.,
• Roscher K., To Euro or Not to Euro?: The EMU and Identity Politics in the European Union, “European Journal of International Relations” 1999, No. 5.
• Roubini N., Latvia’s Currency Crisis Is a Rerun of Argentina’s, FT.com 10.06.2009, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/95df08fe55f3-11deab7e00144feabdc0.html#axzz16uuaG9Jc, [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Rozenfeld I., Эстония до и после „бронзовой ночи”: Эстонская республика 1991 – 2009.Левоцентристский взгляд [Estonia Before and After Night: Estonian Republic1991 – 2009. LefttotheCentreView], Tartu 2009.
• Simmel G., The Philosophy of Money, London 1978.
• Sippola M., The Awkward Choices Facing the Baltic Worker: Exit or Loyalty, “Journal ofBaltic Studies” 2013, No. 4.
• Tere J., Estonian Exporters Support Kroon Devaluation, “The Baltic Course” 25.02.2009, http://www.balticcourse.com/eng/markets_and_companies/?doc=10315, [Access date:24.07.2014].
• Thorhallsson B., Kattel R., NeoLiberalSmall States and Economic Crisis: Lessons forDemocratic Corporatism, “Journal of Baltic Studies“ 2013, No. 1.
• Valge J., Breaking Away From Russia: Financial Stabilization in Estonia 1918 – 1924, Stockholm2006, http://www.hot.ee/valge/breaking.pdf, [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Vogt H., Estonia – Ever More Firmly in the NationliberalCourse?, “Baltic Rim EconomiesExpert Articles” 2012, No. 6, http://www.utu.fi/fi/yksikot/tse/yksikot/PEI/raportitjatietopaketit/Documents/BRE%202011%20.pdf, [Access date: 24.07.2014].
• Weisbrot M., A Baltic Future for Greece?, “The Guardian” 28.04.2010, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/28/greecefinancialcrisis,[Access date:24.07.2014].
• Weisbrot M., Europe’s Leaders Are Playing with Fire If They Follow the Latvian Example,“The Guardian”15.12.2011, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/dec/15/europelatviaexamplemarkweisbrot, [Access date:24.07.2014].
• Woolfson C., Kallaste E., Illusory Corporatisms in the Baltic States, “Warsaw Forum ofEconomic Sociology” 2011, No. 1.
• Woolfson Ch., Sommers J., Conclusion: The Neoliberal Baltic Austerity Model AgainstSocial Europe [in] The Contradictions of Austerity. The SocioEconomicCosts of theNeoliberal Baltic Model, J.Sommers, Ch. Woolfson (eds.), London 2014.World Development Indicators 2013, http://data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/worlddevelopmentindicators,[Access date: 14.12.2014].