Społeczna percepcja szans i zagrożeń korzystania z nowych technologii komunikacyjnych

Development and popularization of new communication technologies generate new dimensions of opportunities and threats associated with learning and using technologies as well as with their sociocultural consequences. The article presents four dimensions of social perception of these threats and opportunities: creativity, representative potential, psychological attitude, privacy and control. They were distinguished on the basis of two research projects using qualitative research techniques. Particular attention was dedicated to generational usage of technology. In this way, the paper may be the basis for distinguishing the dimensions of technological competencies.

REFERENCES:

• 2016 Digital Yearbook. We Are Social’s Compendium of Key Digital Statistics and Data Points for 232 Countries Around the World. Pobrane z: http://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/2016-digital-yearbook
• Batorski, D. (2015). Technologie i media w domach i w życiu Polaków. W: J. Czapiński, T. Panek (red.), Diagnoza Społeczna 2015 (s. 355 – 377). Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.
• Baudrillard, J. (2005). Symulakry i symulacja. Warszawa: Sic!
• Bosch, T. (2011). Young women and „technologies of the self”: Social networking and sexualities. Agenda: Empowering women for gender equity, 25:4, s. 75 – 86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2011.630579
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated. The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
• Chabers, D. (2006). New Social Ties. Contemporary Connections in a Fragmented Society. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Couldry, N., van Dijck, J. (2015). Researching Social Media as if the Social Mattered. Social Media + Society, 1(2), s. 1 – 7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305115604174
• Dholakiaa, N., Reyesb, I., Bonoffa, J. (2015). Mobile media: from legato to staccato, isochronal consumptionscapes. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(1), s. 10 – 24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2014.899216
• Digital in 2017. Global Overview. A Collection of Internet, Social Media and Mobile Data from Around the World. Pobrane z: http://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/digital-in-2017-global-overview
• Gardner, H., Davis, K. (2013). The App Generation. How Today’s Youth Navigate Identity, Intimacy and Imagination in a Digital World. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
• Gruhn, A., Brzózka-Złotnicka, I. (2014). Katalog kompetencji medialnych, informacyjnych i cyfrowych. Warszawa: Fundacja Nowoczesna Polska. Pobrano z: http://edukacjamedialna.edu.pl/media/chunks/attachment/Katalog_kompetencji_medialnych_2014_EudBrrI.pdf
• Humphreys, L. (2005). Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era. New media & society, 7(6), s. 810 – 833. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444805058164
• Keen, A. (2007). Kult amatora. Jak internet niszczy kulturę? Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
• Khunou, G. (2012). Making love possible: cell phones and intimate relationships. African Identities, 10(2), s. 169 – 179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2012.657860
• Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance Society. Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckinghman, Philadelphia: Oxford University Press.
• Postman, N. (1995). Technopol. Triumf techniki nad kulturą. Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza SA.
• Rainie, L., Wellman, B. (2012). Networked. The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
• Rogowski, Ł. (2014). Kompetencja codzienności. Zarys problematyki i propozycja badań. Poznań. Pobrane z: http://lepiejwidziec.com/pub/uploaddocs/kompetencja_codziennosci_-_zarys_problematyki_i_propozycja_badan.pdf
• Siuda, P, Strunża, G. (red.) (2012). Dzieci sieci 2.0. Kompetencje komunikacyjne młodych, Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej. Pobrano z: http://dziecisieci.ikm.gda.pl/images/Dzieci_sieci_2.0.pdf
• Van Dijk, J. (2010). Społeczne aspekty nowych mediów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.