Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Politics (Selected Issues Related to Political Market)

Author: Magdalena Musiał-Karg
Institution: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan
Year of publication: 2015
Source: Show
Pages: 128-145
DOI Address:
PDF: kie/108/kie10808.pdf

Information and communication technologies impact many aspects of the contemporary political life. A consequence of the use of ICT in politics is undoubtedly the evolution of democratic institutions and procedures. Modern technologies find their application as tools for exercising democratic power. This is why their importance is constantly increasing. The changes that follow application of ICT and their consequences are especially interesting subject to study and research. This article aims at answering the question how modern technologies (mainly the Internet) affect the processes of contemporary democracy and what might be the consequences of such changes. The deliberations shall concern the context of political market, where three processes between three main actors (politicians/political institutions, electorate, and the media) occur: informing, communicating, and voting. ICT influence these processes by quickening supplementing, and facilitating three various types of activities: sharing information, involvement in the political debate, and participation in the political decisionmaking processes. In the article, the author also pays attention to election silence as a phenomena functioning in the background of elections (which are a very significant element of the political market). Examples provided in the article come mainly from the practises and experiences of the Polish political life.


  • Antoszewski A., Herbu t R., Leksykon politologii, Wrocław 1998.
  • Browning G., Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Transform American Politics, Medford 2002.
  • Campaign silence, The ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, [access: 12.05.2012].
  • Carrizales T., Critical Factors in an Electronic Democracy: a Study of Municipal Managers, “The Electronic Journal of eGovernment” 2008, Vol. 6, Issue 1.
  • Cichosz M., (Auto) Kreacja wizerunku polityka na przykładzie wyborów prezydenckich w III RP, Toruń 2007.
  • Communication Handbook, [access: 10.06.2014].
  • Definicja i rodzaje blogów, 25.03.2008, Dziennikarstwo internetowe,, [access: 3.11.2011].
  • Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, K.L. Hacker, J. van Dijk (eds.), London 2000.
  • Hague B.N., Loader B., Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decisionmaking in the Information Age, New York 1999.
  • Kampania w sieci, J.M. Zając, D. Batorski (eds.), Warszawa 2011.
  • Keohane R.O., Nye jr J., Power and Interdependence in the Information Age [in:] Democracy. com? Governence in a Networked World, E.C. Kamarck, J.S. Nye (eds.), Hollis 1999.
  • Konsbruck R.L., Impacts of Information Technology on Society in the new Century, LausanneVidy, [access: 10.06.2014].
  • Kryszeń G., Standardy prawne wolnych wyborów parlamentarnych, Białystok 2007.
  • Ludwik Dorn’s blog (Blog Ludwika Dorna), [access: 15.04.2008].
  • Madise Ü., Martens T., Evoting in Estonia 2005. The First Practice of Countrywide Binding Internet Voting in the World [in:] Electronic Voting 2006, 2nd International Workshop Coorganized by Council of Europe, ESF TED, IFIP WG 8.5 and EVoting. CC, August, 2nd – 4th, 2006 in Castle Hofen, Bregenz, Austria, R. Krimmer (ed.), Bonn 2006.
  • MusiałKarg M., Cisza wyborcza w dobie Internetu, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2013, nr 3.
  • MusiałKarg M., Demokracja a Internet – doświadczenia Szwajcarii i Polski [in:] Jednostkaspołeczeństwopaństwo wobec megatrendów współczesnego świata. Polska Pięć lat w Unii Europejskiej, G. Piwnicki, S. Mrozowska (eds.), Gdańsk 2009.
  • MusiałKarg M., Elektroniczne referendum w Szwajcarii. Wybrane kierunki zmian helweckiej demokracji bezpośredniej, Poznań 2012.
  • MusiałKarg M., Internetowe głosowanie w Estonii na przykładzie wyborów w latach 2005 – 2009, „Przegląd Politologiczny” 2011, No. 3.
  • MusiałKarg M., The Theory and Practice of Online Voting. The Case of Estonia (selected issues), “Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies” 2011, No. 29.
  • Porębski L., Elektroniczne oblicze polityki. Demokracja, państwo, instytucje polityczne w okresie rewolucji informacyjnej, Kraków 2004.
  • Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform, R. Heeks (ed.), London 1999.
  • Rakowska A., Rulka M., Centralny elektroniczny rejestr wyborców podstawą reform prawa wyborczego, the Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw 2011.
  • Report on the Relative Effectiveness of the Regulatory Frameworks for Electronic Communications in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Turkey, [access: 15.02.2013].
  • Simuforosa M., The Impact of Modern Technology on the Educational Attainment of Adolescents, “International Journal of Education and Research” September 2013, Vol. 1, No. 9.
  • Szczegółowe informacje dotyczące prawyborów, 27.03.2010,,szczegoloweinformacjedotyczaceprawyborow.html [access: 10.05.2011].
  • Szreder M., Emocje i prawda wieczoru wyborczego, 27.09.2011,,,723522.html?p=1 [access: 2.06.2014].
  • Taylor J., Burt E., Parliaments on the Web: Learning through Innovation [in:] Parliament in the Age of Internet, S. Coleman et al. (eds.), Oxford 1999.
  • The statement of the Internet Society Poland (ISOC) Concerning Evoting in General Elections, Adopted by the ISOC Management Board on 10th January 2007 (Resolution of the ISOC Poland Management Board No. 2/2007), January 1st, 2007, Internet Society Poland, [access: 13.04.2014].
  • Tsagarousianou R., Electronic democracy: Rhetoric and reality. Communications, “The European Journal of Communication Research” 1999, Vol. 24, No. 2.
  • Ustawa z dnia 5 stycznia 2011 r. Kodeks wyborczy Dz. U. 2011, nr 21 poz. 112 Act of 5th January 2011 – The Election Code, Journal of Laws 31 January, 2011.
  • Weber L., A Survey of the Literature on the Internet and Democracy, Paper Presented at the Prospects for Electronic Democracy Conference, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh 2002.
  • Wimmer P., Elektroniczna demokracja, 2004, [access: 10.05.2011].

information and communication technologies internet politics political market political communication e-voting election silence

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart