Modern Legal Ways in Regulating the Activities of Peer-To-Peer Networks, in the Context of Ensuring the Protection of Intellectual Rights
- Institution: Odessa State University of Internal Affairs
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000- 0001-6069-839X
- Year of publication: 2020
- Source: Show
- Pages: 21-36
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20200102
- PDF: ksm/25/ksm2502.pdf
The issue of intellectual property protection on the global information network the Internet has recently become a matter of serious concern on the part of rights holders. Copyright, which arose with the invention of book printing in medieval Europe, was originally planned and understood as an institution of exclusive author’s monopoly on the production of material copies of works. In fact, it is in this context that the concept of copyright existed until the XXI century. On the eve of the new millennium, the emergence of an unprecedented phenomenon for its time - the World Wide Web, has significantly shaken traditional views on the concept of copyright and the limits of its regulation.
The effectiveness of the copyright approach to the protection of the legitimate interests of right holders was questioned as early as 1845 by the American judge in the case of Emerson V. Davies. In his opinion, the exclusive rights to the results of creative activity are inadmissible, given that these results themselves are the result of thoughts, ideas, images that were created and repeatedly used by other people.
Indeed, creativity is impossible without attracting or borrowing from the “intellectual treasury” of civilization. With the development of modern information technology, such borrowing has become available to anyone with an Internet connection. With the proliferation of computer programs that allow you to record music, create images, animation, creativity is no longer an elite activity available only to the select few.
REFERENCES:
- ArtisMedia (2018), Piringovyie seti. Chto takoe Peer-to-peer? [Peer-topeer networks. What is Peer-to-peer?]. Retrieved from: http://artismedia.by/blog/chto-takoe-peer-to-peer/.
- Chugunkov V. (2011), Chto takoe piringovyie seti? Printsip rabotyi i pravila faylovogo obmena. [What are peer-to-peer networks? The principle of operation and rules of file sharing.]. Retrieved from: http://www.compbegin.ru/articles/view/_28.
- Darbidyan S. (2013), Nekommercheskoe piratstvo - dvigatelʹ informatsionnogo obschestva [Non-commercial piracy - the engine of the information society]. Retrieved from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20274529.
- Digital Economy Act. Official web site of UK Government. Retrieved from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/30/contents/enacted/data.html.
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Official web site of USA Congress. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/housebill/2281/text.
- Direktiva Radi 92/100/EES “Schodo prava na prokat ta prava na otrimannia rentnoï plati ta deyakih prav, povʼyazanih z avtorsʹkim pravom v galuzì ìntelektualʹnoï vlasnostì” [Directive of the Council of the European Communities № 92/100 / EEC “On rental rights and rent rights and certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property”]. Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_360.
- Kodeks Ukrayiny pro administratyvni pravoporushennya [Code of Ukraine of Administrative Offenses] Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10.
- Kryminal`nyj kodeks Ukrayiny [Criminal Code of Ukraine] Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14.
- Kuznetsova E. (2011), Borba za kontent [The struggle for content]. Retrieved from: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1576801.
- Law of the Republic of Chile “On Communications”. Official web site of Chile Congress. Retrieved from: https://legislacion-oficial.vlex.cl/vid/ley-n-septiembre-telecomunicaciones-277499799.
- Motomac (2010), OneSwarm - polnostyu detsentralizovannaya piringovaya set [OneSwarm - a fully decentralized peer-to-peer network]. Retrieved from: https://habr.com/ru/post/83976/.
- Nergelovic P. (1845), Davies-plagiarism. Materials of the court case. Retrieved from: http://fredrickey.info/dms/DeptHeads/Davies-plagiarism.html.
- Radaikin M. (2013), Pravovoe polozhenie torrent-trekerov i ih polʹzovateley [Legal status of torrent trackers and their users Materials of the Internet publication]. Retrieved from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20282129.
- Waldfogel J. (2012), Reel Piracy: The Effect of Online Film Piracy on International Box Office Sales. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228120858_Reel_Piracy_The_Effect_of_Online_Film_Piracy_on_International_Box_Office_Sales.
- Zakon Ukrajiny “Pro avtorsʹke pravo ì sumìzhnì prava” [Law of Ukraine “On Copyright and Related Rights”]. Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12.
- Zakon Ukrajiny “Pro elektronnu komerciju” [Law of Ukraine “On E-Commerce”]. Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/675-19.
provider program computer web resource file tracker torrent work internet