The Principle of Solidarity In the Sense of Exercising the Right to Social Dialogue In the Conditions of Globalization

The authors study the principle of solidarity in the sense of exercising the right to social dialogue in the context of globalization. The authors are convinced that without civic association there can be no direct influence of citizens on social processes in the state and certain spheres of public life. Solidarity in this sense is the social unity of individuals united by a certain property in the awareness of the need for such a combination to achieve a specific positive goal. In this way, solidarity is different from any other combination that exists for its own sake, and not to achieve a certain result. This understanding is especially important in the labor sphere in the exercise of the right to social dialogue. In today’s globalized world, the problem of the ineffectiveness of social dialogue must be considered not only in the institutional, legal or cultural aspect, but in terms of the possibility of social solidarity. The authors point out that the modern state can’t always meet the challenges of modernity, in particular, with the strong influence of transnational corporations as the main actors in globalization. That’s why the state needs the solidarity of citizens around this problem when solving the tasks of ensuring social justice in the labor sphere. The authors believe that the result of such solidarity should be the active implementation in the practice of social dialogue of international framework agreements between transnational corporations, the state and citizens, represented by specialized trade unions, including international ones.

REFERENCES:

• Bauman Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge; Polity. 240.
• Bauman Z. (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge; Polity. 272.
• Bell D. (1976) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. London; Basic Books. 507.
• Bourdieu P. (1993) The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society Paperback. Paris: Seuil. 947.
• Chang Ha-Joon (2013). Europe is haunted by the myth of the lazy mob. The Guardian. Access mode: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/29/myth-lazy-mob-hands-rich
• Erhard L. (1996). Polveka razmyshleniy: rechi i stati [Half-century of reflections: speeches and articles]. Moskva; Nauka. 606. [in Russian]
• Habermas J. (2005) Politicheskiye raboty [Political works]. Мoskva; Praksis. 368. [in Russian]
• Hardt M., Negri A. (2001) Empire. London; Harvard University Press. 478.
• Latish Y. (2016) Lishniye lyudi na purpurnykh polyakh [Latish Y. Superfluous people in the purple fields]. Access mode: http://liva.com.ua/pension-brexit.html [in Russian]
• Matsonaushili T. (2001) Problema perestroyki gosudarstva v Zapadnoy Yevrope [The problem of state restructuring in Western Europe]. Pro et Contra; 6; 3. [in Russian]
• Muller T. (2009) Mezhdunarodnyye ramochnyye soglasheniya - vozmozhnosti i predely ispol’zovaniya novogo instrumenta global’noy profsoyuznoy politiki [International Framework Agreements - Opportunities and Limits for Using a New Instrument for Global Trade Union Policy]. International trade union cooperation. Access mode: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/06568.pdf [in Russian]
• Novikov D.O. (2015) Pluralitas non est poneda sine necessiate abo mistse teoriy prekariatu u nautsi trudovoho prava [Pluralities are not poneda sine necessiate or place of precariat theories in the science of labor law]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series; 34; 2. 22-26. [in Ukrainian]
• Osovyy H. (2016) Plan diy Uryadu mozhe staty osnovoyu konsolidatsiyi suspil’stva za umovy, yakshcho vin vidpovidaye zapytam i potrebam lyudey [The Government’s Action Plan can become the basis for the consolidation of society, provided that it meets the demands and needs of the people]. Access mode: http://www.fpsu.org.ua/napryamki-diyalnosti/sotsialnij-dialog/10307-grigorij-osovij-plan-dij-uryadumozhe-stati-osnovoyu-konsolidatsiji-suspilstva-za-umovi-yakshchovin-vidpovidae-zapitam-i-potrebam-lyudej [in Ukrainian]
• Seymour R. (2012) We Are All Precarious - On the Concept of the Precariat and its Misuses. New LeftReview; 10. Access mode: http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/we_are_all_precarious_on_the_concept_of_the_precariat_and_its_misuses
• Sidorina T.Y. (2005) Dva veka sotsial’noy politiki [Two Centuries of Social Policy]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. 442. [in Russian]
• Tolstoy L.N. (1984) Sobraniye sochineniy [Collected Works]. Moscow: Fiction; 19. 868. [in Russian]
• Tripartite Declaration of Principles on Transnational Enterprises and Social Policy, adopted by the Governing Body of the International Labor Office at its 204th Session (Geneva, November 1977). Access mode:
• http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/--multi/documents/publication/wcms_166483.pdf
• Webster F. (1995) Theories of the Information Society. London; Routledge. 416.
• Wright G. H. (1997) The crisis of social science and the withering away of the nation state. Associations. 1. 49-52.